Rightwing zealots claim the violence is libs fault.

[AZ Jim]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIs2L2nUL-0

[resister]

Get back to us when an R goes and shoots up congress.

[AZ Jim]

Get back to us when an R goes and shoots up congress.Then when the Trump violence creates such a scenario what will your next ignorant reply be?

[resister]

Then when the Trump violence creates such a scenario what will your next ignorant reply be?If and but, your reply is the ignorant one. Watch the news wensday morning?
Are you praying for a republican equivalent?

How about condemn the liberal physco shooter?

Let me guess? Trump's fault?

[resister]

Regarding your thread title, Wednesday mornings violence was entirely the fault of one nutball liberal. Wonder if he was anti NRA?

[AZ Jim]

Regarding your thread title, Wednesday mornings violence was entirely the fault of one nutball liberal. Wonder if he was anti NRA?Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?

[resister]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?
Ok, lets play that game, no one can say what they want because a nut might just act on it? No more first?

[resister]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?So you just ignore when the left does it and act like it only comes from one side?

[Cletus]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?

Jim, the political violence in this country is coming almost exclusively from the Left. They have been able to get away with it only because the Right has not responded in kind.

I am just about at the point where I am ready to say "If violence is what you want, bring it". That would give us a reason to do the world a favor and rid it of them once and for all. The ball is in their court. What happens next is up to them. My advice to them though, is... Don't start a fight you can't win.

[midcan5]

When you live in a glass house....

http://www.thedailybeast.com/home-grown-right-wing-terrorism-the-hate-the-gop-refuses-to-see

https://www.juancole.com/2017/03/violence-populist-extremism.html

https://www.juancole.com/2015/06/terrorists-americans-extremists.html


'Home-Grown, Right-Wing Terrorism: The Hate the GOP Refuses to See'

'As the Las Vegas shootings show, right-wing extremism is real and on the rise. But for Republicans, better to focus on the Muslims.'

[DGUtley]

2014 isolated shooting and an article about Canada and Norway? Ok.

[hanger4]

Then when the Trump violence creates such a scenario what will your next ignorant reply be?

AZ Jim why aren't you motivated to violence because of Trumps words or lack of ??

[Common]

Oh My I farted, that goddamn Donald Trump...lol this is gone far beyond silly

[Peter1469]

The "news" won't tell you that the latest two "matters" were from Bernie bots. Oregon and Alexandria.

[AZ Jim]

@AZ Jim (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1901) why aren't you motivated to violence because of Trumps words or lack of ?? Think about it awhile.

[Crepitus]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?

You will never get these wack-jobs to admit that.

[Chris]

One tends to think that the left advocating violence against the right fires up the left to do that, and, of course, vice versa, but I said it yesterday in one of the threads on this topic, that there's also likely crossover, where the right's words fires up the left to act, and, of course, vice versa. Right now we see the left acting out, but the right could. Just as guns don't, political principles don't kill, people do.

[hanger4]

Think about it awhile.

Why AZ Jim ?? I asked a simple question.

Apparently you aren't motivated to violence by Trumps words, why is that ??

[Hoosier8]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCYCfx1UwAAszEt.jpg

[Peter1469]

The left is preaching hate these days.

[birddog]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?

You continue to be FOS. The entire TDS which is exacerbated by the MSM is perpetuating violence against conservative thinkers.

[decedent]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIs2L2nUL-0

I miss Obama. Trump is possibly the most divisive President since Jefferson Davis.

[birddog]

I miss Obama. Trump is possibly the most divisive President since Jefferson Davis.


Any of Trump's incendiary remarks are minor compared to what your libnut MSM puts out. Obama was clearly the most divisive president in my lifetime. Try dealing with facts for a chang. Surely you are not that ignorant.:rollseyes:

[resister]

Any of Trump's incendiary remarks are minor compared to what your libnut MSM puts out. Obama was clearly the most divisive president in my lifetime. Try dealing with facts for a chang. Surely you are not that ignorant.:rollseyes:The MSM spouts far more craziness in a day than Trump ever has!

[Crepitus]

The MSM spouts far more craziness in a day than Trump ever has!

Like what?

[decedent]

Any of Trump's incendiary remarks are minor compared to what your libnut MSM puts out. Obama was clearly the most divisive president in my lifetime. Try dealing with facts for a chang. Surely you are not that ignorant.:rollseyes:

Speaking of ignorance, can you show us some "incendiary remarks" that Obama made in his eight years as President?

[resister]

Like what?
How about Waters, Pelosi and Warren? And who can forget this1835918360 MSM, the left, all the same

[AeonPax]

`
This N&P forum is absolutely no different than the thousands of other similar forums; the far (zealot) right clashes with the far (zealot) left. Despite all the commotion being paid by mods, vips and whatever to a more civilized and structured environment, you still have over half the posts here ending up in partisan flames. Lies, generalizations and half-truths are the staple diet of the zealots as is confusing opinions for facts. This thread is an excellent example of it. Neither side has any use for those who can think independent of the conservative/liberal (see democratic/republican) hive minded group-think.

[Crepitus]

How about Waters, Pelosi and Warren? And who can forget this1835918360 MSM, the left, all the same

OK, what about waters, pelosi, and warren?

And one comedian. This may be news to you but comedians are not part of the media in the traditional sense.

You do realize you just posted a picture of 3 actual beheadings don't you? Guessing there is a rule against that.

[Chris]

`
This N&P forum is absolutely no different than the thousands of other similar forums; the far (zealot) right clashes with the far (zealot) left. Despite all the commotion being paid by mods, vips and whatever to a more civilized and structured environment, you still have over half the posts here ending up in partisan flames. Lies, generalizations and half-truths are the staple diet of the zealots as is confusing opinions for facts. This thread is an excellent example of it. Neither side has any use for those who can think independent of the conservative/liberal (see democratic/republican) hive minded group-think.



When a ship in sinking many people panic.

[birddog]

Speaking of ignorance, can you show us some "incendiary remarks" that Obama made in his eight years as President?

His speech at Ferguson for one, one example of many that any person with at least a room temperature IQ would see.

[decedent]

His speech at Ferguson for one, one example of many that any person with at least a room temperature IQ would see.

