View Full Version : The GOP can kiss my ass
Captain Obvious
10-11-2012, 04:43 PM
After filing for an absentee ballot, I took the opportunity to change my party affiliation.
Hasta la vista.
GrassrootsConservative
10-11-2012, 05:11 PM
I'm registered as a Dumbocrat so I can vote in the primaries for whomever I think is the most damaging candidate to the Dumbocrat party.
exotix
10-11-2012, 05:12 PM
I'm registered as a Dumbocrat so I can vote in the primaries for whomever I think is the most damaging candidate to the Dumbocrat party.
That's Zimmermans' shtick.
birddog
10-11-2012, 05:28 PM
After filing for an absentee ballot, I took the opportunity to change my party affiliation.
Hasta la vista.
The GOP will miss you greatly, like some of us miss having a bad cold. :rollseyes:
Deadwood
10-11-2012, 05:35 PM
Kiss your...?
But your junk is ugly...
Captain Obvious
10-11-2012, 05:36 PM
Kiss your...?
But your junk is ugly...
They can kiss that too.
Canadianeye
10-11-2012, 05:39 PM
Think I'll travel to Michigan in a few weeks. It's always nice this time of year.
garyo
10-11-2012, 05:42 PM
I understand an evening stroll through downtown Detroit can be quite stimulating.
patrickt
10-11-2012, 05:44 PM
They can kiss that too.
Ah, that's why you left.
Canadianeye
10-11-2012, 05:46 PM
I understand an evening stroll through downtown Detroit can be quite stimulating.
I remember in the 70's it was kiddie gangs with zip guns. Going to Hazelpark raceway...you didn't want to get sidetracked or lost.
Mainecoons
10-11-2012, 06:00 PM
I understand an evening stroll through downtown Detroit can be quite stimulating.
Bring yer running shoes! :rofl:
GrassrootsConservative
10-11-2012, 06:02 PM
Bring yer running shoes! :rofl:
But not if they're expensive.
coolwalker
10-12-2012, 09:25 AM
After filing for an absentee ballot, I took the opportunity to change my party affiliation.
Hasta la vista.
Turned commie eh!
Mister D
10-12-2012, 09:26 AM
After filing for an absentee ballot, I took the opportunity to change my party affiliation.
Hasta la vista.
To independent?
Captain Obvious
10-12-2012, 08:44 PM
To independent?
Yes.
Peter1469
10-12-2012, 08:54 PM
In VA we don't register to vote by party. Anyway, I left the GOP in 2006 because they were spending link drunken liberals.
head of joaquin
10-12-2012, 09:00 PM
I'm registered as a Dumbocrat so I can vote in the primaries for whomever I think is the most damaging candidate to the Dumbocrat party.
Who would still be an Einstein compared to the best GOP cretin.
birddog
10-12-2012, 11:02 PM
Any R candidate that was running for the nomination would have been far superior to the Kenyan scumbucket Obama!
Peter1469
10-12-2012, 11:25 PM
Careful, even Ryan is a Keynesian....
texmaster
10-12-2012, 11:42 PM
After filing for an absentee ballot, I took the opportunity to change my party affiliation.
Hasta la vista.
You either work to change the GOP from what it is or you give in to liberalism.
There is no other viable solution.
Captain Obvious
10-12-2012, 11:45 PM
You either work to change the GOP from what it is or you give in to liberalism.
There is no other viable solution.
Sounds like something Chairman Mao would say.
Careful, even Ryan is a Keynesian....
No he's not...
Is he?
texmaster
10-12-2012, 11:54 PM
Sounds like something Chairman Mao would say.
Its called reality and its easily proven.
The president picks the Supreme Court justices.
Let's take a look at a few decided by ONE VOTE.
Obamacare- Another 5-4 decesion giving us the biggest tax increase in US history
2nd Ammendment- Our right to keep and bear arms nearly fell to the liberals.
Property Rights- 5-4 liberals now allow the state to take away your property to build something else.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission- Spending rights for groups of people upheld by only one vote
The temper tantrums by so called libertarians refusing to vote for republicans when their vote really counts is suicidal. You let liberals in they control the Supreme Court and you can kiss your rights away forever.
