View Full Version : Gingrich: Trump's Twitter use to affect foreign policy is "brilliant!"
Newt: Whether it's brilliant or stupid .. get used to it.
Chris Wallace: So which is it?
Newt: It's BRILLIANT!! :rolleyes:
Freaking Newt is losing his mind
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/newt-gingrich-trump-will-continue-to-tweet-no-matter-whether-its-brilliant-or-stupid-so-get-used-to-it/
Peter1469
12-25-2016, 01:11 PM
If you can die from shitting the bed, I am worried for you.
hanger4
12-25-2016, 01:16 PM
Are the words "foreign policy" used Bo-4 ?? NO, wass-up with that Bo ??
stjames1_53
12-25-2016, 01:20 PM
Are the words "foreign policy" used @Bo-4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1297) ?? NO, wass-up with that Bo ??
as usual, Bo-4 is taking a minuscule event and turning it into a doomsday scenario by adding his comments as if they really happened....
Chris
12-25-2016, 01:26 PM
Trump Tweets, Liberals Go Nuclear (https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/trump-tweets-liberals-go-nuclear-weapons/)
Donald Trump has done it again. The president-elect has taken to his Twitter account to articulate a shift in American national-security policy with grave geopolitical implications that cannot be understated. At least, that’s what the left would have you believe. This increasingly rote response represents another chapter in the voluminous annals of liberal overreaction to the president-elect’s social-media musings.
“The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes,” wrote President-elect Trump on Thursday. When it comes to Trump and Twitter, the left is already on edge. Add nuclear weapons to the mix, and you have a recipe for a stage-four meltdown.
Who knows what inspired the tweet or what Trump precisely meant by it? This assertion might have been the result of a meeting Trump took with Pentagon officials on Wednesday, including the Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration. Or it may have been Trump’s response to having been briefed on the results of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s year-end meeting with defense chiefs in which the Russian autocrat pledged a nuclear-modernization push in 2017.
Trump was clearly avoiding specificity and to identify a detailed policy proposal in this tweet requires some divination on the part of individual observers. That didn’t stop the left from both dissecting this tweet and coming to one preordained conclusion: “We’re all going to die.”...
Are the words "foreign policy" used @Bo-4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1297) ?? NO, wass-up with that Bo ??
So the ones he fired off to China about the drone, Israel (at Netty's urging) and about greatly strengthening and expanding our nuke capability didn't involve foreign policy?
:confused:
https://67.media.tumblr.com/92133b3fa2252fd033d2f7f611b247d1/tumblr_inline_n9jqedE7V01sa66n9.jpg
Does anyone else honestly believe that past policy of US and Russia REDUCING the number of nukes we has "failed".
I mean seriously, do you really want to start another arms race :confused:
The US alone already has 5,000 of the things .. or enough to destroy the planet many times over.
I don't make this stuff up folks - it flies out of Newt and his pal Trumpf's mouths at random.
~~~
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/newt-gingrich/) praised the style and substance of Donald Trump (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump/)’s suggestion for a new nuclear arms race (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-terrifyings-clarification-on-nukes-tweet-let-it-be-an-arms-race_us_585d15f2e4b0d9a59457f39b?kg761txzhq0hehfr) , calling the president-elect’s use of Twitter to make major policy pronouncements “brilliant.”
Gingrich, an informal Trump adviser, told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that the longstanding U.S. policy of reducing the number of its nuclear weapons has “failed.” He claimed that it has enabled former Cold War (http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cold-war-history) foes China (http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/china-joins-a-bomb-club), North Korea (https://web.archive.org/web/20130425162315/http://americansecurityproject.org/ASP Reports/Ref 0072 - North Korea’s Nuclear Program .pdf) and Russia (http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/) to rebuild or expand their capacities.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/newt-gingrich-trump-twitter-brilliant_us_585fd733e4b0d9a594589496?1he5oax5mm25 xnipb9
stjames1_53
12-25-2016, 01:41 PM
Does anyone else honestly believe that past policy of US and Russia REDUCING the number of nukes we has "failed".
I mean seriously, do you really want to start another arms race :confused:
The US alone already has 5,000 of the things .. or enough to destroy the planet many times over.
I don't make this stuff up folks - it flies out of Newt and his pal Trumpf's mouths at random.
~~~
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/newt-gingrich/) praised the style and substance of Donald Trump (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump/)’s suggestion for a new nuclear arms race (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-terrifyings-clarification-on-nukes-tweet-let-it-be-an-arms-race_us_585d15f2e4b0d9a59457f39b?kg761txzhq0hehfr) , calling the president-elect’s use of Twitter to make major policy pronouncements “brilliant.”
Gingrich, an informal Trump adviser, told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that the longstanding U.S. policy of reducing the number of its nuclear weapons has “failed.” He claimed that it has enabled former Cold War (http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cold-war-history) foes China (http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/china-joins-a-bomb-club), North Korea (https://web.archive.org/web/20130425162315/http://americansecurityproject.org/ASP Reports/Ref 0072 - North Korea’s Nuclear Program .pdf) and Russia (http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/) to rebuild or expand their capacities.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/newt-gingrich-trump-twitter-brilliant_us_585fd733e4b0d9a594589496?1he5oax5mm25 xnipb9
we know.............you wanted Hillary to do this...on her one and only device...............
and you make up every post you put up..............
hanger4
12-25-2016, 01:45 PM
So the ones he fired off to China about the drone, Israel (at Netty's urging) and about greatly strengthening and expanding our nuke capability didn't involve foreign policy?
:confused:
https://67.media.tumblr.com/92133b3fa2252fd033d2f7f611b247d1/tumblr_inline_n9jqedE7V01sa66n9.jpg
Your link had nothing to do with foreign policy Bo-4 It was about twitter use in general. The only denial involved is your insistence that you don't need reading comprehension classes.
we know.............you wanted Hillary to do this...on her one and only device...............
and you make up every post you put up..............
^^^ Hillary - WTF? ^^^
Get back to me when you can show that had it not been for your stupid bathroom bill, you'd have been mandated to spend billions adding transgender bathrooms in all public buildings.
Take your time
hanger4
12-25-2016, 01:49 PM
Does anyone else honestly believe that past policy of US and Russia REDUCING the number of nukes we has "failed".
I mean seriously, do you really want to start another arms race :confused:
The US alone already has 5,000 of the things .. or enough to destroy the planet many times over.
I don't make this stuff up folks - it flies out of Newt and his pal Trumpf's mouths at random.
~~~
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/newt-gingrich/) praised the style and substance of Donald Trump (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump/)’s suggestion for a new nuclear arms race (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-terrifyings-clarification-on-nukes-tweet-let-it-be-an-arms-race_us_585d15f2e4b0d9a59457f39b?kg761txzhq0hehfr) , calling the president-elect’s use of Twitter to make major policy pronouncements “brilliant.”
Gingrich, an informal Trump adviser, told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that the longstanding U.S. policy of reducing the number of its nuclear weapons has “failed.” He claimed that it has enabled former Cold War (http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cold-war-history) foes China (http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/china-joins-a-bomb-club), North Korea (https://web.archive.org/web/20130425162315/http://americansecurityproject.org/ASP Reports/Ref 0072 - North Korea’s Nuclear Program .pdf) and Russia (http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/) to rebuild or expand their capacities.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/newt-gingrich-trump-twitter-brilliant_us_585fd733e4b0d9a594589496?1he5oax5mm25 xnipb9
What part of we reduce, while our foes rebuild and or expand is a failure didn't you understand ??
Mister D
12-25-2016, 01:50 PM
Does anyone else honestly believe that past policy of US and Russia REDUCING the number of nukes we has "failed".
I mean seriously, do you really want to start another arms race :confused:
The US alone already has 5,000 of the things .. or enough to destroy the planet many times over.
I don't make this stuff up folks - it flies out of Newt and his pal Trumpf's mouths at random.
~~~
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/newt-gingrich/) praised the style and substance of Donald Trump (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump/)’s suggestion for a new nuclear arms race (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-terrifyings-clarification-on-nukes-tweet-let-it-be-an-arms-race_us_585d15f2e4b0d9a59457f39b?kg761txzhq0hehfr) , calling the president-elect’s use of Twitter to make major policy pronouncements “brilliant.”
Gingrich, an informal Trump adviser, told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that the longstanding U.S. policy of reducing the number of its nuclear weapons has “failed.” He claimed that it has enabled former Cold War (http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cold-war-history) foes China (http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/china-joins-a-bomb-club), North Korea (https://web.archive.org/web/20130425162315/http://americansecurityproject.org/ASP Reports/Ref 0072 - North Korea’s Nuclear Program .pdf) and Russia (http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/) to rebuild or expand their capacities.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/newt-gingrich-trump-twitter-brilliant_us_585fd733e4b0d9a594589496?1he5oax5mm25 xnipb9
I was wondering where all of this liberal aggression toward Russia was heading. Do you really not see any irony in your comments? You have been enthusiastic about ratcheting up the anti-Russian rhetoric but you're concerned about another arms race?
