Kellyanne Conway gets Secret Service protection

[Cigar]

http://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Screen-Shot-2016-11-13-at-11.35.56-AM.png (http://www.thewrap.com/kellyanne-conway-donald-trump-alternative-facts-merriam-webster/)

Top President Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway has received mail with a suspicious white powder in them and has been assigned Secret Service protection, she told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night.

"Because of what the press is doing now to me, I have Secret Service protection," Conway said, citing the way the media has covered her boss as the reason for the threats. "We have packages delivered to my house with white substances. That is a shame."

Conway said the need for a security detail stems from the media coverage of Trump and his administration, though she did not say whether anyone else in the Trump administration has received similar pieces of mail.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kellyanne-conway-gets-secret-service-protection/ar-AAma8aW?li=BBnb7Kz

Gag Reflex ...

[Safety]

"because of what the press is doing now to me...."

Why are we living in this alternate universe where, before conservatives touted personal responsibility, but now it's always someone else's fault?

[Subdermal]

"because of what the press is doing now to me...."

Why are we living in this alternate universe where, before conservatives touted personal responsibility, but now it's always someone else's fault?
Uh...it's the whole "when someone else actually does something" thing.

You, of course, wouldn't have the first clue about integrity, and how to demonstrate it, so that doubtless explains your utter confusion.

[Cigar]

Uh...it's the whole "when someone else actually does something" thing.

You, of course, wouldn't have the first clue about integrity, and how to demonstrate it, so that doubtless explains your utter confusion.

Yea we saw a lot of that over the last 8 years ... :laugh:

I thought the Right was tougher than that, they spend 8 years dishing out dirt and now they play the Victim.

Personally I say, F'ckem ... https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/--Wbfy6oNpd0/VG7zb-RUTmI/AAAAAAAAIBA/rru8WWCK_Jc/s400/tiny%2Bviolin.png (http://satireknight.blogspot.com/2015/08/new-moon-chapter-4.html)

[Subdermal]

Yea we saw a lot of that over the last 8 years ... :laugh:

Your utter confusion? It continues.


I thought the Right was tougher than that, they spend 8 years dishing out dirt and now they play the Victim.

Personally I say, F'ckem ... https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/--Wbfy6oNpd0/VG7zb-RUTmI/AAAAAAAAIBA/rru8WWCK_Jc/s400/tiny%2Bviolin.png (http://satireknight.blogspot.com/2015/08/new-moon-chapter-4.html)

:facepalm:

When a Presidential staff member is threatened, it is protocol to provide protection. What is notably absent from your response is a condemnation to the person who sent this suspicious powder. Do you have the integrity to do so? You haven't shown it.

What part of that is 'playing the victim', again?

[Safety]

Uh...it's the whole "when someone else actually does something" thing.

You, of course, wouldn't have the first clue about integrity, and how to demonstrate it, so that doubtless explains your utter confusion.

Is your default position to always attack a member personally when they, first, have not even engaged you, second, posted a comment that does not involve you, third, the comment goes against your ideology?

[Cigar]

Your utter confusion? It continues.



:facepalm:

When a Presidential staff member is threatened, it is protocol to provide protection. What is notably absent from your response is a condemnation to the person who sent this suspicious powder. Do you have the integrity to do so? You haven't shown it.

What part of that is 'playing the victim', again?


She walk down the street Butt Naked and The Sewer Rats would cross the street and hide.

[Subdermal]

Is your default position to always attack a member personally when they, first, have not even engaged you, second, posted a comment that does not involve you, third, the comment goes against your ideology?
Aw. Tums?

Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice.

[Subdermal]

She walk down the street Butt Naked and The Sewer Rats would cross the street and hide.
Of course you would. You're dragging your thread down there with you as well I see.

[Safety]

Aw. Tums?

Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice.
Captain Obvious Common Private Pickle

This isn't a case of "when in rome", this is the type of response this member defaults to since their arrival here.

[Cigar]

Of course you would. You're dragging your thread down there with you as well I see.

