Limbaugh ~ Trump actually won Popular Vote

[exotix]

Today


http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1478265286/_0_drivedevil_gl7fz5.gif


http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/12/21/they_re_still_gobsmacked_washington_never_imagined _trump_could_really_win


"Ladies and gentlemen, did you see the final popular vote tally ?


Donald Trump won the election by three million votes, if you throw out California and New York.


You throw out California, New York, Trump wins by three million votes"



http://i67.tinypic.com/29q1rv4.jpg

[resister]

Bottom line, say president Trump :kiss:

[Don]

I would bet he expanded on that a lot more than the OP lets on.

[Captain Obvious]

lol

https://d1bm3dmew779uf.cloudfront.net/cover/1b7af7dc7a84345cdda1508eabdce3d6.jpg


Now, my question is a simple one. Since Hillary won the popular vote, why are they complaining about the Russians hacking the election? I mean, Hillary wins the popular vote, what more can a hacker do than get you the majority of the popular vote? But yet they're running around complaining about the hackers and they're blaming the Russians for stealing the election. And yet she won the majority of popular votes. It seems to me you can't have it both ways. I know some of you people, "Well, Rush, what do you mean Trump won by 2.8? You can't throw out New York and California." Well, they are. They are. When they say the Russians hacked the election, which didn't happen, by the way.

Furthermore, there is no evidence, there is not a scintilla of evidence even at this moment, there is not a scintilla of evidence that the Russians even are responsible for the leak of all of those Podesta emails to WikiLeaks, not a scintilla. Now, you may think that you've heard all these intelligence people running around saying that they have concluded that the Russians were trying to hack this and trying to hack that. That use of the word "conclusion," by the way, is kind of like the use of the word "claimed" by the Drive-By Media. As I pointed out yesterday, they throw the word "claimed" around as in "Limbaugh claims an audience of 20 million," in order to disqualify, in order to question, in order to de-authorize, if you will, the information. I don't claim anything. I report. I report the size of our audience. They report that I claim, meaning I'm making it up, meaning I'm just saying it.
It's the same thing here with this conclusion business. You are supposed to think that when, like when a consensus of scientists has concluded and that that equals sciences. Doesn't mean anything. It's just a bunch of people banding together telling you what they think. But there's nothing official behind it. The word "concluded" is a trick word. It's designed to attach authority and ontological certitude to whatever follows, when it's just another way of stating what somebody thinks.
All these little word tricks that the Drive-Bys play. And that's what I'm doing here, throw out New York and California, Trump wins the popular vote by nearly three million votes. But you can't throw out New York and California. This is exactly why we have the Electoral College. And again, one more time briefly. Had there been no Electoral College and had the election be defined by the popular vote, I guarantee you that the two states where the candidates would have been all the time are New York and California. There would have been some time in Texas and they would have ignored the vast majority of people in the country.
A vast majority of the geographical area of the country would have been ignored during the campaign, and so the results would have been different. Who's to say Trump would not have done better in California if he'd spent some time out there? And who's to say that Hillary would have done worse if she'd spent some time out there and actually had been seen by people in California like she was seen elsewhere as having questionable stamina.
So they're still playing word games with this and mind games, and it's clear they're having trouble coming to grips with it. In fact, David "Rodham" Gergen -- grab audio sound bite number two. Last night CNN, Erin Burnett OutFront is speaking with the dean of conventional wisdom in the Beltway, David Gergen. She said, "Calling Trump's voters angry white men, is Bill Clinton making a mistake there?"

[del]

i know this is a tough one, but maybe they think russians influencing our elections is just bad in general.

crazy talk, right?

[resister]

Tissue for your libby issues? Cwyy,your tears are the stuff of my joy!!!:cry: :kiss: :laugh:...LOL...suckers

[exotix]

I would bet he expanded on that a lot more than the OP lets on.That's why you post links.

[Don]

That's why you post links.

The title to your thread was misleading.

[Captain Obvious]

i know this is a tough one, but maybe they think russians influencing our elections is just bad in general.

crazy talk, right?

Right.

If they had material influence you'd have a point.

Keep your hips straight.

[del]

Right.

If they had material influence you'd have a point.

Keep your hips straight.
if you knew they didn't have material influence, so would you.

supinate your left wrist

[Captain Obvious]

if you knew they didn't have material influence, so would you.

supinate your left wrist

http://s.quickmeme.com/img/0b/0b20e380a7d7258415fff41e47cfb7396004e736403bbd3e7b 7743bb026eced7.jpg

[resister]

The title to your thread was misleading.As is almost every post by "it"

[resister]

http://s.quickmeme.com/img/0b/0b20e380a7d7258415fff41e47cfb7396004e736403bbd3e7b 7743bb026eced7.jpg
I don't like rap, but lil john is the crunk ass shizzle fo sho !!:afro: