Brett's new science lessons.

[Brett Nortje]

Yes, they are back! i was toying with some cross reference type stuff and found that i was drawn back to chemistry, so decided to start this entry. I will include cross discipline physics in here, so anybody studying for a batchelor of sciences, or pure chemistry or sometimes engineering can draw upon my 'lessons.' my terms might be different, or non existent in traditional fields, but you do not need to read it if you want to defend the establishment.

So, onto one of my common terms; density. this would be where the toughness of the material is under question. this density comes from the amount of protons supplying magnetism, the fundamental force of attraction, with the like amount of electrons, which will be attracted to the protons via magnetic fields, and, electrically bond the materials, okay? this bonding leads to density, where the further down the periodic table you go, the more of these things there are.

Now, each density leads to a different "boiling point." the hotter it gets, the more materials you can burn. iron has a higher boiling point than lithium, for example, as it is held together with more density or force, yes? the hotter it gets, the more the material relaxes, separating slowly, like gold melts and breaks up slowly in a furnace. the reason for this is that we need the "heat" or "friction" to get the materials to get into a more manageable state to mould, and, this is due to the actual heat 'mixing with the materials' and expanding them, as you know when it is hot, the metal in your house expands, especially on doors with metal parts, making them hard to close sometimes? same here, the heat will make it grow, expanding density, as, with this life giving force of heat, and all materials and life wants to "dominate" the world and universe by expanding and "cellular division," these metals, gases and liquids will also expand their territory and size, whether they want to or not. this heat gets between the protons and electrons, leading to the whole thing slowly dissolving from a solid, to a liquid, to a gas - it never disappears!

[Brett Nortje]

With science, it is not only about boiling points, but, as a chemical engineer, for example, or, someone into smelting or something, most of what you need to know is covered by a few more formulas. this is sound theory i have given you, trust me - if this excites you and you are thinking about becoming a chemist of some sort, then by all means, research further on the net!

Another 'lesson' in chemistry could be about "mixtures." we have already found that everything seeks to dominate the world through expansion, and, given the fundamental force of growth, will, yes? now we want to know why, for example, one litre of oil contaminates a huge volume of water... how and why?

Well, if we were to observe that oil is basically 'biomass,' that stems from "ageing," we could understand that all oil under the ocean was once living things, like trees pulped enough and heated enough equals oil, yes?

~ By the way, if you take a tree, and 'burn' it, it will turn to coal, liquefy that and it turns to oil!

So, the oil, which is biomass, which means carbon, yes? carbon is like a gas that is made of the same stuff that goes into diamonds, so you might think it is hard. carbon is the same stuff that goes into soda, being "carbonated drinks" with added sodium, so you might think it is soft. where does carbon sit then, is it the "ultimate chemical?"

Carbon is biomass that has been compressed at various levels. if you look at coal or a diamond, it has been compressed many times, allowing the coal to burn, giving off steam quickly compared to it's weight, and, that is why it is used in combustion engines - it will give off nearly an equal amount of 'energy' as it contains, yes? this is because it is so low down on the periodic table, where the amount of protons and electrons are 'soluble,' or, 'flexible,' as it will be easy to mould - you can crush it with your hands, yes? coal is about the only biomass element, as it will become what it is from living things, and, make up living things too. these living things are highly reactive, as they will react at a very high level, like a nerve in the body is made of carbon, you know... those little hairs as eyelashes that feel so well? very reactive to the world around them, yes?

Diamonds are less reactive as they have been compressed more! that is right, you see those ugly little coal chunks? they, after a while, produce diamonds, where the pigment has been lost due to the original state of things being colourless, as black pigment is acquired, and, as time elapses, pigment is lost due to it being 'pushed out.' this is due to the element crushing the pigment, like a body will reveal a white bone eventually, yes? then, as it gathers dirt, more biomass, it will become black and so forth, of course.

So, carbon is the ultimate chemical for most 'solid stuff.' carbon is very reactive with the world around it, so will mix with many things. the higher up the periodic table you go, the easier these things will mix, as they are 'less dense.' that means that water, for oil spills, will result in something that is denser, being so close to the other on the table, will compliment each other, as oxygen is very reactive, and so is hydrogen, being the fundamental element.