I got an Idea, how about you Guard her Body :grin:

[Cigar]

Conway punched a man 3 times at inaugural ball

Source: The Hill
Top Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway punched a man after stepping in to try to stop a fight at an invite-only inaugural ball on Friday, according to a new report Tuesday.

The New York Daily News reported that witnesses saw Conway punch a man in the face at least three times at the exclusive Liberty Ball in Washington just hours after President Trump was sworn in to office.

A Trump spokesman did not respond immediately for a request for comment.

Conway reportedly stepped between two men who were fighting and punched one of them when they wouldn’t stop. Fox Business correspondent Charlie Gasparino recounted the event on Monday in a Facebook post.

http://www.thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/315811-conway-allegedly-punched-a-man-three-times-at-inauguration-ball


Looks like she take care of herself ... :laugh: you take the Woman out of the Park ... but ...

[Captain Obvious]

Captain Obvious Common Private Pickle

This isn't a case of "when in rome", this is the type of response this member defaults to since their arrival here.

Point out one of (pretty much all) Cigar or Bo's far worse and you will make one small step toward credibility.

Consedering you are a heckler, especially when del is around are you really surprised that you get these reactions out of others?

What was that you were saying about being aware of one's surroundings?

[Cigar]

Point out one of (pretty much all) Cigar or Bo's far worse and you will make one small step toward credibility.

Consedering you are a heckler, especially when del is around are you really surprised that you get these reactions out of others?

What was that you were saying about being aware of one's surroundings?
Welcome to the last 8 years of President Obama supporters ... Man-Up and taking like one.

[Safety]

Point out one of (pretty much all) Cigar or Bo's far worse and you will make one small step toward credibility.

Consedering you are a heckler, especially when del is around are you really surprised that you get these reactions out of others?

What was that you were saying about being aware of one's surroundings?

Still non-responsive, even after I hoped you could drop your personal issue you have with me to address the part "Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice."

He didn't say it was because of my behavior or because I insulted him earlier. It was partisan, and now you are justifying that partisanship, while at the exact same time wanting sanctions placed on cigar and Bo for their partisanship.

That is the problem.

[Private Pickle]

@Captain Obvious (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=3) @Common (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=659) @Private Pickle (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=615)

This isn't a case of "when in rome", this is the type of response this member defaults to since their arrival here.

Do you seriously want us to mention you every time a libby goes off the rails?

Do yourself a favor...stop worrying about the "score".

[AZ Jim]

While I don't in any way approve of the mail harassment (or other forms of attack), I must say she makes herself a hate magnet when she appears and lies to our faces. She has a "you all are so stupid" smile on her face when she does it.

[Captain Obvious]

Still non-responsive, even after I hoped you could drop your personal issue you have with me to address the part "Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice."

He didn't say it was because of my behavior or because I insulted him earlier. It was partisan, and now you are justifying that partisanship, while at the exact same time wanting sanctions placed on cigar and Bo for their partisanship.

That is the problem.

I went after the macs and ransoms for baiting and heckling.

The day you confront Cigar will be your first. Until then I have no use for you.

Hint: there is a good example a few posts up.

[Private Pickle]

Still non-responsive, even after I hoped you could drop your personal issue you have with me to address the part "Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice."

He didn't say it was because of my behavior or because I insulted him earlier. It was partisan, and now you are justifying that partisanship, while at the exact same time wanting sanctions placed on cigar and Bo for their partisanship.

That is the problem.
He said it was because it was a lie...

[Bo-4]

Because of what the press is doing to her?

LoL - If she and the boss would stop saying stupid stuff .. maybe the press wouldn't repeat it?

:cool2:

https://i.imgflip.com/1i5h6f.jpg

[Safety]

I went after the macs and ransoms for baiting and heckling.

The day you confront Cigar will be your first. Until then I have no use for you.

Hint: there is a good example a few posts up.

That's a lie, I have confronted Cigar many times, in fact there was once where I mentioned you and mister d on a post he made where I chastised him.

[Safety]

Do you seriously want us to mention you every time a libby goes off the rails?

Do yourself a favor...stop worrying about the "score".


Did you not start this "score" keeping? Who mentioned whom first?

