PDA

View Full Version : At Boeing, Pay-to-Play is the Rule of the Day



ironboltbruce
10-12-2011, 09:51 AM
AT BOEING, PAY-TO-PLAY IS THE RULE OF THE DAY
Global Revolution 1: American Revolution 2: Day 26: Communication 1
12 Oct 2011 (g1a2d0026c1)


"Boeing is the world's top manufacturer of commercial airplanes, including the 767 and the 747. The company is also a leading military supplier, making fighter bombers, transport planes and the Apache helicopter. The company regularly lobbies Congress to increase defense spending and to win military contracts, although it lost the $300 billion Joint Strike Fighter contract to rival Lockheed Martin in 2001. Boeing has also supported expanding free trade, especially in Asia, where it hopes to sell more commercial aircraft. The company also pushed for Congress to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank, which gives loan guarantees to businesses. In 2001, Boeing got $2.5 billion from the bank."

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?cycle=A&type=P&id=D000000100

"Defense aerospace contractors concentrate their political donations on members of the House and Senate Appropriations subcommittees that allocate federal defense money. Prime targets of defense aerospace money also include members of the Armed Services committees, who influence military policy and have the power to create demand for this industry's commodities... During the 2008 election cycle, the industry donated more than $7.5 million to federal candidates, splitting their contributions almost evenly between Republicans and Democrats... Boeing placed a close second to Lockheed in campaign contributions for the 2008 cycle, at more than $2.1 million. Of that, 56 percent went toward Democrats and 43 percent to Republicans.

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/background.php?id=D01&year=2010

"The federal government's selection of Boeing to build the next generation of Air Force aerial refueling tankers comes after years of contentious fighting that's resulted in sky-high lobbying spending and accelerated campaign contributions to key politicians.... [ In 2010 alone, ] Boeing spent more than $17.8 million on lobbying expenditures, placing it first among companies in the defense aerospace industry... During the 2010 election cycle, Boeing's political action committee spent more than $2.91 million, donating more than $2.1 million of that amount to federal candidates... Much of this money has gone toward members of Congress who stand to benefit politically from the KC-X tanker program:"

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/02/boeing-eads.html

This is not the first time Boeing used payola to pocket an Air Force tanker contract. But thanks to the United States Supreme Court "Citizens United v. FEC" decision, corporations can now make grease payments over the table that used to slide under. Consider, for example, how Boeing won and lost its previous tanker contract:

"In May 2003, the United States Air Force announced it would lease 100 KC-767 tankers to replace the oldest 136 of its KC-135s. The 10 year lease would give the USAF the option to purchase the aircraft at the end of the contract. In September 2003, responding to critics who argued that the lease was vastly more expensive than an outright purchase, the United States Department of Defense announced a revised lease. In November 2003, the Air Force decided it would lease 20 KC-767 aircraft and purchase 80 tankers... Buying one KC-767 outright costs $150 million. The contract called for 100 aircraft being purchased or leased at an aggregate price of $26b, or $260m per plane. Therefore, the contract, if it had been executed, would have forced the DOD to pay Boeing much more money for each plane than it would have had to if the aircraft were purchased individually... In December 2003, the Pentagon announced the project was to be frozen while an investigation of allegations of corruption by [Pentagon purchasing agent] Darleen Druyun (who had moved to Boeing in January 2003) was begun. Druyun pleaded guilty to inflating the price of the contract to favor her future employer and to passing information on the competing Airbus A330 MRTT bid (from EADS). In October 2004, she was sentenced to nine months in jail for corruption, fined $5,000, given three years of supervised release and 150 hours of community service. She began her prison term on January 5, 2005. She was released from prison on September 30, 2005. The ramifications extended to Boeing CFO Michael M. Sears, who was fired from Boeing, and Boeing CEO Phil Condit resigned. On February 18, 2005, Sears was sentenced to four months in prison. Boeing ended up paying a $615 million fine for their involvement. According to The Federal Times, Darleen Druyun will still be receiving a federal pension."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darleen_Druyun

CBS News called this "the biggest Pentagon scandal in 20 years", but for Boeing it was just one of many:

http://www.contractormisconduct.org/index.cfm/1,73,221,html?ContractorID=13&ranking=2

And as far as Pentagon scandals go, this one was a drop in the bucket compared to Donald Rumsfeld's adeptly timed confessions of 10 September 2001:

1 DAY BEFORE 911 WTC attack! DO u know what happened?WATCH! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnQTcLHaMM#)


Related Images:

http://blog.al.com/pr/2008/06/tanker_battle_funny_stuff.html

Related Video:

Arsenal of Hypocrisy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOPbS6H0HEo#)


###

I AM NOT ANONYMOUS. I AM AN AMERICAN.