Obama's speech about Ferguson was incendiary? I'd like to know how. He called for peace and better relationship between law enforcement an communities, saying their are good people on both sides of the debate. What you see just doesn't exist.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2BBAfWucaE

[resister]

OK, what about waters, pelosi, and warren?

And one comedian. This may be news to you but comedians are not part of the media in the traditional sense.

You do realize you just posted a picture of 3 actual beheadings don't you? Guessing there is a rule against that.Nahh, fake heads. If you don't think Pelosi , Waters and Warren don't spout crazy crap, no link in the world would suffice

[gamewell45]

Get back to us when an R goes and shoots up congress.
Gabby Gifford was probably the last one. The guy who shot her was an Independent but political convictions were conservative.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner

[Mister D]

Gabby Gifford was probably the last one. The guy who shot her was an Independent but political convictions were conservative.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner

Your citation suggests otherwise.

[gamewell45]

Your citation suggests otherwise.

If you go to the section that says "views on politics" that should clarify things.

[Crepitus]

Nahh, fake heads. If you don't think Pelosi , Waters and Warren don't spout crazy crap, no link in the world would suffice

Again, not part of the "media".

[Mister D]

If you go to the section that says "views on politics" that should clarify things.
It does exactly the opposite.

[resister]

Again, not part of the "media".
The left and the media are best chums.

[resister]

It does exactly the opposite.
As well as debunking many other claims made by the left about him.

[Private Pickle]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIs2L2nUL-0

Berkley anyone?

[gamewell45]

It does exactly the opposite.
It's quite possible that I mis-read the section; I'll go back and read it again. If I'm wrong, then my apologies.

[gamewell45]

I went back and re-read the section and I believe it does imply that Jared Lee Loughner had changed his political viewpoint to "conservative and anti-government.

"Records show that Loughner was registered as an Independent (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_(voter)) and voted in 2006 and 2008, but not in 2010.[39] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-Cillizza2011-01-11-39)[40] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-CNN_Political_Unit2011-01-10-40)
Loughner's high-school friend Zach Osler said, "He did not watch TV; he disliked the news; he didn't listen to political radio; he didn't take sides; he wasn't on the Left (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_politics); he wasn't on the Right (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics)."[18] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-Banfield2011-01-12-18) A former classmate, Caitie Parker, who attended high school and college with Loughner, described his political views prior to 2007, prior to his personality transformation, as "left wing, quite liberal,"[41] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-41) "radical."[42] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-42) The tone of Loughner's online writings and videos from immediately before the attack were described by The Guardian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian) as "almost exclusively conservative and anti-government, with echoes of the populist campaigning of the Tea Party movement".[43] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-43)"

--taken from wikipedia


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#Views_on_politics

That's how I came to my conclusion on my answer originally.

[Mister D]

I went back and re-read the section and I believe it does imply that Jared Lee Loughner had changed his political viewpoint to "conservative and anti-government.

"Records show that Loughner was registered as an Independent (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_(voter)) and voted in 2006 and 2008, but not in 2010.[39] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-Cillizza2011-01-11-39)[40] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-CNN_Political_Unit2011-01-10-40)
Loughner's high-school friend Zach Osler said, "He did not watch TV; he disliked the news; he didn't listen to political radio; he didn't take sides; he wasn't on the Left (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_politics); he wasn't on the Right (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics)."[18] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-Banfield2011-01-12-18) A former classmate, Caitie Parker, who attended high school and college with Loughner, described his political views prior to 2007, prior to his personality transformation, as "left wing, quite liberal,"[41] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-41) "radical."[42] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-42) The tone of Loughner's online writings and videos from immediately before the attack were described by The Guardian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian) as "almost exclusively conservative and anti-government, with echoes of the populist campaigning of the Tea Party movement".[43] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#cite_note-43)"

--taken from wikipedia


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#Views_on_politics

That's how I came to my conclusion on my answer originally.
The entire article is a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions. That should surprise no one. Trying to pin a political label on a paranoid schizophrenic is an exercise in futility.

[Mister D]

It's also pretty fucking retarded.

[Tahuyaman]

Do you not track the logic that if a candidate for the highest office in our country talks, condones and encourages violence frequently he is going to bring out violence in many others of all political allegiances and of various mental condition?


The shapers of young minds on college campuses are telling students that all Republicans should be lined up and shot.


Elected Democrats are telling their constituents that Republucans want to starve and kill their children. Deny everyone medical care. Throw elderly people out on the streets to die. Poison the air, water and food supply and destroy the earth. They post messages on social media telling people to "hunt down Republicans".


Will any liberal here condemn that type of rhetoric?

[Hoosier8]

If a Democrat is shot, the shooter's politics are the problem.

If a Republican is shot, the victim's politics are the problem.

Do they realize this is akin to blaming a woman for being raped if she wears a short skirt?

[AZ Jim]

The shapers of young minds on college campuses are telling students that all Republicans should be lined up and shot.


Elected Democrats are telling their constituents that Republucans want to starve and kill their children. Deny everyone medical care. Throw elderly people out on the streets to die. Poison the air, water and food supply and destroy the earth. They post messages on social media telling people to "hunt down Republicans".


Will any liberal here condemn that type of rhetoric? Post a convincing link showing colleges teaching such rot or be known as a liar.

[Tahuyaman]

Post a convincing link showing colleges teaching such rot or be known as a liar.

Do you have selective memory lapses?


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/14/remember-professor-who-said-republicans-should-be-executed.html



https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/05/11/furor-over-texas-am-philosophers-comments-violence-against-white-people

[AZ Jim]

Do you have selective memory lapses?


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/14/remember-professor-who-said-republicans-should-be-executed.html



https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/05/11/furor-over-texas-am-philosophers-comments-violence-against-white-peopleNo. 1 FOX....'Nuff said. No.2 Curry was talking about self defense and he was referring to whites (not republicans as you misstated).

[Crepitus]

The left and the media are best chums.

Since you can't point out and cases of any media saying things as "crazy as trump" and are now just dodging I'm gonna assume you got nothing.

[Tahuyaman]

No. 1 FOX....'Nuff said. No.2 Curry was talking about self defense and he was referring to whites (not republicans as you misstated).