But, you might ask, throwing a blob of gold into the water... why doesn't that mix? well, the gold is in a different state to the other fluids, and, will rather seek to dominate with growing under warm weather, and, being so soft, will just bend and be moulded. but, what about this gold stuff, it is much prettier than coal... why not focus on that for a while?

Well, gold is solid, in that it is very hard to dissolve, yet not bend. it is easy to bend because it is not balanced regarding it's orbital arrangements; the electrons that pair with the protons have other electrons attracted to them - orbitals - that 'protect' the element by forming an electrical field around it that "tastes" the other things around it, to absorb them, for example. the orbitals will move out the way and cover the holes created by the new materials incoming r outgoing because of electron bonding, where it would be like pushing your hand through a swimming pool, where the water will go back to "normal" when you pull your hand out, of course. think of orbitals as a swimming pool around the element, okay?

[Brett Nortje]

Mesons are a part of physics that we will gloss over quickly to see if you can handle physics for your studies, or, if you lose interest. please remember, if you want to be a doctor, you are expected to learn things like this or similar to this, okay?

Mesons, as far as i can figure out, are like 'colours.' they will also be polarized, with 'six points,' which will be attracted to each other, crushing the nucleus and the neutron will be charged with this pulling force. the thing is, the neutron will push back, giving way to energy being produced, so, maybe there is room for meson powered batteries or something? the colours i spoke of come from fluctuations or changes in the intensity of the heat, where the heat will change colour depending on what part of the nucleus it is burning.

Typically, a nucleus has three quarks, being the two up and one down quarks, where the positive result of it, due to spinning in different directions, will result in natural energy - the up quarks - being clockwise, and, the unnatural energy that gives way to friction - the down quarks - being counter clockwise, of course. this means that the three are joined by another three, where the result is like having two drops of water collect to form another bigger drop, or, two play blocks coming together, yes? this forms a vector shape of, instead of a pyramid, of a typical quark arrangement, with six vectors, being very stable and 'tough,' eighteen vectors of a less tough sort, as it is more brittle due to the edges, well, i think so. i think so because there are more flat sides, which means more areas to be stressed out, or, is it less thin edges and projections of the pyramid... which is stronger? well, if you look at it like that, we could say that the triangle of others would be in the centre, if you believe in tessaracts, this would be where you imagine the inside vectors, being of about twelve vectors holding it together from the inside where it gets more durability from, of course. this would of course imply that the inner energy will manifest as colours as it decays, but, it is always rejuvenated by the mass of the positive energy, although that is not enough as the energy of the negative spin will decay it further, as i see that there are not two up quarks to support the eating energy...

So, in nature, they will decay and give rise to basically one set of unpaired quarks, leading to 'friction.' this means, of course, that they will create more negative energy to be stabilized by the excess mass of the positive quarks - they come from orbitals being forced apart, forming electron bonds, then getting too irregular for the typical chemical to support, pushed out, decay and settle.

[Brett Nortje]

Taking a step back from physics, we can move to chemistry again, where we will now analyse 'molecules and cells.' molecules and cells are collections of atoms, and, molecules make cells, of course.

~ I have always thought of chemistry as surface stuff for physics, and, physics as the make up of chemistry, so, physics is just smaller chemistry, of course, according to myself.

So, we have a few atoms that join together sometimes, often in fact. these are molecules, and, if you ever see those molecule structures with the poles between the atoms, these hold them together in the molecule. this is usually done by one atom pairing with tone two or three others, and those looking for balance in the new molecule. this balance is found by sucking force, once more, as the orbitals suck the right things into 'the mix.' this would mean that the atoms are looking for 'fuel to suck,' with things that are usually gases, trying to maintain their liquid or solid state, and, therefore desperately trying to grab hold of something tougher. the 'suck' for the heavier atoms comes from the desire to dominate these lighter cells, as the reactions will usually be where the heavier cells throw the lighter cells into the way of the reactions, sacrificing them for their own sake, while they may just keep them to try to dominate them; with oil and water, the suck comes from the water trying to take the heavier form, and, the oil being sucked by more water, of course.

If we were to observe that molecules are just atoms there to be joined by gluons that carry current to join them - once again, electron bonds... i do not believe in hydrogen bonds as these are made of electrons too! - then we will understand that this is also down to 'frequency,' yes? this frequency will attract the lower frequency or lighter things, as they have less electron orbitals to generate current that is potential, of course. once these things, especially in liquid form, as this is the current carrier of note, join together, they 'cross pollinate quickly.' this would be where the would 'carry bits' between each other, contaminating each other for life.