The only flight is the internal fight. We are drumming out the RINOs but it can't be done in one election cycle. It will take time. You don't run away with your toy and go home. You change the game.
You can't get back decisions made by liberal judges. They use and abuse the system. If you run from the only group strong enough to take them down you will loose the country you claim you want to protect.
Captain Obvious
10-12-2012, 11:57 PM
Hold on... deja vue.
Ok, I'm back.
Hang on another sec, gotta shit. BRB
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission- Spending rights for groups of people upheld by only one vote
...
You can't get back decisions made by liberal judges. They use and abuse the system. If you run from the only group strong enough to take them down you will loose the country you claim you want to protect.
This was decided 5-4 by Republican appointees...
Conley
10-13-2012, 12:01 AM
Can't forget Roberts with "obamacare" either
Captain Obvious
10-13-2012, 12:03 AM
Can't forget Roberts with "obamacare" either
Megaawesomeness
texmaster
10-13-2012, 12:04 AM
This was decided 5-4 by Republican appointees...
Thats right. The freedom to participate in elections was upheld.
Way to ignore the ones decided by liberals. You really think they are the same? Wanna go toe for toe on the decisions? Just say the word.
The way I see it the two parties are in for the special interests for the long run. If you wanna make a difference, flipping off the establishment is the best you can do.
texmaster
10-13-2012, 12:04 AM
Can't forget Roberts with "obamacare" either
Only proving my point. One rogue conservative voted with the liberals and we have Obamacare.
Way to ignore the ones decided by liberals. You really think they are the same? Wanna go toe for toe on the decisions? Just say the word.
No I just think they're both pretty shit tier.
texmaster
10-13-2012, 12:05 AM
No I just think they're both pretty shit tier.
They aren't equal and that is the point. Don't pretend they are unless you are willing to be embarrassed.
Conley
10-13-2012, 12:06 AM
Only proving my point. One rogue conservative voted with the liberals and we have Obamacare.
Guess ya can't trust those GOP appointments then...
texmaster
10-13-2012, 12:08 AM
Guess ya can't trust those GOP appointments then...
Not 100% no. Thats why we need as many as possible.
Nice try Conley.
Take notice my little libertarian friends. When they start thanking your posts and agreeing with you its time to think about your position.
Captain Obvious
10-13-2012, 12:09 AM
Poasts
They aren't equal and that is the point. Don't pretend they are unless you are willing to be embarrassed.
If there was some sort of objective standpoint for what makes something good then you'd have a case. Unfortunately what makes either party just shitty or really shitty is all subjective. I won't support either one in their bid for the presidency. You go do whatever you like :smiley:
texmaster
10-13-2012, 12:11 AM
If there was some sort of objective standpoint for what makes something good then you'd have a case.
I just gave you a list of Supreme Court cases decided by one vote. All you did was cherry pick one you didn't like and ignored the rest. A sure sign of a defeated opponent.
Unfortunately what makes either party just shitty or really shitty is all subjective. I won't support either one in their bid for the presidency. You go do whatever you like :smiley:
If you can't deal with the reality that the parties are not the same there is nothing I can do for you.
Conley
10-13-2012, 12:13 AM
When I have a choice between voting for crap, shit, or someone who represents my views...I'm gonna go with the third option. Time to start holding these jokers accountable for the mess they've made. I don't see how your method punishes them for the decisions they've made - it rewards them. Doesn't make any sense to me, you can't expect anything to get better by doing the same thing over and over.
Conley
10-13-2012, 12:14 AM
Poasts
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/21219644.jpg
GrassrootsConservative
10-13-2012, 12:15 AM
When I have a choice between voting for crap, shit, or someone who represents my views...I'm gonna go with the third option. Time to start holding these jokers accountable for the mess they've made. I don't see how your method punishes them for the decisions they've made - it rewards them. Doesn't make any sense to me, you can't expect anything to get better by doing the same thing over and over.
I know exactly what you mean.
I just gave you a list of Supreme Court cases decided by one vote. All you did was cherry pick one you didn't like and ignored the rest. A sure sign of a defeated opponent.