It's OK for a college professor to advocate killing whites as long as he's not singling whites of one particular political leaning? And he wasn't referring to self defense.

You are such a hack, you can't even face the facts pertaining to the extreme hyperbole from the hard left.

You blame Republicans, conservatives or Trump for liberals telling people that the goal of their political opposition is for everyone to die and then destroy the earth.


This is why the situation is going to get worse. People like you refuse to moderate or tame the rhetoric. Their goal is to roil up fear and anger. Then when that fear and anger manifests itself into violence, you point the finger of blame at the victims of the violence. They caused that impressionable person to lash out.

[jet57]

Then when the Trump violence creates such a scenario what will your next ignorant reply be?

I think that trumps just the icing on the poison cake that the radical right has been trying to feed us for a generation now. People get tire of abuse and begin to react; it's been a long time comin now.

[resister]

Since you can't point out and cases of any media saying things as "crazy as trump" and are now just dodging I'm gonna assume you got nothing.
You got a lot of nerve to ask me for a link, you agreed we would compare list yesterday, I got the link, then I asked you for yours twice, (the horror) was insulted by you and jumped on by your little wingmen and accused of harassment and insulted AND to top it off, you still did not give me a link.

So, you got ZERO business asking that of me.

You basically proved to me, debating with you is a big waste of time. So, there is that.

[Hoosier8]

I think that trumps just the icing on the poison cake that the radical right has been trying to feed us for a generation now. People get tire of abuse and begin to react; it's been a long time comin now.

Great example of radical left wing rhetoric. Republicans want to kill you so left wing violence is appropriate.

[resister]

Great example of radical left wing rhetoric. Republicans want to kill you so left wing violence is appropriate.
But he is not left! lol

[Hoosier8]

But he is not left! lol

LOL, yeah, I saw that on his intro. Except for his partisanship, he isn't partisan.

[Tahuyaman]

I think that trumps just the icing on the poison cake that the radical right has been trying to feed us for a generation now. People get tire of abuse and begin to react; it's been a long time comin now.


I'm not sure what point you are trying to make there. Trump certainly isn't on the hard right. And I don't know what this "poison cake" is that you are referring to.

[Tahuyaman]

But he is not left! lol


He also said that he stands for whatever is real. He's clearly a left leaning type, which is fine if one can admit it, and I'm trying to figure out what is real about his "poison cake" in his opening comment here.

[decedent]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIs2L2nUL-0

Wow. It's easy to forget what a thug Trump is. Trump is no Obama.


The funny thing is, he's all talk. Talking about wanting to assault people as if he can actually fight.

[Hoosier8]

Wow. It's easy to forget what a thug Trump is. Trump is no Obama.


The funny thing is, he's all talk. Talking about wanting to assault people as if he can actually fight.

Yep, he doesn't wear mom jeans.

[Crepitus]

You got a lot of nerve to ask me for a link, you agreed we would compare list yesterday, I got the link, then I asked you for yours twice, (the horror) was insulted by you and jumped on by your little wingmen and accused of harassment and insulted AND to top it off, you still did not give me a link.

So, you got ZERO business asking that of me.

You basically proved to me, debating with you is a big waste of time. So, there is that.

Dude, you are hallucinating or some shit. That isn't the way that happened at all.

[jet57]

Great example of radical left wing rhetoric. Republicans want to kill you so left wing violence is appropriate.
The the fact ma'am.

Yeah, I guess our founders were just another example of radical left-wing rhetoric inaction too.

[Hoosier8]

The the fact ma'am.

Yeah, I guess our founders were just another example of radical left-wing rhetoric inaction too.

You mistake actual violence with retarded left wing fantasies.

[jet57]

I'm not sure what point you are trying to make there. Trump certainly isn't on the hard right. And I don't know what this "poison cake" is that you are referring to.

Trump has decided to represent the hard right policies. This stuff isn't so much about Trump proper, it's a continuation of things like 'occupy'. The more the hard right denies and pushes the agenda the more of this stuff we're going to see. Notice that each outburst gets a bit bigger and harder to control. Crazy people, like the guy at the baseball field will just become more active as well. It's time for it.

[resister]

Dude, you are hallucinating or some shit. That isn't the way that happened at all.Now just lie, your usual MO, want me to repost it so you can eat your words.

Remember, don't count on me not knowing forum functions well enough to discredit your lies any more.

So for the record are saying you did not ask to compare list about there being more laws against murder than gun laws?

Did you not say "lets compare list"?

Now you insult me and say I am hallucinating? Like I said, debating you is a waste of time.

Lying is your forte.

Go ahead and call me the liar.

[resister]

Crazy people, like the guy at the baseball field will just become more active as well. It's time for it. Right here people, here is the hate, but he is not "left"18366

[Tahuyaman]

Trump has decided to represent the hard right policies. This stuff isn't so much about Trump proper, it's a continuation of things like 'occupy'. The more the hard right denies and pushes the agenda the more of this stuff we're going to see. Notice that each outburst gets a bit bigger and harder to control. Crazy people, like the guy at the baseball field will just become more active as well. It's time for it.


Trump is is not a fan of globalism. Certainly that is something the hard right approves of, but he is not a particularly right wing type.

In your introduction, you claimed to be a realist and centrist. Neither appears to be the case so far.

[Tahuyaman]

Right here people, here is the hate, but he is not "left"18366

Yep, just another hateful leftist who can't honestly present his views.

[Crepitus]

Now just lie, your usual MO, want me to repost it so you can eat your words.

Remember, don't count on me not knowing forum functions well enough to discredit your lies any more.

So for the record are saying you did not ask to compare list about there being more laws against murder than gun laws?

Did you not say "lets compare list"?

Now you insult me and say I am hallucinating? Like I said, debating you is a waste of time.

Lying is your forte.

Go ahead and call me the liar.

Go ahead and repost it, it didn't happen that way.

[resister]

Go ahead and repost it, it didn't happen that way.
So you did not say, there are more laws against murder than guns?