Your link had nothing to do with foreign policy @Bo-4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1297) It was about twitter use in general. The only denial involved is your insistence that you don't need reading comprehension classes.
You know and i know that Trump's tweets run the gamut of stupidity:
People who say mean things about him
The dishonest media
The weight of former beauty contestants
The ugliness of Arianna Huffington
Firing Obama for high gas prices (really)
Wind turbines have killed all the birds
Obama playing basketball is why our country is in trouble
The Chinese created the global warming hoax
Domestic policy
And yep
FOREIGN POLICY
Sure Newt - his tweets are F-ing brilliant!
suds00
12-25-2016, 01:55 PM
putin knows what he's doing in this nuclear board game.trump never will.
What part of we reduce, while our foes rebuild and or expand is a failure didn't you understand ??
The part where it's a lie. Russia reduced - WE reduced.
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USRussiaNuclearAgreementsMarch2010
resister
12-25-2016, 01:57 PM
I was wondering where all of this liberal aggression toward Russia was heading. Do you really not see any irony in your comments? You have been enthusiastic about ratcheting up the anti-Russian rhetoric but you're concerned about another arms race?
Somewhat ironic
putin knows what he's doing in this nuclear board game.trump never will.
Per usual, Poot is blowing smoke .. they can't afford to get in an arms race.
I was wondering where all of this liberal aggression toward Russia was heading. Do you really not see any irony in your comments? You have been enthusiastic about ratcheting up the anti-Russian rhetoric but you're concerned about another arms race?
Trump hinted at another arms race .. not i.
Merry Christmas D
hanger4
12-25-2016, 02:14 PM
You know and i know that Trump's tweets run the gamut of stupidity:
People who say mean things about him
The dishonest media
The weight of former beauty contestants
The ugliness of Arianna Huffington
Firing Obama for high gas prices (really)
Wind turbines have killed all the birds
Obama playing basketball is why our country is in trouble
The Chinese created the global warming hoax
Domestic policy
And yep
FOREIGN POLICY
Sure Newt - his tweets are F-ing brilliant!
"Gingrich: Trump's Twitter use to affect foreign policy is "brilliant!"
Your header is untrue yet again.
Chris
12-25-2016, 02:14 PM
I was wondering where all of this liberal aggression toward Russia was heading. Do you really not see any irony in your comments? You have been enthusiastic about ratcheting up the anti-Russian rhetoric but you're concerned about another arms race?
Because it's Trump and not Clinton. If Trump changed his mind, he'd be criticized for that.
Your link had nothing to do with foreign policy @Bo-4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1297) It was about twitter use in general. The only denial involved is your insistence that you don't need reading comprehension classes.
No, if Newt believes Trump's tweeting is brilliant - then he embraces the ones regarding foreign policy.
resister
12-25-2016, 02:15 PM
"Gingrich: Trump's Twitter use to affect foreign policy is "brilliant!"
Your header is untrue yet again.Liesalot is on a roll today
Subdermal
12-25-2016, 02:18 PM
putin knows what he's doing in this nuclear board game.trump never will.
You'll never understand what Trump is doing either. He's ingratiating himself to a nuclear power in a strategic gamut to increase his influence in their actions.
But keep bleating, by all means. Obama's strategy wrt Russia was obviously flawless. :rolleyes:
You'll never understand what Trump is doing either. He's ingratiating himself to a nuclear power in a strategic gamut to increase his influence in their actions.
But keep bleating, by all means. Obama's strategy wrt Russia was obviously flawless. :rolleyes:
LoL - :D
https://badserviceatvivakiamitsubishisuzuki.files.wordpres s.com/2013/06/sucker.jpg
And much if not most of it just may work! :evil:
https://www.bustle.com/p/obama-is-trying-hard-to-donald-trump-proof-the-white-house-it-might-work-25711
He should also take 1000 or so nukes off "hair-trigger" alert:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-cirincione/keep-donald-trumps-finger_b_13770226.html
hanger4
12-25-2016, 02:34 PM
No, if Newt believes Trump's tweeting is brilliant - then he embraces the ones regarding foreign policy.
Still pushing Logan Act BS I see.
Still pushing Logan Act BS I see.
You see it as BS .. many legal experts do not.
It simply needs to be clarified by including verbiage about presidents-elect.
resister
12-25-2016, 02:39 PM
You see it as BS .. many legal experts do not.