No, I pointed out that you can't say liberal appointees are the issue here when one of the cases you named was ruled by a conservative majority. That's called inconsistency.
You're missing the point tex. What I think is bad and what you think is bad is different because good and bad are subjective. You can't show that one is better because we probably have different priorities and ways we weigh different issues.
GrassrootsConservative
10-13-2012, 12:16 AM
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/21219644.jpg
Well how do you spend your Friday nights? I spend mine making drunk posts.
Conley
10-13-2012, 12:17 AM
I didn't drink tonight :sad: so that's my excuse for the poor quality of my poaasts :laugh:
Peter1469
10-13-2012, 05:57 AM
No he's not...
Is he?
Of course he is. If he wasn't, he would never have been allowed inside the budget process for so long. Although he doesn't dismiss the Austrian school.
Peter1469
10-13-2012, 06:01 AM
You either work to change the GOP from what it is or you give in to liberalism.
There is no other viable solution.
The GOP establishment is liberal. It is time for the Tea Party(ies) to make their own conservative path.
Trinnity
10-13-2012, 06:49 AM
I took the opportunity to change my party affiliation.
To what? ( oic -indie-, never mind)
Trinnity
10-13-2012, 06:53 AM
You either work to change the GOP from what it is or you give in to liberalism.
There is no other viable solution.The GOP is gradually becoming more libertarian. The establishment R's can't stop it either.
Trinnity
10-13-2012, 07:00 AM
No I just think they're both pretty shit tier.There's a big distinction. The R's are capitalists. The L's are Marxists. Didn't used to be, but it's been growing since Wilson and it has become Wilson's vision in the last decade or two. Since the fucked up hippie generation came to power. <spit> May they burn in hell.
Trinnity
10-13-2012, 07:03 AM
When I have a choice between voting for crap, shit, or someone who represents my views...I'm gonna go with the third option. Time to start holding these jokers accountable for the mess they've made. I don't see how your method punishes them for the decisions they've made - it rewards them. Doesn't make any sense to me, you can't expect anything to get better by doing the same thing over and over.But it IS changing. The Tea Party, the libertarian influx. It matters.
Mainecoons
10-13-2012, 07:04 AM
The GOP establishment is liberal. It is time for the Tea Party(ies) to make their own conservative path.
By far the best path is to take over the Republican Party.
Peter1469
10-13-2012, 07:10 AM
By far the best path is to take over the Republican Party.
I would do that by stepping outside and asking the conservatives to follow me. Let the liberals / big government types sit there in their shame.
texmaster
10-13-2012, 05:24 PM
No, I pointed out that you can't say liberal appointees are the issue here when one of the cases you named was ruled by a conservative majority. That's called inconsistency.
Wrong again. You really need to read more carefully. There is a massive difference between the two. You keep avoiding the cases that prove my point. Its a pretty pathetic tactic.
And since when is it anti conservative or anti libertarian to allow everyone to donate money?
You're missing the point tex. What I think is bad and what you think is bad is different because good and bad are subjective. You can't show that one is better because we probably have different priorities and ways we weigh different issues.
Of course I can by the number of close supreme court cases where basic rights were decided and a VAST majority of times the liberals have voted to limit our rights or expand them beyond the Constitution but you don't have the courage to admit it.
Step back and take a look again because you are clearly not paying attention.
texmaster
10-13-2012, 05:24 PM
The GOP establishment is liberal. It is time for the Tea Party(ies) to make their own conservative path.
Not all of it and not enough people will join in your new party before the Democrats destroy your rights.
Mainecoons
10-13-2012, 05:36 PM
It is basically impossible to start a new political party. It is much easier to take one over. You all are forgetting that this is exactly what has happened to the Democratic Party. It has been taken over by the radical left. All the TP needs to do is show up and do the precinct level work in the majority of precincts and they will own the party.
Conley
10-13-2012, 09:07 PM
But it IS changing. The Tea Party, the libertarian influx. It matters.
That's a good point. It's changing at the bottom, but at the top -- Romney is the exact opposite of that movement.
Morningstar
10-13-2012, 09:10 PM
Not all of it and not enough people will join in your new party before the Democrats destroy your rights.
You have no rights. Why would you ever think you did?!?
