pjohns
12-22-2016, 01:12 PM
Quite a few people (principally, those who simply will never accept the results of the 2016 presidential election) have pointed out--somewhat gratuitously--that Hillary Clinton actually won the popular vote. (Presumably, there are very few Americans who are unaware of this fact.)
Of course, this is not how we elect our presidents. And it never has been.
If it were, Donald Trump would have surely campaigned differently.
Anyway, here are the final results:
Nationwide:
Hillary Clinton: 65,844,610 votes
Donald Trump: 62,979,636 votes
Difference: 2,864,974 votes
But now, please, just look at California's totals:
Hillary Clinton: 8,753,788 votes
Donald Trump: 4,483,810 votes
Difference: 4,269,978 votes
Without California, therefore, Donald Trump would have won the popular vote by 1,405,004 votes.
So liberals are actually saying that they wish that California (just by itself) could decide the election.
Never mind that there is a growing movement for California to secede from the United States...
Of course, this is not how we elect our presidents. And it never has been.
If it were, Donald Trump would have surely campaigned differently.
Anyway, here are the final results:
Nationwide:
Hillary Clinton: 65,844,610 votes
Donald Trump: 62,979,636 votes
Difference: 2,864,974 votes
But now, please, just look at California's totals:
Hillary Clinton: 8,753,788 votes
Donald Trump: 4,483,810 votes
Difference: 4,269,978 votes
Without California, therefore, Donald Trump would have won the popular vote by 1,405,004 votes.
So liberals are actually saying that they wish that California (just by itself) could decide the election.
Never mind that there is a growing movement for California to secede from the United States...