I am not just a Consumer. I am a Citizen.

I will no longer be labeled Left or Right, Liberal or Conservative, Demopublican or Republocrat.

I will no longer follow Puppets labeled Left or Right, Liberal or Conservative, Demopublican or Republocrat.

I am the People. And I am coming for the Puppetmasters.

I am part of the 99 Percent. And I demand the following:

1. End the Fed.

2. Reverse Citizens United.

3. Repeal PATRIOT Act.

4. Expose 9/11 Truth.

5. End Profit Wars.

6. Refund Taxpayer Trillions.

7. Imprison the Kleptocrats.

8. Single Term Limits.


###

LABELS (A POEM OF PROTEST)

"Democrat", "Republican",
The parties of the system;
Puppets both, for sale their votes,
No character or wisdom.

"Liberal", "Conservative",
For change or status quo?
Pick either one, the change is none,
All charlatans and whores.

Far "Left" we place the Anarchists,
Libertarians claim far "Right";
Yet both decry the government:
False continuum brought to light.

For oil, "We" bomb their mud huts,
Strip them bare, then offer "Aid";
And fake their retribution as
Pretext - a false flag raised.

Unarmed hundred thousands killed
By weapons of "Defense",
While rights are lost for "Freedom" sake -
On profit, all depends.

With stroke of pen, the "Patriot" Act,
And patriots' gifts are taken;
Then "Citizens United" leaves
Our citizens forsaken.

We protest loss of liberties,
Put "World Wide Web" to use;
Cloudmark Authority censors us
For "messaging abuse".

They label us to finger-point,
With labels, "They" deride us;
Their labels keep us all at bay,
For with labels, "They" divide us.

IronBoltBruce


###

JOIN THE GLOBAL REVOLUTION!

Occupy Wall Street:

globalrevolution - live streaming video powered by Livestream (http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution)

http://occupywallst.org/

Occupy DC:

october2011 (http://www.ustream.tv/channel/october2011#)

http://october2011.org/

Occupy LA:

Occupy Wall Street Los Angeles - live streaming video powered by Livestream (http://www.livestream.com/owslosangeles)

http://occupylosangeles.org/

Occupy Together:

http://occupytogether.org/

Watch these Videos:

http://tinyurl.com/kleptocracytutorial

Take this Pledge:

http://wp.me/p19dS3-9o


###

PUBLIC NOTICE: No talking heads on Comcast/GE's NBC/CNBC/MSNBC speak for us. No talking heads on Murdoch's Faux News speak for us. No talking heads at the Kleptocracy's Compliant News Network (CNN) speak for us (no matter how dull, deliberate or subtle their delivery). No talking heads in the lamestream media speak for us, period. And neither do ANY of the 537 bought-and-paid-for Kleptocracy puppets in Washington DC who will soon be joining our legions of unemployed!

MMC
10-12-2011, 10:03 AM
Arent the 99%-ers.....an off shoot of the 33 and a 1/3rd of the Freemasons. Sounds more Illuminati than American Patritoism.

In Defense of Boeing if they have one.....at least those jobs were given to Americans and not shipped overseas to some other Countries Industry. Given to maintain the safety of US passengers. I think not. Should be the US of A and it's own manufacturers to do this.

As far as the Lobbying goes thats a different ball game. I could see other American companies having the right to compete for those bids. Never from any Foreign Country!

Conley
10-12-2011, 10:05 AM
Arent the 99%-ers.....an off shoot of the 33 and a 1/3rd of the Freemasons. Sounds more Illuminati than American Patritoism.

In Defense of Boeing if they have one.....at least those jobs were given to Americans and not shipped overseas to some other Countries Industry. Given to maintain the safety of US passengers. I think not. Should be the US of A and it's own manufacturers to do this.

As far as the Lobbying goes thats a different ball game. I could see other American companies having the right to compete for those bids. Never from any Foreign Country!


Good point! Better Boeing than Airbus for many reasons. #1 American and #2 Quality

MMC
10-13-2011, 01:07 AM
You are correct about labels in your creative writing. Yet we do this as a people ourselves. Even unto violence over something as petty as Sports Teams.

I myself am guilty of it. Even tho I have lived in every economic social realm there is. Not that I have gone to violence over sports. But I have over other sorts of labels. Which is why I do not think the racial label is as prevalent anymore with the future of a civilized society. Not that such will ever be forgotten either.

Yet we are the predominant animal of our environment. We are divided by far more than a political spectrum. There is urban vs rural. City vs country. Like it or not the Rich from both these two different realms of a civilized society are quite different in nature. Just as the poor from both are. Then there is the breakdown within each of these two very different lifestyles of existence. Living right with each other in their very own environments of learned behaviour. Learned societal behaviours!