It simply needs to be clarified by including verbiage about presidents-elect.
Write your representative.
hanger4
12-25-2016, 02:41 PM
You see it as BS .. many legal experts do not.
It simply needs to be clarified by including verbiage about presidents-elect.
HuffyPosts so called legal experts are partisan hacks. Answer the question Bo, why isn't our illustrious AG all over it ??
Write your representative.
No need, the bill is already in the works and may even be enacted.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6511/text
Many Congressional Republicans have expressed concern about his stupid, impulsive and ill-considered tweets regarding foreign policy.
resister
12-25-2016, 02:49 PM
Many Congressional Republicans have expressed concern about his stupid, impulsive and ill-considered tweets regarding foreign policy.
Such as who?Or is this a "feeling" you have?
Chris
12-25-2016, 02:53 PM
No need, the bill is already in the works and may even be enacted.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6511/text
Many Congressional Republicans have expressed concern about his stupid, impulsive and ill-considered tweets regarding foreign policy.
He's anti-establishment in that sense.
hanger4
12-25-2016, 02:54 PM
No need, the bill is already in the works and may even be enacted.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6511/text
Many Congressional Republicans have expressed concern about his stupid, impulsive and ill-considered tweets regarding foreign policy.
So the Logan Act has been clearly violated yet new legislation needs to be enacted ??
Lawdy
So the Logan Act has been clearly violated yet new legislation needs to be enacted ??
Lawdy
In my opinion and the opinion of many it has been clearly violated.
The language needs to be cleaned up.
resister
12-25-2016, 02:59 PM
In my opinion and the opinion of many it has been clearly violated.
The language needs to be cleaned up.
Who's cursin?:laugh:
hanger4
12-25-2016, 03:00 PM
In my opinion and the opinion of many it has been clearly violated.
The language needs to be cleaned up.
And yet the US AG does nothing.
Get a clue Bo-4
Such as who?Or is this a "feeling" you have?
Google is your friend - i am not your errand boy
resister
12-25-2016, 03:04 PM
Google is your friend - i am not your errand boy
Just sayin,you have been less than honest today.
AZ Jim
12-25-2016, 03:17 PM
Make fun of Bo now but just wait, and watch. He would be laughing later except it won't be a laughing matter.
Make fun of Bo now but just wait, and watch. He would be laughing later except it won't be a laughing matter.
Good call Jim. Better to laugh at Donnie Dumpster now .. and not after his new cold war begins.
Captain Obvious
12-25-2016, 03:19 PM
Make fun of Bo now but just wait, and watch. He would be laughing later except it won't be a laughing matter.
Bo's a nice guy but he's very gullible.
Unfortunately his actual good points he's made get drowned out by all the nonsense he distributes.
Mister D
12-25-2016, 04:12 PM
Trump hinted at another arms race .. not i.
Merry Christmas D
You're demanding one.
Merry Christmas, Bo. :smiley:
Captain Obvious
12-25-2016, 04:14 PM
You're demanding one.
Merry Christmas, Bo. :smiley:
It's why Putin fixed the election, they want an arms race.
To stimulate their economy of course.
MisterVeritis
12-25-2016, 06:25 PM
Does anyone else honestly believe that past policy of US and Russia REDUCING the number of nukes we has "failed".
I mean seriously, do you really want to start another arms race :confused:
The US alone already has 5,000 of the things .. or enough to destroy the planet many times over.
I don't make this stuff up folks - it flies out of Newt and his pal Trumpf's mouths at random.
~~~
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/newt-gingrich/) praised the style and substance of Donald Trump (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump/)’s suggestion for a new nuclear arms race (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-terrifyings-clarification-on-nukes-tweet-let-it-be-an-arms-race_us_585d15f2e4b0d9a59457f39b?kg761txzhq0hehfr) , calling the president-elect’s use of Twitter to make major policy pronouncements “brilliant.”
Gingrich, an informal Trump adviser, told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that the longstanding U.S. policy of reducing the number of its nuclear weapons has “failed.” He claimed that it has enabled former Cold War (http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cold-war-history) foes China (http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/china-joins-a-bomb-club), North Korea (https://web.archive.org/web/20130425162315/http://americansecurityproject.org/ASP Reports/Ref 0072 - North Korea’s Nuclear Program .pdf) and Russia (http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/) to rebuild or expand their capacities.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/newt-gingrich-trump-twitter-brilliant_us_585fd733e4b0d9a594589496?1he5oax5mm25 xnipb9
You know very little.
Russia and China have modernized their weapon systems. We have not.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.