Women in Obama White House earn less than men, amid 'equal pay' debate Read more

[garyo]

http://global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/Politics/obama_manchester2_101812.jpg

President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event at Veteran's Memorial Park, Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, in Manchester, N.H. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

What a classic case of hypocrisy, do as I say not as I do.







President Obama and his surrogates ripped into Mitt Romney over the past week for allegedly being wishy-washy on the matter of "equal pay" -- part of the campaign's aggressive appeal to vital female voters.

But despite all the rhetoric, federal records show that women who work in the Obama White House generally earn less than men -- about 18 percent less.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/19/women-in-obama-white-house-earn-less-than-men-amid-equal-pay-debate/#ixzz29mv1zYfq

[GrassrootsConservative]

Wow. Almost $10,000 a year average difference. I'd bet money he pays blacks more than whites too, the bigoted little Commie.

[garyo]

No doubt. lol

[Dakota Nights]

http://global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/Politics/obama_manchester2_101812.jpg

President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event at Veteran's Memorial Park, Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, in Manchester, N.H. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

What a classic case of hypocrisy, do as I say not as I do.





President Obama and his surrogates ripped into Mitt Romney over the past week for allegedly being wishy-washy on the matter of "equal pay" -- part of the campaign's aggressive appeal to vital female voters.

But despite all the rhetoric, federal records show that women who work in the Obama White House generally earn less than men -- about 18 percent less.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/19/women-in-obama-white-house-earn-less-than-men-amid-equal-pay-debate/#ixzz29mv1zYfq


I don't buy into what Fox News says, a bunch of right wing extremists.

[Trinnity]

Oh not ValJar though...she gets top salary and likes to consider herself the de facto prezzy.

[Deadwood]

I don't buy into what Fox News says, a bunch of right wing extremists.

Figures. When there's negative news about Obama, it's the messenger at fault, but anything negative about Romney is gospel.

I understand.

[Deadwood]

Figures. When there's negative news about Obama, it's the messenger at fault, but anything negative about Romney is gospel.

I understand.


And I won't bother asking for evidence that the item is wrong. It never happens.

[Dakota Nights]

Figures. When there's negative news about Obama, it's the messenger at fault, but anything negative about Romney is gospel.

I understand.

It's not that simple.

[Deadwood]

It's not that simple.

OK.

So show some evidence the item is wrong.


It's easy to dismiss shit by name calling, but I KNOW we're never going to see a true counter argument.

I give you credit, though, you haven't called anyone a "teabagger" or "necon"......yet.

[Dakota Nights]

OK.

So show some evidence the item is wrong.


It's easy to dismiss shit by name calling, but I KNOW we're never going to see a true counter argument.

I give you credit, though, you haven't called anyone a "teabagger" or "necon"......yet.

Fox News has been exposed for their bias millions of times.

All the facts are here:

http://mediamatters.org/tags/fox-news-channel (http://mediamatters.org/tags/fox-news-channel)

[Dakota Nights]

Hmm, silence.. I guess you lost Fearandloathing.

[Peter1469]

Media Matters is anti-Fox. They make stuff up all the time.

[Dakota Nights]

Media Matters is anti-Fox. They make stuff up all the time.

Do you have proof? I doubt.

[peoshi]

Do you have proof? I doubt.

I do.



Media Matters for America (MMfA) is a politically progressive (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressivism_in_the_United_States) media watchdog group that says it is "dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media".

"War on Fox"

In 2010 MMfA declared a "War on Fox". Brock said MMfA would focus its efforts on Fox and select conservative websites in what Brock called an "all-out campaign of 'guerrilla warfare and sabotage'" against Fox News.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Matters_for_America (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Matters_for_America)


Can We Please Stop Pretending Media Matters Is a Legitimate News Source?



On Sunday night, The Daily Caller (http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/12/inside-media-matters-sources-memos-reveal-erratic-behavior-close-coordination-with-white-house-and-news-organizations/)published a piece exposing Media Matters for America (MMFA) as the hypocritical, liberal rag that it is.Hey, there’s nothing wrong with being biased. What is wrong is being biased, and then pretending not to be.


http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/132992/can_we_please_stop_pretending?next=41 (http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/132992/can_we_please_stop_pretending?next=41)




Media Matters, left-biased media slanderers paid for by George Soros, caught doing precisely what they claimed Andrew Breitbart did to Shirely Sherrod

Lefty Media Matters Caught Editing Beck Audio Sherrod-Style

You’ve got to hand it to the good folks at Mediaite. These guys are on top of everything in the media world. This time Mediaite has uncovered (http://www.mediaite.com/online/media-matters-shirley-sherrods-glenn-becks-co-hosts-with-edited-audio/) the fact that Media Matters, the left-biased media slanderers paid for by George Soros, have been caught doing precisely what they claimed that New Media maven Andrew Breitbart did to Shirely Sherrod a few weeks ago. Namely foisted an edited tape on the world in order to slander someone in the public eye.


http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26315 (http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26315)



Here are a few of their donors:

Connections


Since Media Matters for America is a non-profit, they have to open up their books and it is pretty easy to find their "major" donors. So...here are just a few:



Tides Foundation ($4,384,702)
George Soros’ Open Society Institutes ($1,075,000)
Ford Foundation ($966,466)
Sandler Foundation ($400,000) — endowed by subprime mortgage lenders Herb and Marion Sandler, who once bankrolled the embattled ACORN organization
Schumann Fund for Media and Democracy ($600,000), managed by longtime PBS host Bill Moyers and his son
MoveOn.org ($50,000), the anti-George Bush organization
Barbra Streisand Foundation ($85,000)
Stride Rite Charitable Foundation ($25,000)
Lear Family Foundation ($55,000) — endowed by the TV producer and People for the American Way founder Norman Lear
Joyce Foundation ($400,000), whose board of directors included Barack Obama from 1994 to 2002.


Summary Opinion

The sponsors of this website reads like a who's who of left-winged, pro-socialist, anti-American activists who could really care less about true patriotism unless it supports their political agenda. The left-winged agenda really only wants to keep those who are enslaved to the government through social welfare programs PERMANENTLY enslaved, and they want to close the mouth of the right-wing patriots on radio and TV like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Fox News in general.


It is my opinion that this organization is socialistic by its very nature. They could care less about people in the United States who are "ruggedly individual" and those who do not care for the intrusion of government in their life or those who desire to NOT depend on the government for anything.

Their "tax exempt" status should be immediately revoked, and their leadership jailed for filing for this status under a false pretense. They are no more "tax exempt" than Barack Obama is a Republican.

Most of the information they publish is embellished with the left-wing agenda at all times and is full of deliberate false-hoods and general hatefulness. Shame on them for even using the word "media" in their title.



http://www.theablepatriot.com/media-matters.html (http://www.theablepatriot.com/media-matters.html)




:wink:

[patrickt]

My god, haven't people ever heard of "Do as I say and not as I do"? There's a reason liberals have a penchant for talking about "twats" and "cunts". It's how they view women. Consider the misogynist Bill Maher? I would never expect liberals to accept women as equals.

[garyo]

I'm sure if MSNBC had come out with this it would have been OK, right moron?

[garyo]

Gee, what happened to Dakota?