[resister]

So you did not say, there are more laws against murder than guns?
http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/84682-Driver-with-Trump-Sticker-shot-at-several-times?p=2059692#post2059692

[del]

So you did not say, there are more laws against murder than guns?


http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/84682-Driver-with-Trump-Sticker-shot-at-several-times?p=2059692#post2059692

:rofl:

what part of *probably* is too much for you to process?

[Mister D]

Yeah, so it was *probably* a really stupid comment. Feel better, Crepitus? lol

[Crepitus]

Yeah, so it was *probably* a really stupid comment. Feel better, Crepitus? lol

Turns out it's a pretty close race. He went off when I didn't respond fast enough so we never really got through with the discussion.

[resister]

Turns out it's a pretty close race. He went off when I didn't respond fast enough so we never really got through with the discussion.
I asked you twice, you came back and insulted me (remember it was your idea)

Then your wing men Swooped in to insult mode.

You still have not made good on your end of the deal, but yet ask me to prove something today.

Then when I bust you out, you insult again .

I'm done going in circles with you, never ask me for a link until you hold good on your part of the deal.

[resister]

:rofl:

what part of *probably* is too much for you to process?
http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/84682-Driver-with-Trump-Sticker-shot-at-several-times?p=2059712#post2059712

If you want to play wingman #3 keep up.

[Crepitus]

I asked you twice, you came back and insulted me (remember it was your idea)

Then your wing men Swooped in to insult mode.

You still have not made good on your end of the deal, but yet ask me to prove something today.

Then when I bust you out, you insult again .

I'm done going in circles with you, never ask me for a link until you hold good on your part of the deal.

Where did I insult you?

And I don't have any "wing men".

Go back and read the thread. I posted a link debunking your "20000 gun laws" nonsense.

[resister]

Where did I insult you?


Go back and read the thread. I posted a link debunking your "20000 gun laws" nonsense.
http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/84682-Driver-with-Trump-Sticker-shot-at-several-times?p=2059774#post2059774 now you go back and re-read the thread, I flat out stated their is some dispute on that claim.

Then you claimed you debunked my link THE ATF REGULATIONS LOL.

BTW, you still owe me a link that their are more laws against murder than guns.

Until you post one, never ask me for a link.

[Crepitus]

http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/84682-Driver-with-Trump-Sticker-shot-at-several-times?p=2059774#post2059774 now you go back and re-read the thread, I flat out stated their is some dispute on that claim.

Then you claimed you debunked my link THE ATF REGULATIONS LOL.

BTW, you still owe me a link that their are more laws against murder than guns.

Until you post one, never ask me for a link.

There in no comprehensive link of every states murder laws. I listed kansas's and stated I assumed other states were similar.

[Crepitus]

http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/84682-Driver-with-Trump-Sticker-shot-at-several-times?p=2059774#post2059774 now you go back and re-read the thread, I flat out stated their is some dispute on that claim.

Then you claimed you debunked my link THE ATF REGULATIONS LOL.

BTW, you still owe me a link that their are more laws against murder than guns.

Until you post one, never ask me for a link.

Btw, I didn't even look at you list of ATF regulations because they were not germane to the discussion.

[Dr. Who]

It's OK for a college professor to advocate killing whites as long as he's not singling whites of one particular political leaning? And he wasn't referring to self defense.

You are such a hack, you can't even face the facts pertaining to the extreme hyperbole from the hard left.

You blame Republicans, conservatives or Trump for liberals telling people that the goal of their political opposition is for everyone to die and then destroy the earth.


This is why the situation is going to get worse. People like you refuse to moderate or tame the rhetoric. Their goal is to roil up fear and anger. Then when that fear and anger manifests itself into violence, you point the finger of blame at the victims of the violence. They caused that impressionable person to lash out.
If any professor is advocating that students commit murder, that person should not only be dimissed from the educational institution but should also face conspiracy to commit murder charges. I think that's a pretty non-partisan point of view, don't you?

[Tahuyaman]

If any professor is advocating that students commit murder, that person should not only be dimissed from the educational institution but should also face conspiracy to commit murder charges. I think that's a pretty non-partisan point of view, don't you?


Right, but when was the last time you saw a conservative college professor say that all Democrats should be lined up and shot? Have you ever seen a conservative senator or congressman go to the podium and tell everyone that the goal of the Democrats is to destroy the earth and kill the elderly and starve children?

[resister]

Btw, I didn't even look at you list of ATF regulations because they were not germane to the discussion.They are gun laws, gotta love when someone asks for a link, says they will reciprocate, ignores link, does not post own link.

Then has gall to ask for link next day....lol

[Dr. Who]

Right, but when was the last time you saw a conservative college professor say that all Democrats should be lined up and shot? Have you ever seen a conservative senator or congressman go to the podium and tell everyone that the goal of the Democrats is to destroy the earth and kill the elderly and starve children?

Conservatives are the minority in teaching. That's just a reflection of the personality types who go into the teaching profession.

I haven't read everything that every politician has emoted at a podium, so I really don't know, but I do know that no party has cornered the market on hyperbole.

[Tahuyaman]

Right, but when was the last time you saw a conservative college professor say that all Democrats should be lined up and shot? Have you ever seen a conservative senator or congressman go to the podium and tell everyone that the goal of the Democrats is to destroy the earth and kill the elderly and starve children?


Conservatives are the minority in teaching. That's just a reflection of the personality types who go into the teaching profession.

I haven't read everything that every politician has emoted at a podium, so I really don't know, but I do know that no party has cornered the market on hyperbole.


You really don't want to address my question, huh?


If a Republican or conservative politician had ever made a statement like that, you would have heard about it on every news network ten times a day for at least a week and then reminded about it every time he made a public comment in the future.

[Dr. Who]

You really don't want to address my question, huh?


If a Republican or conservative politician had ever made a statement like that, you would have heard about it on every news network ten times a day for at least a week and then reminded about it every time he made a public comment in the future.

Like I said, I don't know the specifics, but here's a little factoid. Of the 14 members of Congress assasinated or wounded in office, 10 were Democrats and 4 were Republicans. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Congress_members_killed_or_w ounded_in_office

[Crepitus]

They are gun laws, gotta love when someone asks for a link, says they will reciprocate, ignores link, does not post own link.