[Private Pickle]

Did you not start this "score" keeping? Who mentioned whom first?

Errr....you mentioned me and showed me a post of a member calling you out on a lie...

[Crepitus]

"because of what the press is doing now to me...."

Why are we living in this alternate universe where, before conservatives touted personal responsibility, but now it's always someone else's fault?

Because it's OK if you are a conservative.

[Crepitus]

Uh...it's the whole "when someone else actually does something" thing.

You, of course, wouldn't have the first clue about integrity, and how to demonstrate it, so that doubtless explains your utter confusion.

And again, the conservatives go straight to the personal attack.

[Crepitus]

While I don't in any way approve of the mail harassment (or other forms of attack), I must say she makes herself a hate magnet when she appears and lies to our faces. She has a "you all are so stupid" smile on her face when she does it.

She's not lying, those are alternative facts.

[birddog]

I worship Kellyanne for how she helped Trump get elected. She is always honest, and deserves to be Woman Of The Year. Libs hate her, but that's a good thing.:grin:

[Safety]

Errr....you mentioned me and showed me a post of a member calling you out on a lie...

Yea, you can only take this thread into account, but not the threads three or four days ago where you mentioned me. This is the reason why we will never see eye to eye.

[Private Pickle]

Yea, you can only take this thread into account, but not the threads three or four days ago where you mentioned me. This is the reason why we will never see eye to eye.

You blew off the one thread I mentioned you in. Which is why I said it was going to be a complete waste of time in the first place. Didn't believe me? Well perhaps maybe now you will...

[Safety]

You blew off the one thread I mentioned you in. Which is why I said it was going to be a complete waste of time in the first place. Didn't believe me? Well perhaps maybe now you will...

Well, at least you admit that you mentioned me. That would make it before I mentioned you in this thread, therefore, who started keeping score?

[Bo-4]

I worship Kellyanne for how she helped Trump get elected. She is always honest, and deserves to be Woman Of The Year. Libs hate her, but that's a good thing.:grin:

I LOVE her .. endlessly entertaining.

In fact, i'm thinking of creating a Kellyanne shrine with scented candles and stuff.

:D

[birddog]

I LOVE her .. endlessly entertaining.

In fact, i'm thinking of creating a Kellyanne shrine with scented candles and stuff.

:D

Sometimes sarcasm merely validates the truth of what was posted. Thank you.

Kellyanne helped save us from the most corrupt candidate in our history, and we should all be grateful to her!

[Private Pickle]

Well, at least you admit that you mentioned me. That would make it before I mentioned you in this thread, therefore, who started keeping score?

I mentioned you because you asked me to and it was specific to Cigar... I wasn't keeping score...just proving to you what you refuse to accept as reality...

[Bo-4]

Sometimes sarcasm merely validates the truth of what was posted. Thank you.

Kellyanne helped save us from the most corrupt candidate in our history, and we should all be grateful to her!

No, that wasn't sarcasm .. she's FANTASTIC!! :grin:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb9ybImGwkU

[Ravens Fan]

Uh...it's the whole "when someone else actually does something" thing.

You, of course, wouldn't have the first clue about integrity, and how to demonstrate it, so that doubtless explains your utter confusion.

Discuss topic, not members.

[birddog]

No, that wasn't sarcasm .. she's FANTASTIC!! :grin:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb9ybImGwkU

Differentiating between reality and fantasy is not one of your strong points, I see.

I don't watch SNL, and I believe that trend will continue.

I'm glad we both love Kellyanne.:grin:

[Tahuyaman]

Kellyanne Conway gets Secret Service protection
I'm guessing that she needs to be protected from those tolerant folks who disagree with her boss on political issues.

[Common]

@Captain Obvious (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=3) @Common (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=659) @Private Pickle (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=615)

This isn't a case of "when in rome", this is the type of response this member defaults to since their arrival here.

Ok and ?

Ok I read your post that he responded too, I dont get what the big deal is, am I missing something.

Responding to a post with a response others might not like is what this is all about. If theres a direct insult or an attack that makes it altogether different.