[Brett Nortje]

Ions are basically atoms 'that give off electricity,' where they will have more electrons than protons. this will be where the lone electron, the one that is sharing the proton with the other electrons, will instead look for a lone proton. lone protons will be available with uncharged metals, as gases and liquids would not be able to satisfy the electrons, as, the 'choice' of theirs is to stay with as heavy a material as possible. this means they will prefer, metals, then liquids, then gases - imagine the plugs of your household just zapping you going through the air?

So, if you want to control electricity, your best bet is to use metals or liquids. to charge a material with electricity, you need to merely create a spark, where the excess - that spark - of energy, comes from the dead mass being "charged." this means that, through friction, you have created heat, and, through heat, you have created "electricity," and, also "magnetism." yes, that spark is electromagnetism at work, the electrons will look for a path to continue their free role, and the protons that control magnetism will draw the electrons back to the materials away from the gases or liquids, as they will seek the heaviest collection of protons they can. imagine sharing one extra electron or sandwich with three people or a hundred people - you are going to get more of it if there is one being shared through a hundred people than three people as the percentage share is higher, yes? it is a smaller percentage to share, of course.

Anions and cations - these are charged materials. they contain the "electricity" or "magnetism" of the material. if the anion has an extra electron, then it is obvious the cation is missing an electron, yes? this means the material will automatically turn magnetic if it is sparked, for a few moments - if you were to strike flint, you would feel the flints getting heavier for a while, yes? this is magnetism attracting the flints to the floor, or, earth, which has a magnetic field called "gravity."

[Peter1469]

What is gravity?

[resister]

With science, it is not only about boiling points, but, as a chemical engineer, for example, or, someone into smelting or something, most of what you need to know is covered by a few more formulas. this is sound theory i have given you, trust me - if this excites you and you are thinking about becoming a chemist of some sort, then by all means, research further on the net!

Another 'lesson' in chemistry could be about "mixtures." we have already found that everything seeks to dominate the world through expansion, and, given the fundamental force of growth, will, yes? now we want to know why, for example, one litre of oil contaminates a huge volume of water... how and why?

Well, if we were to observe that oil is basically 'biomass,' that stems from "ageing," we could understand that all oil under the ocean was once living things, like trees pulped enough and heated enough equals oil, yes?

~ By the way, if you take a tree, and 'burn' it, it will turn to coal, liquefy that and it turns to oil!

So, the oil, which is biomass, which means carbon, yes? carbon is like a gas that is made of the same stuff that goes into diamonds, so you might think it is hard. carbon is the same stuff that goes into soda, being "carbonated drinks" with added sodium, so you might think it is soft. where does carbon sit then, is it the "ultimate chemical?"

Carbon is biomass that has been compressed at various levels. if you look at coal or a diamond, it has been compressed many times, allowing the coal to burn, giving off steam quickly compared to it's weight, and, that is why it is used in combustion engines - it will give off nearly an equal amount of 'energy' as it contains, yes? this is because it is so low down on the periodic table, where the amount of protons and electrons are 'soluble,' or, 'flexible,' as it will be easy to mould - you can crush it with your hands, yes? coal is about the only biomass element, as it will become what it is from living things, and, make up living things too. these living things are highly reactive, as they will react at a very high level, like a nerve in the body is made of carbon, you know... those little hairs as eyelashes that feel so well? very reactive to the world around them, yes?

Diamonds are less reactive as they have been compressed more! that is right, you see those ugly little coal chunks? they, after a while, produce diamonds, where the pigment has been lost due to the original state of things being colourless, as black pigment is acquired, and, as time elapses, pigment is lost due to it being 'pushed out.' this is due to the element crushing the pigment, like a body will reveal a white bone eventually, yes? then, as it gathers dirt, more biomass, it will become black and so forth, of course.

So, carbon is the ultimate chemical for most 'solid stuff.' carbon is very reactive with the world around it, so will mix with many things. the higher up the periodic table you go, the easier these things will mix, as they are 'less dense.' that means that water, for oil spills, will result in something that is denser, being so close to the other on the table, will compliment each other, as oxygen is very reactive, and so is hydrogen, being the fundamental element.

