PDA

View Full Version : Susan Rice - Filthy Rich Liberal Hypocrite



Starman
04-14-2017, 12:05 PM
One of Obama's top advisors invested $600,000 in the Keystone Pipeline. If this doesn't make you sick, I don't know what it takes.
-------------------------------

www.freedomdaily.com

Susan Rice’s Net Worth Was Just Leaked And You Won’t Believe How Much She Made Being A ‘Career Politician’ (http://freedomdaily.com/susan-rices-net-worth/)by Al Waisman (http://freedomdaily.com/?author=53)


It's unbelievable how much wealth a public servant who makes a generous $172k a year (https://conservativedailypost.com/susan-rice-net-worth-exposed-50m-as-a-career-politician-making-172k-at-her-max-salary/)can accumulate.
It seems at last count good ol' UN Diplomat under President Barack Hussein Obama, Susan Rice is worth an incredible sum well over 50 million US dollars.
Now as we all know many left wing government crooks go on to make their fortunes in the private sector after they become infamous in the public arena and are run out of office. Not in Rice's case, she has always been a public servant and has managed to accumulate this humungous amount of net worth. Maybe this is what Obama meant by "Spreading the wealth around?'
Fun Fact: Susan Rice has a net worth of $50 million as a career U.S. public servant on a maximum salary of $172,000 pic.twitter.com/LMFgtdUDGY (https://t.co/LMFgtdUDGY)
— DEPLORABLE MEDIA (@correctthemedia) April 9, 2017 (https://twitter.com/correctthemedia/status/851164589945475072)

You might be asking yourself, How did she do this? How can I do the same?, or Did she write a book on how to get rich by being a public servant?
The Conservative website, Fire Andrea Mitchell (http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2012/11/28/susan-rices-net-worth-between-23-5-and-43-5-million-significant-investments-in-more-than-a-dozen-canadian-oil-companies/), states:
"Funny how leftists, who hate the rich when they are on the right side of the political spectrum, never utter a word about Susan Rice’s net worth or how she accumulated it. Not only is Susan Rice worth so much money, but she has significant investments in over a dozen Canadian oil companies. She even has a conflict of interest with her ownership stake in TransCanada. You know, that same TransCanada who is responsible for the Keystone XL pipeline that Obama nixed? Remember during the campaign how ‘bad’ it was to have investments out of the United States?"
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/xn2OzI7OYy7SOPAGKz44qwCBpA2Z5uDVKO1smHKCW6UM99Ugzr QkoGEq-myUkqp153nHPj0zlUrMHuZKkzKZTIqPd-Ag7TYUEg1D-LWoOPYraEVJwZfqTuvqyvxGGAwHjA=s0-d-e1-ft#http://freedomdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/640x392_66990_254984.jpg
According to what has been uncovered up till now Rice also stands to profit dearly from the Keystone XL Pipeline approval.
Via Conservative Daily Post (https://conservativedailypost.com/susan-rice-net-worth-exposed-50m-as-a-career-politician-making-172k-at-her-max-salary/):
"According to May 2012 financial disclosure documents, she has invested between $300,000 and $600,000 in TransCanada Corporation. The company is best known for owning the Keystone XL pipeline and they’ve recently tried to have it completed in the U.S. To finish, they need to build 1,700 miles worth of pipe from Canada to Texas. Although the Obama administration stopped the deal, Trump and his team have reversed course and approved a permit to start construction. As a major investor, Rice stands to profit immensely."
Yup, you read this correctly, it seems while Susan Rice was lying to us and trying to get one over President Trump she was profiting off oil drilling and fracking in this country. All while trying to convince everyone of us that she's a pro-environmental liberal who means well and loves "Mother Earth."

birddog
04-14-2017, 12:18 PM
She probably got advice from Hillary and Bill.

MisterVeritis
04-14-2017, 12:20 PM
She probably got advice from Hillary and Bill.
Cattle futures.

Peter1469
04-14-2017, 12:21 PM
I was going to say- Rice did better than Hillary.

resister
04-14-2017, 12:24 PM
I'm certain it was all honest, good hard work on the behalf of the American people, a true patriot!