Then has gall to ask for link next day....lol

Not the gun laws we were referring to. Those deal of with import, export, manufacturing, design, sales, and so on. Very little dealing with individual ownership which is what our conversation was about.

You about ready to stop embarrassing yourself and get this thread back on track?

[jet57]

Right here people, here is the hate, but he is not "left"18366

(chuckle)

I started a thread over at debatepoltics asking if people thought that Trump might be the anichrist, and I got gigged for making a religious thread political; which was stupid, because there is supposed to be an antichrist; there have been articles written on the him as such. The avatar is a reminder to the idiot mods over there.

Here's proof of the question:

http://www.redstate.com/diary/clconnett/2016/05/16/yes-dear-christian-antichrist/

So, now that you have introduced yourself as a "jump to conclusions hater who doesn't know what he's talking about"...

Pick a subject and we can debate.

[resister]

Not the gun laws we were referring to. Those deal of with import, export, manufacturing, design, sales, and so on. Very little dealing with individual ownership which is what our conversation was about.


You admitted you did bother to read my link, it is a comprehensive guide on all federal gun laws, from domestic to foreign.

Much better than the "no link" you never provided after asking me to and saying you would.

Again, don't ever ask me for a link until you provide me a link proving that there are more laws against murder than, gun laws. You said gun laws, want to go back and say just "some" gun laws?

You can never say you are wrong, can you?

[resister]

(chuckle)

I started a thread over at debatepoltics asking if people thought that Trump might be the anichrist, and I got gigged for making a religious thread political; which was stupid, because there is supposed to be an antichrist; there have been articles written on the him as such. The avatar is a reminder to the idiot mods over there.

Here's proof of the question:

http://www.redstate.com/diary/clconnett/2016/05/16/yes-dear-christian-antichrist/

So, now that you have introduced yourself as a "jump to conclusions hater who doesn't know what he's talking about"...

Pick a subject and we can debate.
Don't you know, every president since forever when is the anti Christ. More referring to you saying "it is time for it" concerning the recent Scalise shooting.

[Crepitus]

You admitted you did bother to read my link, it is a comprehensive guide on all federal gun laws, from domestic to foreign.

Much better than the "no link" you never provided after asking me to and saying you would.

Again, don't ever ask me for a link until you provide me a link proving that there are more laws against murder than, gun laws. You said gun laws, want to go back and say just "some" gun laws?

You can never say you are wrong, can you?

I went back and read it .

I am not wrong.

You are moving the goal posts. No worries though, im used to it. It is a conservative trait.

I will ask you for a link any time I choose, your childish pouting and desires have no effect on my actions.

[resister]

(chuckle)

I started a thread over at debatepoltics asking if people thought that Trump might be the anichrist, and I got gigged for making a religious thread political; which was stupid, because there is supposed to be an antichrist; there have been articles written on the him as such. The avatar is a reminder to the idiot mods over there.

Here's proof of the question:

http://www.redstate.com/diary/clconnett/2016/05/16/yes-dear-christian-antichrist/

So, now that you have introduced yourself as a "jump to conclusions hater who doesn't know what he's talking about"...

Pick a subject and we can debate.
How about you referring to the recent shooting and stating "It is time for it" ? Sounds like a good "Debate topic",right?

[jet57]

Trump is is not a fan of globalism. Certainly that is something the hard right approves of, but he is not a particularly right wing type.

In your introduction, you claimed to be a realist and centrist. Neither appears to be the case so far.

No, you're right; he isn't particularly right-wing, however is certainly catering to that cause and do everything he can to ingratiate himself to that end. That has shown itself, from the beginning to be a big problem for him as the bombastic MO of the far right fits his personality mold and that has brought him no end of disrespect and trouble. The man clearly has no respect for the office he holds, or for people in general in my view and as a result he is unashamedly throwing banana peels into his own path.

I've never like the guy personally, but once he got elected and with the right-wing in control I thought Id have an open mind and see what they could do, but so far they've only taken a bad situation and made it worse. The country has no leadership whatsoever.

As for my politics, I go with what's real. For the record the Democrats have been eating from the weak kneed stupid pill box of cereal since Johnson left office.

[resister]

I went back and read it .

I am not wrong.



You stated there are more laws against murder than guns, you gave zero links at all, just deflections and insults and ignored the ATF REGULATIONS (laws)

Can I expect to see you ever back your claim with a link?

Evidently not, we are this far in and you show no sign of doing so, or *gasp* saying, "crepitus made a wrong claim"

[resister]

I will ask you for a link any time I choose, your childish pouting and desires have no effect on my actions.You can continue to childishly insult me and ask for links all you want, until you show me a link that there are more laws against murder than there are guns, I will ignore you as the insulting hypocrite you are.

I said Good Day.

[Crepitus]

You stated there are more laws against murder than guns, you gave zero links at all, just deflections and insults and ignored the ATF REGULATIONS (laws)

Can I expect to see you ever back your claim with a link?

Evidently not, we are this far in and you show no sign of doing so, or *gasp* saying, "crepitus made a wrong claim"

Jesus this is getting old


You need to get over this and move on. I'm right, you're wrong. You'd think you would be getting used to it by now.

[Crepitus]

You can continue to childishly insult me and ask for links all you want, until you show me a link that there are more laws against murder than there are guns, I will ignore you as the insulting hypocrite you are.

I said Good Day.

Once again, point out the insults.

[Tahuyaman]

You stated there are more laws against murder than guns, you gave zero links at all, just deflections and insults and ignored the ATF REGULATIONS (laws)

Can I expect to see you ever back your claim with a link?

Evidently not, we are this far in and you show no sign of doing so, or *gasp* saying, "crepitus made a wrong claim"


How many laws can you have against murder? Murder is a criminal act. It's a criminal act whether it's committed by using a hammer or a gun.

I'm not sure what he means by that that?

[resister]

How many laws can you have against murder? Murder is a criminal act. It's a criminal act whether it's committed by using a hammer or a gun.

I'm not sure what he means by that that?
He never did provide a link and claims he is right. I provided the ATF firearms guide....:rollseyes:

Done with him on. Debating someone like that is pointless.

[AZ Jim]

He never did provide a link and claims he is right. I provided the ATF firearms guide....:rollseyes:

Done with him on. Debating someone like that is pointless.Translation: "Damn it he kicked my ass again!!"