But, you might ask, throwing a blob of gold into the water... why doesn't that mix? well, the gold is in a different state to the other fluids, and, will rather seek to dominate with growing under warm weather, and, being so soft, will just bend and be moulded. but, what about this gold stuff, it is much prettier than coal... why not focus on that for a while?

Well, gold is solid, in that it is very hard to dissolve, yet not bend. it is easy to bend because it is not balanced regarding it's orbital arrangements; the electrons that pair with the protons have other electrons attracted to them - orbitals - that 'protect' the element by forming an electrical field around it that "tastes" the other things around it, to absorb them, for example. the orbitals will move out the way and cover the holes created by the new materials incoming r outgoing because of electron bonding, where it would be like pushing your hand through a swimming pool, where the water will go back to "normal" when you pull your hand out, of course. think of orbitals as a swimming pool around the element, okay?
Mercury amalgamates gold. What do you make of that? Gold bearing ore is mixed into mercury and absorbed into the mercury, then the non gold ore (dross) is separated. Next the mercury goes into a retort oven, similar to a moon shine still. When heated, the mercury vaporizes and recondenses in the coil and can be reused perpetually. Voila! the gold is left behind in its pure state.

[Brett Nortje]

Mercury amalgamates gold. What do you make of that? Gold bearing ore is mixed into mercury and absorbed into the mercury, then the non gold ore (dross) is separated. Next the mercury goes into a retort oven, similar to a moon shine still. When heated, the mercury vaporizes and recondenses in the coil and can be reused perpetually. Voila! the gold is left behind in its pure state.
I learned something new... i am going to be rich!

[Brett Nortje]

What is gravity?
There is supposed to be a graviton, but i am sure it is just down to pure "magnetism." this is where something is attracted to something else due to mass and charge.

[resister]

I learned something new... i am going to be rich!
Don't forget where you heard it first! Remember me when we enter into thy kingdom!

[waltky]

Einstein proven right again...
http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif
Neutron star collision has changed our understanding of universe: scientists
Wed, Oct 18, 2017 - THEORY PROVED: The observation of the collision is another feather in the cap for Albert Einstein, who predicted gravitational waves more than 100 years ago


For the first time, scientists have witnessed the cataclysmic crash of two ultra-dense neutron stars in a galaxy far away and concluded that such impacts forged at least half the gold in the universe. Shock waves and light flashes from the collision traveled about 130 million light-years to be captured by detectors on Earth on Aug. 17, excited teams revealed at news conferences held around the globe on Monday as a dozen related science papers were published in top academic journals. “We witnessed history unfolding in front of our eyes: two neutron stars drawing closer, closer ... turning faster and faster around each other, then colliding and scattering debris all over the place,” joint discoverer Benoit Mours of France’s CNRS research institute said. The groundbreaking observation solved a number of physics riddles and sent ripples of excitement through the scientific community.

Most jaw-dropping for many, the data finally revealed where much of the gold, platinum, uranium, mercury and other heavy elements in the universe come from. Telescopes saw evidence of newly-forged material in the fallout, the teams said — a source long suspected, now confirmed. “It makes it quite clear that a significant fraction, maybe half, maybe more, of the heavy elements in the universe are actually produced by this kind of collision,” said physicist Patrick Sutton, a member of the US-based Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), which contributed to the find. Neutron stars are the condensed, burnt-out cores that remain when massive stars run out of fuel, blow up and die. Typically about 20km in diameter, but with more mass than the sun, they are highly radioactive and ultra-dense — a handful of material from one weighs as much as Mount Everest.


http://www.taipeitimes.com/images/2017/10/18/P07-171018-315.jpg
An undated illustration provided by the National Science Foundation shows an artist’s impression of two merging neutron stars.

It had been theorized that mergers of two such exotic bodies would create ripples in the fabric of space-time known as gravitational waves, as well as flashes of high-energy radiation called gamma ray bursts. On Aug. 17, detectors witnessed both phenomena, 1.7 seconds apart, coming from the same spot in the constellation of Hydra. “It was clear to us within minutes that we had a binary neutron star detection,” said David Shoemaker, another member of LIGO, which has detectors in Livingston, Louisiana, and Hanford, Washington. “The signals were much too beautiful to be anything but that.” The observation was the fruit of years of labor by thousands of scientists.

