GOP funds "Lyin' Comey" site - And it makes zero sense

[Bo-4]

So much for the Party of Law & Order/ Rule of Law .. oh how the party of Lincoln has devolved.



The Republican Party is racing to assassinate James Comey’s character (https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/12/politics/trump-comey-publicity-tour/index.html) before his tell-all book hits shelves next Tuesday. The former FBI director’s literary debut is expected to paint Donald Trump as an authoritarian oaf (https://www.axios.com/preview-of-exclusive-abc-interview-with-james-comey-1523413777-c6002b59-9545-4329-9734-92ffcc70cfef.html) with no respect for the rule of law. The Republican National Committee has built a website (https://lyincomey.com/) explaining why you shouldn’t believe that.

With the White House’s blessing, the RNC is launching a multifaceted campaign to rebrand George W. Bush’s deputy attorney general as “Lyin’ Comey.” The party is airing digital ads and dispersing talking points to Republican officials across the country, all built around three core arguments (https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/12/politics/trump-comey-publicity-tour/index.html):

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/why-the-gops-campaign-against-lyin-comey-makes-no-sense.html

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRN3Y9XUkAE6D3H.jpg

[Tahuyaman]

More partisan motived nonsene which belongs in the rants section.

[MisterVeritis]

So much for the Party of Law & Order/ Rule of Law .. oh how the party of Lincoln has devolved.
Thanks. I bookmarked it!

https://lyincomey.com/

[hanger4]

So much for the Party of Law & Order/ Rule of Law .. oh how the party of Lincoln has devolved.[/FONT][/COLOR]http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/why-the-gops-campaign-against-lyin-comey-makes-no-sense.htmlhttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRN3Y9XUkAE6D3H.jpg[/FONT][/COLOR]What doesn't make sense Bo-4 ?? Seems the site documented some of Comey's lies, are they, the site, wrong ??

[exotix]

GOP Trumpf bootlickers makes perfect sense ...


http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1523591672/100_1580_joigfr.jpg
http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1523591577/100_1579_ibiggk.jpg

[Bo-4]

What doesn't make sense Bo-4 ?? Seems the site documented some of Comey's lies, are they, the site, wrong ??

Please do provide us that list - and READ the story prior to comment.

Thanks

[Bo-4]

GOP Trumpf bootlickers makes perfect sense ...

Bill Kristol weighs in on your photo - LoL

https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/984373163214737410

*He's a pretty fun read on the Twit machine btw ;-)

https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/984782380950020096

[hanger4]

Please do provide us that list - and READ the story prior to comment.ThanksBo you know I read the OP, their "makes no sense" makes no sense. Comey has lied and under oath several times. He's shot down his own credibility with his prior actions.My question stands. As has been stated already Comey's book = Wolff's book, full of discrepancies.

[hanger4]

Please do provide us that list - and READ the story prior to comment.ThanksYou can read the site yourself, here's a list from elsewhere; ........... https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/is-james-comey-a-serial-liar/

[Bo-4]

You can read the site yourself, here's a list from elsewhere; ........... https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/is-james-comey-a-serial-liar/

Translation: I have nothing

Face it hanger - Comey has more integrity in his pinky fingernail than Donnie Dumpster has in his entire being.

[hanger4]

Translation: I have nothingFace it hanger - Comey has more integrity in his pinky fingernail than Donnie Dumpster has in his entire being.Two links have been provided to you/forum to peruse and you say I have nothing. ............ Don't start Bo, stay real.

[MMC]

Comey: I Made a Controversial Email Investigation Decision to Protect Hillary's Legitimacy as President.....


Matt touched on this (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/04/13/heres-what-fbi-director-james-comey-admits-in-his-new-bookand-why-some-liberals-n2470515) earlier, but this disclosure from fired FBI Director James Comey really highlights the extent to which key decisions he made over the course of the Clinton email investigation were made through a politicized, non-law-enforcement-centric, prism. Ironically, by making this admission, which he blithely skates past, Comey effectively confirms a core complaint shared by his critics on the Right and Left alike: That his self-importance and ego turned him into a problematically political actor. Liberals -- who, ironically (https://twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/984619870934523906), will drive Comey's book sales -- are still livid (https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/984771308134260736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2018 %2F04%2F13%2Fcomey-polling-dictate-handling-hillary-clinton%2F) that the Bureau's ex-chief decided to notify Congress that he was re-engaging the dormant Clinton email probe just days prior to the election, based on newly-discovered information. They point to some analysis (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/) that this move could have cost Clinton the election, even though Comey reasserted his recommendation not to recommend charges before voters went to the polls. In his book, Comey insists he took this action for Hillary's own good (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/12/books/review/james-comey-a-higher-loyalty.html):