[birddog]

He never did provide a link and claims he is right. I provided the ATF firearms guide....:rollseyes:

Done with him on. Debating someone like that is pointless.

Most of the libs around here are dumber than owl poop! Sad but true.:grin:

[AZ Jim]

Most of the libs around here are dumber than owl poop! Sad but true.:grin:Link to your IQ score?

[resister]

Translation: "Damn it he kicked my ass again!!"
Try reading, when you say "lets compare links" then don't bother to provide one and declare yourself the "winner"

Your logic is as shallow as his....:rollseyes:

[Cletus]

Link to your IQ score?

If we did that, I doubt the forum's Leftists would fare very well.

[birddog]

Link to your IQ score?

If you tell me yours first, I swear to be honest to reply with mine.

[Tahuyaman]

Then when the Trump violence creates such a scenario what will your next ignorant reply be?


This is absolute proof that with the liberals, one can always find a way to hold other's responsible for the intolerable acts of their kind.

[Common Sense]

This is absolute proof that with the liberals, one can always find a way to hold other's responsible for the intolerable acts of their kind.

Don't forget to remind me to blame you for the actions of the KKK...

[Tahuyaman]

Don't forget to remind me to blame you for the actions of the KKK...

The KKK originated as an arm of the Democrat party.

[Common Sense]

The KKK originated as an arm of the Democrat party.
...and Lincoln was a Republican. Things change.

(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)

[Tahuyaman]

Try reading, when you say "lets compare links" then don't bother to provide one and declare yourself the "winner"

Your logic is as shallow as his....:rollseyes:

He was talking about sausage.

[resister]

(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)
Where did you hear that at?

[Tahuyaman]

...and Lincoln was a Republican. Things change.

(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)


Thats a nice revision of history.

They were created to oppose Republican reconstruction efforts.

[resister]

Thats a nice revision of history.

They were created to oppose Republican reconstruction efforts.
Alternative history :wink:

[Tahuyaman]

Where did you hear that at?


Public education would be my guess.

[Common Sense]

Thats a nice revision of history.
Yours is a fiction. Mine is reality.

Some members of the early KKK were indeed Democrats, but it was never an arm of the Democrat party.

But again, things change.

[Common Sense]

Where did you hear that at?

In every historical account of their creation.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/ku-klux-klan

http://www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/ku-klux-klan-founded

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ku-Klux-Klan

http://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan

[Common Sense]

It's amazing how many people are ignorant of their own history.

[resister]

Yours is a fiction. Mine is reality.

Some members of the early KKK were indeed Democrats, but it was never an arm of the Democrat party.

But again, things change.
A link could clear things up nicely, just saying.

[resister]

In every historical account of their creation.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/ku-klux-klan

http://www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/ku-klux-klan-founded

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ku-Klux-Klan

http://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan
What about this one
http://russp.us/racism.htm

[del]

In every historical account of their creation.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/ku-klux-klan

http://www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/ku-klux-klan-founded

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ku-Klux-Klan

http://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan


A link could clear things up nicely, just saying.


derp

[Common Sense]

What about this one
http://russp.us/racism.htm

LOL...yeah, that seems reputable. Sorry if I don't give much credit to some dude and his shitty looking blog.

[del]

What about this one
http://russp.us/racism.htm


:rofl:

[resister]

LOL...yeah, that seems reputable. Sorry if I don't give much credit to some dude and his shitty looking blog.


OK, I can do this all dayhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts

[resister]

derp
Run along wingman, run along and play.

[del]

OK, I can do this all dayhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts

you can do it forever and it will still be bullshit.

see what prison planet has on it and get back to me.

[del]

Run along wingman, run along and play.

nah, i've always been a sucker for a freak show

carry on

[Tahuyaman]

Yours is a fiction. Mine is reality.

Some members of the early KKK were indeed Democrats, but it was never an arm of the Democrat party.

But again, things change.


Are you willing to admit that your version of how or why the KKK was created was wrong?

[Tahuyaman]

...and Lincoln was a Republican. Things change.

(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)


This is blatantly false. I think you now know that.

[Tahuyaman]

Alternative history :wink:

Liberals can't help themselves. That's why they only make problems worse. They refuse to accept responsibility and learn from their failures.

[Tahuyaman]

Yours is a fiction. Mine is reality.

Some members of the early KKK were indeed Democrats, but it was never an arm of the Democrat party.

But again, things change.


First you said they were Republicans. Now you admit that they were Democrats. What's the next error you will admit?

[Common Sense]

OK, I can do this all dayhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts

LOL...you can throw more partisan garbage crap websites all you wish. Your posting of "Irish Mike's" blog rant is very compelling though.

[Common Sense]

First you said they were Republicans. Now you admit that they were Democrats. What's the next error you will admit?
I didn't say they were Republicans. I said (or implied) they "are" right wing.

Maybe you should read posts before you comment.

[Common Sense]

This is blatantly false. I think you now know that.

The KKK wasn't started by former Confederate soldiers? Seriously? Are you shitting me or do you actually believe that?

wow...

[Common Sense]

Are you willing to admit that your version of how or why the KKK was created was wrong?

no.

[Tahuyaman]

no.


I knew you couldn't do that.

I'm still laughing about your original contension that the KKK was formed by Republicans opposing Republican reconstruction policies.


While you're at it it, why don't you tell me how the civil rights act was only passed because of Democratic support?


The foundation of the Democrat party is racism. This is an undeniable fact.

[resister]

Here is another one, while searching I also looked at politifact, even they admit the KKK targeted Republicans

http://wnd.com/2007/10/44171

[hanger4]

...and Lincoln was a Republican. Things change.

(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)

"(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)"

Seriously Common Sense ??

The four links you posted even refute that bazaar statement.

[Safety]

The KKK wasn't started by former Confederate soldiers? Seriously? Are you shitting me or do you actually believe that?

wow...

It was started by democrats, but the same democrats that oppose muslims, gay marriage, police brutality, jews, hispanics, and interracial marriage....oh wait.

