Appears the Nation Now Question the DNC Hack

[hanger4]

"There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative."

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

The narrative slowly crumbles ??

[Crepitus]

Meh. Been trying to push that nonsense for months. Still won't fly.

[resister]

Meh. Been trying to push that nonsense for months. Still won't fly.
When proven true, will your world crumble? Like being unplugged from the Matrix, to abrupltly?

[Crepitus]

When proven true, will your world crumble? Like being unplugged from the Matrix, to abrupltly?

It's nonsense, nothing for any sane person to worry about.

[resister]

It's nonsense, nothing for any sane person to worry about.
Sane people wait for facts before declaring they know what is going on....:rollseyes:

[Ethereal]

Guccifer 2.0 was an obvious fiction invented by establishment insiders. The only original material he published was the contact information of some Democratic donors. Everything else was just recycled from the public domain. He also amateurishly left Russian fingerprints over almost everything he did. And there is zero proof that he actually hacked anything or that he is actually a Russian. It's just a psy-op.

[resister]

Guccifer 2.0 was an obvious fiction invented by establishment insiders. The only original material he published was the contact information of some Democratic donors. Everything else was just recycled from the public domain. He also amateurishly left Russian fingerprints over almost everything he did. And there is zero proof that he actually hacked anything or that he is actually a Russian. It's just a psy-op.19354

[Crepitus]

Sane people wait for facts before declaring they know what is going on....:rollseyes:

The facts are already known. The DNC was hacked.

[resister]

The facts are already known. The DNC was hacked.
Sure, on a thumb drive.

[Ethereal]

The facts are already known. The DNC was hacked.
That is not a fact, it is speculation.

[Crepitus]

That is not a fact, it is speculation.

https://www.cnet.com/news/how-experts-decided-russia-hacked-dnc-election/

[hanger4]

https://www.cnet.com/news/how-experts-decided-russia-hacked-dnc-election/

^^ parrots ^^

Call me when the FBI releases their forensic analysis report.

[Ethereal]

https://www.cnet.com/news/how-experts-decided-russia-hacked-dnc-election/

From the article:


We'll probably never really find out what the US intelligence community or CrowdStrike know or how they know it. This is what we do know:

CrowdStrike and other cyberdetectives had spotted tools and approaches they'd seen Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear use for years. Cozy Bear is believed to be either Russia's Federal Security Service, known as the FSB, or its Foreign Intelligence Service, the SVR. Fancy Bear is thought to be Russia's military intel agency, GRU.

In other words, the Russian hacking claim rests entirely upon the BELIEF of a private security contractor who won't share their evidence with anyone. That is not even close to a fact.

[stjames1_53]

The facts are already known. The DNC was hacked.

nope.............I said it way back when, and I'll stand by it today.........it was an inside job.............. a disgruntled Hillary worker, some noodge who was planted in there by Sanders...........the list is quite long, but it was still an inside job. The fact that the DNC doesn't want their servers accessed until they can clean it up speaks volumes