Mainecoons
10-14-2012, 07:10 AM
He reads and knows about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
Guess you don't. Something else that was left out of your "education" I suppose.
:grin:
patrickt
10-14-2012, 07:35 AM
It is basically impossible to start a new political party. It is much easier to take one over. You all are forgetting that this is exactly what has happened to the Democratic Party. It has been taken over by the radical left. All the TP needs to do is show up and do the precinct level work in the majority of precincts and they will own the party.
You are right. An honest Barack Obama or Nancy Pelosi or Rep. Waters or Rep. Jackson-Lee would run in the Communist Party of America or the Socialist Party of America but they know they wouldn't get in office.
If Roseanne Barr ran as a Democrat in Illinois, California, or Massachusetts she might get elected.
Canadianeye
10-14-2012, 08:10 AM
It is basically impossible to start a new political party. It is much easier to take one over. You all are forgetting that this is exactly what has happened to the Democratic Party. It has been taken over by the radical left. All the TP needs to do is show up and do the precinct level work in the majority of precincts and they will own the party.
Which is exactly what the TEA Party did in 2010, and it was brilliant. They outfoxed the MSM lapdogs for liberals who were so intent on business as usual of smearing and maligning...by going to the deeper more committed level of real change from the bottom up.
Even now 2012, Matt Kibbe and Dick Armey are focused on the Senate and Congress. Romneys feet will be held to the fire effectively.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egAJfT7Nt80
truthmatters
10-14-2012, 08:24 AM
I'm registered as a Dumbocrat so I can vote in the primaries for whomever I think is the most damaging candidate to the Dumbocrat party.
see here the duplicitous nature of your average R voter
birddog
10-14-2012, 08:56 AM
see here the duplicitous nature of your average R voter
Perhaps, but the R voter is legal and only votes once! :tongue:
Morningstar
10-14-2012, 10:02 AM
He reads and knows about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
Guess you don't. Something else that was left out of your "education" I suppose.
:grin:
They've been usurped.
truthmatters
10-14-2012, 10:05 AM
Perhaps, but the R voter is legal and only votes once! :tongue:
More lies.
You have no proof of democratic voters cheating in any number that effects elections.
the republican cheating in elections is court documented
truthmatters
10-14-2012, 10:06 AM
http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-25/news/mn-7435_1_republican-national-committee
GOP Memo Admits Plan Could 'Keep Black Vote Down'
October 25, 1986 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/1986/oct/25)|From the Washington Post
Email
Share
NEWARK, N.J. — A Republican National Committee official calculated that a so-called ballot security program in Louisiana "could keep the black vote down considerably," according to documents released in federal court Friday.
The documents and court hearing were the latest developments in a controversy over the GOP's ballot program that Democrats maintain is aimed at reducing minority turnout. The Republicans say the program's sole purpose is to purge ineligible voters from voting roles.
truthmatters
10-14-2012, 10:07 AM
http://personalliberty.com/2009/12/09/judge-denies-republicans-effort-to-end-voter-intimidation-consent-decree-19493836/
Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent DecreeDecember 9, 2009 by Personal Liberty News Desk (http://personalliberty.com/author/personallibertynewsdeskpl/)
http://pictures.directnews.co.uk/liveimages/voting_1961_19493836_0_0_7021094_300.jpgLast week, a federal judge in New Jersey rejected an attempt by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to dissolve a 27-year-old court order that is intended to prevent the intimidation of minority voters.
Stemming from a lawsuit brought forth by the Democratic National Committee in 1982, a consent decree was agreed upon which forced the RNC to gain court approval to use certain election
truthmatters
10-14-2012, 10:08 AM
we have proof you have nothing
birddog
10-14-2012, 01:28 PM
More lies.
You have no proof of democratic voters cheating in any number that effects elections.
the republican cheating in elections is court documented
You and the truth are far apart! Your username is an oxymoron.
patrickt
10-14-2012, 01:37 PM
More lies.
You have no proof of democratic voters cheating in any number that effects elections.
the republican cheating in elections is court documented
The last refuge of a Democrat scoundrel. "You have no proof and i haven't been convicted....yet."
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.