Trump was likely correct about non citizens voting.

[Tahuyaman]

An objective analysis shows that Trump was correct when he said that millions of non citizens voted in the 2016 presidential election. This is a clear explanation as to why Democrats oppose voter ID laws.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/did-votes-by-noncitizens-cost-trump-the-2016-popular-vote-sure-looks-that-way/


Election 2016: Late in 2016, we created a stir by suggesting that Donald Trump was likely right when he claimed that millions of noncitizens had illegally voted in the U.S. election. Now, a study by a New Jersey think tank provides new evidence that that's what happened.
Last November, just weeks after his Electoral College win that gave him the presidency, then President-elect Donald Trump tweeted, "In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally."

[midcan5]

I've read in right wing pubs that the tooth fairy voted three times and big foot ten times. While that can't be confirmed, one flat earther claimed he saw spirits at one polling place, he couldn't confirm if they could pull the lever though. And so it goes....

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-800000-votes-non-citizens/

Investigate: "Figure things out for yourself. Spend more time on long articles. Subsidize investigative journalism by subscribing to print media. Realize that some of what is on the internet is there to harm you. Learn about sites that investigate propaganda campaigns (some of which comes from abroad). Take responsibility for what you communicate with others." Lesson 11 'On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century' by Timothy Snyder

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33917107-on-tyranny

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33670561-the-destruction-of-hillary-clinton

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27833494-dark-money (http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27833494-dark-money?from_search=true)


"There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true." Soren Kierkegaard

[Common]

Of course hes right, do you think for one second sanctuary cities are going to really screen who votes for democrats.

[Peter1469]

I posted a thread on this. Lots of illegals and non-citizens vote in all of our elections. We need to cut that off.

Hillary's claim to the popular vote is a myth. Illegals don't count.

[Tahuyaman]

There is a reason the Democrats are so opposed to voter ID laws and securing our borders.

[Bo-4]

Dude, you are F-ing hilarious :grin:

James D Agresti is a certifiable loon and AmericanStinker/CrisisMagazine columnist.

What a great thinker!
:laughing9:

http://www.americanthinker.com/author/james_d_agresti/

http://www.crisismagazine.com/author/james-agresti

[Tahuyaman]

Anyone who counters left wing dogma is a certifiable loon. They are worse if they do it in an informed, factual and intelligent manner.

[gamewell45]

An objective analysis shows that Trump was correct when he said that millions of non citizens voted in the 2016 presidential election. This is a clear explanation as to why Democrats oppose voter ID laws.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/did-votes-by-noncitizens-cost-trump-the-2016-popular-vote-sure-looks-that-way/


Election 2016: Late in 2016, we created a stir by suggesting that Donald Trump was likely right when he claimed that millions of noncitizens had illegally voted in the U.S. election. Now, a study by a New Jersey think tank provides new evidence that that's what happened.
Last November, just weeks after his Electoral College win that gave him the presidency, then President-elect Donald Trump tweeted, "In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally."

There has been no concrete evidence; mainly supposition on the part of a right-wing website and as such must be taken with a grain of salt.

[Tahuyaman]

There has been no concrete evidence; mainly supposition on the part of a right-wing website and as such must be taken with a grain of salt.

There's plenty of concrete evidence, but the dominate liberal media chooses to ignore it. They support the liberal agenda.

[Agent Zero]

An objective analysis shows that Trump was correct when he said that millions of non citizens voted in the 2016 presidential election. This is a clear explanation as to why Democrats oppose voter ID laws.
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/did-votes-by-noncitizens-cost-trump-the-2016-popular-vote-sure-looks-that-way/
Election 2016: Late in 2016, we created a stir by suggesting that Donald Trump was likely right when he claimed that millions of noncitizens had illegally voted in the U.S. election. Now, a study by a New Jersey think tank provides new evidence that that's what happened.
Last November, just weeks after his Electoral College win that gave him the presidency, then President-elect Donald Trump tweeted, "In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally."


"MAY"

(Also a repeat OP)

[Agent Zero]

Anyone who counters left wing dogma is a certifiable loon.
Correct.

[AZ Jim]

I posted a thread on this. Lots of illegals and non-citizens vote in all of our elections. We need to cut that off.

Hillary's claim to the popular vote is a myth. Illegals don't count.So you have the exact illegal vote count and who they were cast for? Link it.

[Agent Zero]

So you have the exact illegal vote count and who they were cast for? Link it.
I'll bet all those Russian hackers account for most of the votes.

[Tahuyaman]

There's no question that there were millions of non citizens voting in our last presidential election. They MAY not have all voted for Hillary Clinton, but it's not likely they did not.

[Agent Zero]

There's no question that there were millions of non citizens voting in our last presidential election. They MAY not have all voted for Hillary Clinton, but it's not likely they did not.
If by 'millions', you mean about four or five. ok.

[Agent Zero]

Another alt right story debunked.
http://www.snopes.com/illegal-immigrants-2008-election/

[resister]

Another alt right story debunked.
http://www.snopes.com/illegal-immigrants-2008-election/
What an impeccable source....lol If you do a 180 link Prison Planet

[Tahuyaman]

If by 'millions', you mean about four or five. ok. possibly. Maybe more, maybe less.
The

[Tahuyaman]

What an impeccable source....lol If you do a 180 link Prison Planet

Next he'll be citing the Onion.

[Agent Zero]

What an impeccable source....lol If you do a 180 link Prison Planet
Yes, Snopes is an impeccable source. I'll never understand the right and their refusal to accept anything as credible in fact checking. In fact, according to you guys, there's no, absolutely no, fact check site out there that's viable. They're all left wing shills.

I find that hard to believe, particularly when they cite credible soures.

possibly. Maybe more, maybe less.
The
I meant four to five people, not millions. lol

Next he'll be citing the Onion.
Do me a favor.

Give me a link to one, just one, credible fact checking source out there. Then provide some examples of their fact checking and proof of their credibility.

Thank you.