No, that equation does not equal zero, so there must be another variable in place that explains it....maybe it was the southern conservatives that didn't have the party lines that are in place today that started the KKK. For the slow ones that try to act smart, it was called ideology not party at that time.

[resister]

It was started by democrats, but the same democrats that oppose muslims, gay marriage, police brutality, jews, hispanics, and interracial marriage....oh wait.

No, that equation does not equal zero, so there must be another variable in place that explains it....maybe it was the southern conservatives that didn't have the party lines that are in place today that started the KKK. For the slow ones that try to act smart, it was called ideology not party at that time.
lawlz:f_whistle:

[Safety]

lawlz:f_whistle:

Exhibit A of someone living in the wrong era.

Lulz

[Tahuyaman]

The KKK wasn't started by former Confederate soldiers? Seriously? Are you $#@!ting me or do you actually believe that?

wow...

It was created by Democrats opposing Republican policies. Don't try to swerve away from your comments.

[resister]

It was created by Democrats opposing Republican policies. Don't try to swerve away from your comments.Oh, he gone !:f_run: His own links proved him Wrong! lol

[Tahuyaman]

Oh, he gone !:f_run: His own links proved him Wrong! lol

Gee. Am I supposed to be surprised?

[Cletus]

I didn't say they were Republicans. I said (or implied) they "are" right wing.

"(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)"

Your words.

[Tahuyaman]

I didn't say they were Republicans....


Yes you did. You know you did. Don't try to back away from that now.

[Common Sense]

Yes you did. You know you did. Don't try to back away from that now.
Show me where I said that.

[Common Sense]

"(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)"

Seriously @Common Sense (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1085) ??

The four links you posted even refute that bazaar statement.

Really?

"Origins and Initial GrowthEx-Confederate soldiers established the Ku Klux Klan in Pulaski, Tennessee, in 1866. They developed the first two words of the group's name from the Greek word kuklos, meaning "group or band," and took the third as a variant of the word clan. Starting as a largely recreational group, the Klan soon turned to intimidating newly freed African Americans. Riding at night, the Klan terrorized and sometimes murdered those it opposed. Members adopted a hooded white costume—a guise intended to represent the ghosts of the Confederate dead—to avoid identification and to frighten victims during nighttime raids."


or...

"The Klan began in Tennessee, in the small town of Pulaski, near Memphis. It was founded by Confederate army veterans at a drinking club there and the strange but memorable name was a combination of ‘clan’ and the Greek word kuklos, meaning ‘circle’ or, in this case, social club. Dressed up in scary costumes with hoods and masks, members rode about at night threatening and frightening blacks. They demanded that blacks either vote Democrat or not vote at all. They met defiance with beatings, whippings and sometimes murder. They burned blacks’ houses down and drove black farmers off their land and they extended their hostilities to southern whites who opposed them and the so-called ‘carpetbaggers’, white infiltrators from the North. "

[Safety]

Really?

"Origins and Initial GrowthEx-Confederate soldiers established the Ku Klux Klan in Pulaski, Tennessee, in 1866. They developed the first two words of the group's name from the Greek word kuklos, meaning "group or band," and took the third as a variant of the word clan. Starting as a largely recreational group, the Klan soon turned to intimidating newly freed African Americans. Riding at night, the Klan terrorized and sometimes murdered those it opposed. Members adopted a hooded white costume—a guise intended to represent the ghosts of the Confederate dead—to avoid identification and to frighten victims during nighttime raids."


or...

"The Klan began in Tennessee, in the small town of Pulaski, near Memphis. It was founded by Confederate army veterans at a drinking club there and the strange but memorable name was a combination of ‘clan’ and the Greek word kuklos, meaning ‘circle’ or, in this case, social club. Dressed up in scary costumes with hoods and masks, members rode about at night threatening and frightening blacks. They demanded that blacks either vote Democrat or not vote at all. They met defiance with beatings, whippings and sometimes murder. They burned blacks’ houses down and drove black farmers off their land and they extended their hostilities to southern whites who opposed them and the so-called ‘carpetbaggers’, white infiltrators from the North. "






Shame on you, you said republicans, so you must be flogged. Even though there is little to no difference in what the ideologies of the south and conservatives to the republicans today.

[hanger4]

Really?

"Origins and Initial GrowthEx-Confederate soldiers established the Ku Klux Klan in Pulaski, Tennessee, in 1866. They developed the first two words of the group's name from the Greek word kuklos, meaning "group or band," and took the third as a variant of the word clan. Starting as a largely recreational group, the Klan soon turned to intimidating newly freed African Americans. Riding at night, the Klan terrorized and sometimes murdered those it opposed. Members adopted a hooded white costume—a guise intended to represent the ghosts of the Confederate dead—to avoid identification and to frighten victims during nighttime raids."


or...

"The Klan began in Tennessee, in the small town of Pulaski, near Memphis. It was founded by Confederate army veterans at a drinking club there and the strange but memorable name was a combination of ‘clan’ and the Greek word kuklos, meaning ‘circle’ or, in this case, social club. Dressed up in scary costumes with hoods and masks, members rode about at night threatening and frightening blacks. They demanded that blacks either vote Democrat or not vote at all. They met defiance with beatings, whippings and sometimes murder. They burned blacks’ houses down and drove black farmers off their land and they extended their hostilities to southern whites who opposed them and the so-called ‘carpetbaggers’, white infiltrators from the North. "






Really !! "Confederate Republicans" starting the kkk is nowhere mentioned CS.

[resister]

Really !! "Confederate Republicans" starting the kkk is nowhere mentioned CS.
Deny, deflect, then insult.....not in any particular order.

[resister]

Show me where I said that.
Post # 110.

I would deny it too.

If it was possible.....lol

[Common Sense]

"(actually the KKK started as a group of Confederate Republicans as a reaction to federal progressive Restruction policies)"

Your words.
I honestly didn't mean to write Republicans and I was shocked to see that I did. My mistake. I honestly just meant to write confederate veterans.

Belive me or not. I didn't mean to write Republican.

[resister]

I honestly didn't mean to write Republicans and I was shocked to see that I did. My mistake. I honestly just meant to write confederate veterans.

Belive me or not. I didn't mean to write Republican.
lol

[resister]

lol
Then goes on to argue that the democrats did not start the Klan, super LOL

[Common Sense]

Post # 110.