Along with LIGO, they include teams from Europe’s Virgo gravitational wave detector in Italy, and a number of ground and space-based telescopes, including NASA’s Hubble. “This event marks a turning point in observational astronomy and will lead to a treasure trove of scientific results,” said Bangalore Sathyaprakash from Cardiff University’s School of Physics and Astronomy, recalling “the most exciting [discovery] of my scientific life.” “It is tremendously exciting to experience a rare event that transforms our understanding of the workings of the universe,” added France Cordova, director of the National Science Foundation, which funds LIGO. The detection is another feather in the cap for physicist Albert Einstein, who predicted gravitational waves more than 100 years ago. Three LIGO pioneers — Barry Barish, Kip Thorne and Rainer Weiss — were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics this month for the observation of gravitational waves, without which the latest discovery would not have been possible.

MORE (http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2017/10/18/2003680591)

[Brett Nortje]

I have for a long time thought those chemical structure things are very complex, and, that they have a natural algorithm where they cling to things in preferred states. Obviously, the liquids will bond with other liquids first, and so forth, but in mixtures in the body especially, there must be rhyme to the reason?

So, we have a few gases trapped in the blood stream. If we were to observe that nitrogen is poisonous, yet essential to the workings of the body, is it possible that all gases are poisonous to the body - yes, I think so! So, it is a collection of poisons, where, the poisons click together to fin the right way to accumulate to be something, a molecule, mind you.

If we were to observe that acidity holds things together, as they will react with each other, and, form molecules due to acidity, then this is the building block of life, you could say? This is what I have been looking for! Acidity guides how molecules form. This means they are drawn together by how acidic they are, with, the more acidic elements being drawn together with the less acidic elements, of course. This would be where there is 'will' of the atom, affecting those with less will, of course.

Now, if we were to observe that acidity is about how much a element will dissolve, or, react, then the more it dissolves the more drawn to something that does not dissolve there is, because, it seeks 'stability.' This is basic homeostasis, of course. This is where the more stable elements draw in the less stable ones, and, collect to for molecules.

[Brett Nortje]

With science, the objective is what you learn in high school, to find balance or stress points not to be messed with! If we were to observe that mixtures will mix any way their 'density' allows, then the thicker the liquid gas or solid the harder it is to mix, because, it does not mix as quickly. We all exist at the same rat, so, finding mixing rtes r atoms would be to our advantage with planning overnight mixtures and so forth.

So, what is he mixing rate? If were to observe the speed of electricity, that is the speed of gases mixing, yes? This is because the protons are attracted to the electrons at certain speeds, and, that is where the electrical effects of particles influence the speed of migration between atoms, or, the speed they bond at.

If the atoms will mix at all, there will always be resistance due to 'density.' This density is like mass that resists other mass, as, things that weight anything are occupying space that other things also can.

~ Remember, photons do not have mass because they are burning mass, they are a 'parasite' on the particle or atom, okay?

So, the denser the atoms, the harder they are and longer they take to 'mix.' Metals also mix due to boiling points being reached and then they soften as per the materials weight, which can be observed on the grids there are.

Now, if we were to observe that anything under a certain point of mass will mix - there is no way to know unless there are tests in a lab - then we will be able to find the rate they mix at. If this rate is equal to the mass being liquid or gas, then we can safely say that it must be 'equal to mass minus mass' or something to that effect.

[Brett Nortje]

I was talking to someone now, and, found that if you take the mass of the object or material, we can find the size of it!

This follows that the material will have mass compressed due to orbital activity. The more orbitals it has, the 'harder' it is, and, that means that it will be more compressed, yes? If you were to observe that a sponge that is full of soap or 'clean' or empty is compared, you will agree with that, yes?

Then, we find the mass. Mass equals weight of the material compared to density. So, for each electron, which 'pulls,' there should be a divider that needs to be observed regarding the size, as, each thing weighs the same with the same properties, of course.

[Brett Nortje]

Some of you may wonder why we label physics and particles with spin and half life? These terms are there to find the decay rate of the particle, where, it will need a new one to survive. This is like you know those big barrels of molten metal, where they cool down, the stuff that was hot has 'decayed,' okay? That stuff is unstable, like fire - it will go out once the free electrons find their mate, otherwise their 'hormones' drive them to 'date rape' all metals until they do.