Like for example silvereyes that just jumps into threads and attacks people and insults them and curses at them when they havent even said one word to her in a post. She just didnt do it once, she does it all the time.

I just dont see the insult to you here, did I miss something ?

http://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Safety

Is your default position to always attack a member personally when they, first, have not even engaged you, second, posted a comment that does not involve you, third, the comment goes against your ideology?
Aw. Tums?

Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice.

[Safety]

Ok and ?

Ok I read your post that he responded too, I dont get what the big deal is, am I missing something.

Responding to a post with a response others might not like is what this is all about. If theres a direct insult or an attack that makes it altogether different.

Like for example silvereyes that just jumps into threads and attacks people and insults them and curses at them when they havent even said one word to her in a post. She just didnt do it once, she does it all the time.

I just dont see the insult to you here, did I miss something ?

http://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Safety

Is your default position to always attack a member personally when they, first, have not even engaged you, second, posted a comment that does not involve you, third, the comment goes against your ideology?
Aw. Tums?

Any comment that is a lie directed at Conservatives is fair game to respond, and directly question the accuser. I did that. Get over it and respond with some integrity.

Or don't. I enjoy the target practice.

I didn't say there was an insult to me, but I was highlighting his response about how he is allowed to insult because of a slight to conservatives. The same type of behavior you and those I mentioned like to accuse the left of.

[resister]

No, that wasn't sarcasm .. she's FANTASTIC!! :grin:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb9ybImGwkU
SNL...the new lefty, news, source! Good times, had by all !!

[resister]

I didn't say there was an insult to me, but I was highlighting his response about how he is allowed to insult because of a slight to conservatives. The same type of behavior you and those I mentioned like to accuse the left of.
Tissue?

[Safety]

Tissue?

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

[resister]

Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.
Tissue?

[Safety]

Tissue?

Rainman?

[resister]

Rainman?Tissue?

[Safety]

Getting creepy....

[resister]

Getting creepy....Tissue?

[Captain Obvious]

lawlz

[Safety]

lapdog going to be a lapdog.

[crowonapost]

What a waste.

[gamewell45]

http://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Screen-Shot-2016-11-13-at-11.35.56-AM.png (http://www.thewrap.com/kellyanne-conway-donald-trump-alternative-facts-merriam-webster/)

Top President Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway has received mail with a suspicious white powder in them and has been assigned Secret Service protection, she told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night.

"Because of what the press is doing now to me, I have Secret Service protection," Conway said, citing the way the media has covered her boss as the reason for the threats. "We have packages delivered to my house with white substances. That is a shame."

Conway said the need for a security detail stems from the media coverage of Trump and his administration, though she did not say whether anyone else in the Trump administration has received similar pieces of mail.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kellyanne-conway-gets-secret-service-protection/ar-AAma8aW?li=BBnb7Kz

Gag Reflex ...

If she is getting threats against her, then she should be afforded protection until it is deemed no longer necessary. It's important to remember that there are a lot of nutt jobs out there.

[Captain Obvious]

If she is getting threats against her, then she should be afforded protection until it is deemed no longer necessary. It's important to remember that there are a lot of nutt jobs out there.

The implication here from the partisan hack left is "let her get whacked".

It's par for the course for how the classless left has conducted themselves.

[resister]

If she is getting threats against her, then she should be afforded protection until it is deemed no longer necessary. It's important to remember that there are a lot of nutt jobs out there.She's a hot cougar, I don't wanna hurt her....c'mere you!

[Bethere]

If she is getting threats against her, then she should be afforded protection until it is deemed no longer necessary. It's important to remember that there are a lot of nutt jobs out there.

She could cackle, kill a chicken, and dance backwards around an inverted pentagram and we would all turn into frogs.

[valley ranch]

Some o yous are half way there!

[resister]

Some o yous are half way there!
He just don't know a hot cougar when she puurrrrssss :grin:

[birddog]

Kellyanne is a "Nifty Fifty!" We should all worship her for her accomplishments.

[Bethere]

Kellyanne is a "Nifty Fifty!" We should all worship her for her accomplishments.

Not me. Please don't speak for me. I think she is reprehensible.