I would deny it too.

If it was possible.....lol

Why would I argue so adamantly that I didn't say it if I had meant to say it? I mistakenly wrote it for whatever reason. I honestly didn't mean to. It doesn't make any sense either as the confederates weren't Republicans.
For whatever reason I wrote it. I didn't mean to. I apologize.

[Common Sense]

Then goes on to argue that the democrats did not start the Klan, super LOL
The Dems didn't start the KKK. Confederate veterans did.

[resister]

The Dems didn't start the KKK. Confederate veterans did.

So what party did they belong too?

[resister]

Why would I argue so adamantly that I didn't say it if I had meant to say it? I mistakenly wrote it for whatever reason. I honestly didn't mean to. It doesn't make any sense either as the confederates weren't Republicans.
For whatever reason I wrote it. I didn't mean to. I apologize.
I give you the benefit of the doubt, "republican" and "veteran" are easy to mistype!

[Common Sense]

I give you the benefit of the doubt, "republican" and "veteran" are easy to mistype!
I don't care if people belive me. It would make no sense for me to call them Reps. These are the people who fought Lincoln's army. It's no wonder people called me out on it. Frankly I had no idea what they were going on about until I looked at my post.

[Safety]

So what party did they belong too?

This should shut up any further questions about the KKK and what party they represented.

https://curricublog.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/1964_cr_n-s.gif?w=587&h=827

[Common Sense]

So what party did they belong too?
What part does the KKK belong to today?

[del]

This should shut up any further questions about the KKK and what party they represented.

https://curricublog.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/1964_cr_n-s.gif?w=587&h=827


i admire your optimism

[resister]

What part does the KKK belong to today?
Good deflection, can you answer the question, WHAT PARTY FOUNDED THE KLAN?

At this point in the thread, it is easy to see why you would answer a question with a question.

[Safety]

i admire your optimism

Well, it wasn't released by FOX, and Alex Jones didn't bless it, so I share your skepticism.

[del]

no party founded the klan.

[Safety]

no party founded the klan.

I will bet you 8 fossils that my post will be ignored and he will continue to harp about party.

[resister]

no party founded the klan.
not what a Canadian said.

[resister]

I will bet you 8 fossils that my post will be ignored and he will continue to harp about party.
Bet that up, homey. Your buddy CS bought it up. Now that he posted 5 or so links that proved it wrong.....

[Safety]

Bet that up, homey. Your buddy CS bought it up. Now that he posted 5 or so links that proved it wrong.....

In which he apologized for typing the wrong term. I admire him for that, because he is one of a very few that would own up to a fuckup. Especially, in light of how some continue to harp on it like a chihuahua nipping at ankles.

[resister]

Crazy people, like the guy at the baseball field will just become more active as well. It's time for it.
I don't agree. Sorry, no spinning this ^ jet

[Common Sense]

Good deflection, can you answer the question, WHAT PARTY FOUNDED THE KLAN?

At this point in the thread, it is easy to see why you would answer a question with a question.

No party founded the Klan. I already said I mistakenly implied Republicans did. Former confederate soldiers did.

I asked the question to illustrate a point. If the Klan belongs to no party now, why is it necessary that they were founded by one?

[Common Sense]

Bet that up, homey. Your buddy CS bought it up. Now that he posted 5 or so links that proved it wrong.....

I didn't bring it up. I was responding to the allegation that the Democrat party founded them. I mistakenly added Republicans when I did not intend to.

[resister]

In which he apologized for typing the wrong term. I admire him for that, because he is one of a very few that would own up to a fuckup. I applaud any time someone owns a wrong.

Especially if you misspell veteran as republican.

Got any more spots open in safety spelling university?
On another note, gullible is not a word in the dictionary....

[Common Sense]

I applaud any time someone owns a wrong.

Especially if you misspell veteran as republican.

Got any more spots open in safety spelling university?
On another note, gullible is not a word in the dictionary....
I didn't say misspelled. You calling me a liar?

I admit my errors. You can believe me or not.

[resister]

No party founded the Klan. I already said I mistakenly implied Republicans did. Former confederate soldiers did.

I asked the question to illustrate a point. If the Klan belongs to no party now, why is it necessary that they were founded by one?
I would believe that, if you did not go on to defend it for like, at least 2 pages....:rollseyes: Pu-leese

[Safety]

I applaud any time someone owns a wrong.

Especially if you misspell veteran as republican.

Got any more spots open in safety spelling university?
On another note, gullible is not a word in the dictionary....

Class is full, plus you didn't meet the prerequisites.

[resister]

I didn't say misspelled. You calling me a liar?

I admit my errors. You can believe me or not.
No, not a liar, just defended it for umpteen post...

[Common Sense]

I would believe that, if you did not go on to defend it for like, at least 2 pages....:rollseyes: Pu-leese

I didn't defend it. I claimed I didn't say it. Why would I claim I didn't say it if I thought I had?

anyways...I don't really care if you don't belive me, but I'm not a liar.

[Common Sense]

No, not a liar, just defended it for umpteen post...

...and actually you are accusing me of lying.

[resister]

If some folks were not busted out on false claims, they would still be owning them.

[Safety]

...and actually you are accusing me of lying.

Yup.

[Common Sense]

If some folks were not busted out on false claims, they would still be owning them.
Get a grip dude.

[Cletus]

I don't care if people belive me. It would make no sense for me to call them Reps. These are the people who fought Lincoln's army. It's no wonder people called me out on it. Frankly I had no idea what they were going on about until I looked at my post.

Don't worry about it, CS. It was probably just a case of your thoughts moving faster than your fingers.

I have done it more than once.

[jet57]

I don't agree. Sorry, no spinning this ^ jet

What spinning; explain that.

[resister]

What spinning; explain that.
You said "it is time" when referring to the congress shooting.

Sorry jet, you gotta own that

[jet57]

You said "it is time" when referring to the congress shooting.

Sorry jet, you gotta own that

Nope; sorry you're spinning and misrepresenting what I said. The [overall backlash is what it's time for. That shooting is just a symptom.

It's important that you read what I'm writing and not read into it.