The reason the stuff cools down is because the fire is out, the temperature for the hormones to be active is stopped or diminished, and, they will run out of fuels in this regard. This means that the metal will set as it cools, remembering that in deep space, where the temperature is very cold, things will drift away from stable temperatures and disintegrate, as it is either too hot - the stars or sun - or too cold - too much absence of heat. Heat is the foundation of all matter, as it holds it together through friction - the only reason we are held together is because the little things of the world are reacting due to a balance of the strong force and weak force - electromagnetism, where, the body is formed by attraction by friction, like sparks will look for a piece of wood, or, fire spreads, okay? The fire spreading will result in things being welded together, don't you agree?

[Brett Nortje]

With energy, there is a build up of 'friction.' This friction is energy, as, it manifests itself into 'reactions.' These reactions are where something happens, and, anything that is happening is kinetic energy and anything that is possibly going to happen is potential energy, that much we know, yes?

So, what is energy? This is where, as we found, things will happen, have happened or are happening. These things are releases of energy, and they will result in 'effects and changes,' of course.

There are many terms for more specific types of energy measurements, like mass, electromagnetism, joules, stress and others too. All sciences are studies of these changes and measurements and variables within, even humanities, but they use terms for feelings and cultural things, the psychological changes taking place, of course.

What is the goal of science but to help understand energy?

[Brett Nortje]

It is my conclusion, after reading through some data, that ions ONLY form due to radiation. This is where the effects of the light onto the material leads to a reaction where the mass will admit the radiation into it's electron clouds, being "orbitals," and, then emit colours from this. This is also where anions are created, and, with the creation of anions, which are electrically charged, thus they attract more electrons, there is a cation created, where the excitement created by the anion steals the electrons from the next atom, where the lack of electrons leads to excess protons and thus a cation is created.

~ This means that cations and anions must be in equal number, maybe created by 'the electromagnetic force' itself, yes?

So, clearing up the light debate, with seeing and colours we could safely say we only see with the heating and varying levels of heat onto mass, where it emits anions for our nerves to detect in varying levels.

To create gem stones, we need to merely heat materials with radiation. This would be where we shine all sorts of lights at high levels onto soft beach stones, to make them become gem stones. I would suggest U.V. lights and other lighting techniques.

[Brett Nortje]

These are the core of the particles that conduct energy, being the photon, that is not a particle but a parasite, as it has no mass, as it lives off the other particles for it's existence, where it merely consumes mass as a fire. Yes, photons are the fire element, and, are a product of friction, in the form of the reaction that emits light itself. This means the photon will merely conduct frequency or radiation, in fact being radiation, as it is the field around the electrons, which we know well. Otherwise the gluon is a product of repulsion between electrons, so, makes the atoms of bonds more stable, through adding charges that repulse each other. They are therefore something that exists only because electrons are generating them, like the photons. This means they will form appear and disappear, being complex gases electrical charges communicating to tell each other that 'the circle is closed,' like a bouncer, if you will. Or, like a magnetic field of two similarly charged magnets, or, the repulsion of solid waste to the nerves, where the excess, which is what they are, or, like two tribes of lions pushing to keep the others off their grounds, even though they are the same species. Then, there are th weakly charged particles, excess of the weak force, the excess of the electron.

I conclude that the only real boson that emits charge is the electron, as everything else is merely there because of the electron, like a shadow of it.

[Brett Nortje]

These are the proper particles that provide mass. The bosons will only feed off the fermions, and, that is because they have a positive spin. Typically, if it spins positively, it is ageing, like all things natural. That is why they die out when they are shed or bled off the matter. Fermions on the other hand are spinning anticlockwise, so as to provide resistance to this ageing, where they will feed the energy of kinematic types. This means they will be forcing the universe back to normal, crushing it with gravity and electromagnetism, where the universe would collapse if not kept stable by the unstable particles. Yes, this means things would be reduced to zero if there was nothing separating them, make sense? Like a black hole, crushing us to the centre.

So, these things are like dead in the water, mass that does not move. The electrons are responsible for friction and the bosons are the by product, like waste that displaces the the official particles, or, the back stage that supports the actors of the play. Where fermions are the atoms, the mesons are the things that carry information, or, are charged by the particles, of course. This means mesons are parasites on fermions, and, that means the whole spectrum changes to dormant and kinetic energies. The fermions have mass, unlike the mesons, which are just frequency itself.