Common Sense
04-14-2017, 12:30 PM
Her parents were quite wealthy. Rhodes scholars also tend to do pretty well for themselves.

resister
04-14-2017, 12:32 PM
Her parents were quite wealthy. Rhodes scholars also tend to do pretty well for themselves.
A real limmo liberal, eh?

Tahuyaman
04-14-2017, 12:48 PM
I was going to say- Rice did better than Hillary.

probably not percentage wise. Hillary started with basically nothing. Rice stated from a much wealthier position.

Tahuyaman
04-14-2017, 12:50 PM
Her parents were quite wealthy. Rhodes scholars also tend to do pretty well for themselves.


If liberals were consistent, they would be condemning her because she won life's lottery. You know, their thing against inhereted wealth.....

resister
04-14-2017, 12:52 PM
If liberals were consistent, they would be condemning her because she won life's lottery. You know, their thing against inhereted wealth.....Only if a R is front of her name!

MisterVeritis
04-14-2017, 04:43 PM
Her parents were quite wealthy. Rhodes scholars also tend to do pretty well for themselves.
Right. That explains how her net worth is 50 million dollars based on a salary lower than mine.

Starman
04-14-2017, 07:19 PM
Limousine Liberals are fond of calling the Republican Party "The party of the rich."

George Soros - Democrat, socialist in fact
Ted Turner - flaming liberal Democrat
Hanoi John Kerry - flaming liberal Democrat who got his money the easiest way possible - he married into it, twice
Al Gore - sold his left-wing radio station to Al Jazeera for hundreds of millions, while lying about "global warming" renamed "climate change"
The Clintons - Democrats who raked in $184 million to their "charitable (sick) foundation" just in 2014, while paying out a pitiful 2.8% to charities
The Obamas - socialist race-baiters who sold their life stories for many tens of millions to their gullible followers who don't know how to check a book out from the library
Hollywood liberals
University liberals and socialists by the thousands, such as Noam Chomsky
One is so wealthy he was suckered for $3 MILLION by a Nigerian internet scammer - a world record to be sure

Please add your most unfavorite greedy rich Democrat below. You know, like, oh, Michael Mooron.

decedent
04-14-2017, 07:34 PM
Today I learned that the far right hates Susan Rice enough to join the environmentalist movement.

Tahuyaman
04-14-2017, 07:39 PM
Today I learned that the far right hates Susan Rice enough to join the environmentalist movement.


Today, the hypocrisy of the average liberal has once again been exposed. But that happens several times a day. It's so common, no one notices any more.

decedent
04-14-2017, 07:44 PM
Today, the hypocrisy of the average liberal has once again been exposed. But that happens several times a day. It's so common, no one notices any more.

How was liberal hypocrisy exposed today?


Is it because Susan Rice invested in a pipeline that many liberals are against? This would be hypocrisy if she were an environmentalist. Cons probably think all libz are environmentalists, so I understand your spurious conclusion.

Mister D
04-14-2017, 07:49 PM
Today I learned that the far right hates Susan Rice enough to join the environmentalist movement.
Two things: 1) the US lacks anything that could be called a "far right" and 2) conservationism has long been a feature of "far right" discourse.

Mister D
04-14-2017, 07:50 PM
How was liberal hypocrisy exposed today?


Is it because Susan Rice invested in a pipeline that many liberals are against? This would be hypocrisy if she were an environmentalist. Cons probably think all libz are environmentalists, so I understand your spurious conclusion.

Environmentalism per se is fanatical and stupid.

Tahuyaman
04-14-2017, 08:03 PM
How was liberal hypocrisy exposed today?


Is it because Susan Rice invested in a pipeline that many liberals are against? This would be hypocrisy if she were an environmentalist. Cons probably think all libz are environmentalists, so I understand your spurious conclusion.


Are you serious?

Go back to the very beginning of this thread and start over.

Captain Obvious
04-14-2017, 09:41 PM
She earned her money the old fashioned way, daddy gave it to her.

And not unexpected, the left puts her up on a pedestal and worships her.

All according to plan.

Safety
04-14-2017, 10:49 PM
How was liberal hypocrisy exposed today?


Is it because Susan Rice invested in a pipeline that many liberals are against? This would be hypocrisy if she were an environmentalist. Cons probably think all libz are environmentalists, so I understand your spurious conclusion.

You're talking above their intelligence threshold.

Ransom
04-15-2017, 05:50 AM
Money in politics only a problem when it's an (R). I remember Obama's two campaigns were right at 1B dollar behemoths, money in politics was ok for him. Goldman Sachs, all the biggies donated to Obama and this last 2016 Hillary campaigns, even Bernie spoke out against it. But they're (D)'s, they're not corrupted by money in politics.

Starman
04-16-2017, 04:30 PM
You da man, ransom. The Democratic Party should be prosecuted as a criminal enterprise under the RICO Act.
Just a few of their filthy deeds came to the public's notice at the last election. Rest assured many more are out there, and I pray that they are discovered for the world to see.

Tahuyaman
04-16-2017, 05:24 PM
Money in politics only a problem when it's an (R). I remember Obama's two campaigns were right at 1B dollar behemoths, money in politics was ok for him. Goldman Sachs, all the biggies donated to Obama and this last 2016 Hillary campaigns, even Bernie spoke out against it. But they're (D)'s, they're not corrupted by money in politics.


The left is not opposed to money in politics. They are just opposed to that money going to people or organizations they disagree with.

Starman
04-25-2017, 07:22 AM
On this topic of filthy rich liberal hypocrites, Bill and Hillary's "charitable foundation" took in $184 million just in 2014, and donated 2.8% of that to charitable causes. Absolutely criminal. Thuggishly sickening.

Crepitus
04-25-2017, 07:30 AM
On this topic of filthy rich liberal hypocrites, Bill and Hillary's "charitable foundation" took in $184 million just in 2014, and donated 2.8% of that to charitable causes. Absolutely criminal. Thuggishly sickening.

The foundation does most of its own work rather than redonating to other causes.

resister
04-25-2017, 08:52 AM
The foundation does most of its own work rather than redonating to other causes.
How so?

Ransom
04-25-2017, 10:02 AM
The foundation does most of its own work rather than redonating to other causes.
:biglaugh:

Tahuyaman
04-25-2017, 11:30 AM
On this topic of filthy rich liberal hypocrites, Bill and Hillary's "charitable foundation" took in $184 million just in 2014, and donated 2.8% of that to charitable causes. Absolutely criminal. Thuggishly sickening.


Those days are over. They no longer have any access or influence to sell.

jimmyz
04-25-2017, 12:23 PM
I'm uncomfortable calling out Susan Rice like the Left called out people like the Koch brothers for having wealth just because they are my political opposite. The political class in America has always been made up of the more landed type of citizens. Noblesse oblige and all that. Politicians lining their pockets is a perk of the office. Distasteful but true.

resister
04-25-2017, 12:31 PM
The foundation does most of its own work rather than redonating to other causes.So...not gonna tell us how?

Crepitus
04-25-2017, 06:36 PM
How so?

They don't collect money to give to united way or whatever. They take the donated money and go build houses or pay for treatment or whatever. Watchdog organizations put the flow through to actual charity projects at 86%.

Link. http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/

Crepitus
04-25-2017, 07:04 PM
:biglaugh:

See post number 31

Crepitus
04-25-2017, 07:23 PM
So...not gonna tell us how?

Some of us work.

Starman
04-25-2017, 09:43 PM
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c5cc50e94a&view=fimg&th=15ba586e5ef3b83a&attid=0.17&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ9wL1XdveBHesj7EhtkQbmlsLdZlCN7RvW6OfR Jw-4yihIPS6ScF-SZdo-Y3LaV2kqnc8bDPAh5-CT7UQWN6q--RB7UhcMrsKVx_nP0NtDxoHrxJhtvwVKHI9M&sz=w1058-h738&ats=1493147290815&rm=15ba586e5ef3b83a&zw&atsh=1


which collected $184 million just in 2014, during which year that "charitable foundation"
paid out 2.8% to charities.