"But I don't know." Insert [shrug emoji] here. He thought she was going to win, so this was about protecting her legitimacy as president. Oops! Here's the thing: Even if you're sympathetic to Comey's reasoning at the time, why should political polling have played any role whatsoever in the decision-making process regarding how a criminal investigation is conducted? Of course there was going to be unique sensitivities at play, given who was under scrutiny. But allowing political prognostications to color and impact major choices lends credence to the idea that law enforcement has become dangerously politicized. Democrats will also argue that Comey's original sin was breaking precedent and commenting on the probe at all. If he wasn't going to recommend charges (he writes that he was dubious (https://twitter.com/newsbyhughes/status/984546571600715776) of Loretta Lynch's impartiality in the matter, due to still-classified information), he should have stuck with tradition and kept his mouth shut. Instead, he very publicly castigated (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/07/06/analysis-the-fbi-directors-devastating-indictmentless-indictment-of-hillary-clinton-n2188349) Clinton's "extremely reckless" conduct in the process of quasi-exonerating her of criminal wrongdoing. In many Republicans' mind, that latter bit was Comey's grave error. (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/11/07/analysis-comeys-biggest-mistake-came-in-july-n2242262) Clinton's conduct fit the bill for gross negligence (as Comey himself admitted (https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/751086377463414784)), and his excuses about proving "intent" were both irrelevant (https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook/) and unpersuasive (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/07/07/analysis-why-gowdys-point-in-grilling-comey-was-so-important-n2189326). Clinton should have been charged. Did Comey decide not to push for that outcome because he thought doing so might be too disruptive to the state of the presidential race? Did he perform a polling analysis during his process of weighing this determination?


Comey is also back in the business of discussing the so-called "pee tape" allegations from the unsubstantiated Steele dossier, to which President Trump strenuously objected. For some reason, Comey has decided to say (https://hotair.com/archives/2018/04/13/comey-pee-tape-real-know/) that the claim could be true, even though he has no idea either way. As for that infamous dossier, ABC anchor George Stephanopolous has taped an exclusive interview with the author of A Higher Loyalty, and here's one of the exchanges that has leaked (https://twitter.com/charliespiering/status/984775072505352192) ahead of Sunday's broadcast:


So Comey knew all about the partisan provenance of the explosive and unconfirmed file that had been compiled against Trump, but never informed Trump (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/04/13/comey-didnt-tell-trump-the-infamous-dossier-was-financed-by-hillary-clinton-n2470628) of that relevant detail, with which Trump could defend himself? At least the president wasn't alone in this respect; that same detail wasn't adequately disclosed (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2018/02/08/strassel-tweetstorm-grassley-memo-n2445871) to FISA judges either. This sort of reminds me of how told Trump in private, repeatedly (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/06/08/the-top-ten-moments-of-comeys-testimony-n2338366), that he wasn't under investigation -- but wouldn't say so publicly, driving Trump up a wall. It seems like James Comey managed to infuriate almost everyone over the course of his handling of the Clinton and Trump probes. But at least there was one man (https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/984559202692722689) who solemnly reaffirmed Comey's good intentions:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DanbXzjVQAAi2Gu.jpg

What explains the "bitchy" pre-tape speculation and hand size winks (http://www.businessinsider.com/comey-book-calls-trump-short-with-small-hands-2018-4)? Hey, Mr. Integrity (who has some fair reasons (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/05/19/wait-did-trump-really-brag-to-the-russians-that-firing-nut-job-comey-would-relieve-pressure-on-his-administration-n2329492) to despise Trump) has gotta sell books to an anti-Trump audience to whom he was once a villain somehow......snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...d-win-n2470638 (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2018/04/13/comey-i-made-a-critical-hillary-investigation-decision-because-i-thought-the-polls-showed-she-would-win-n2470638)



The Weasel.....weaseling. :smiley_ROFLMAO:

[MMC]

GOP Trumpf bootlickers makes perfect sense ...


http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1523591672/100_1580_joigfr.jpg
http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1523591577/100_1579_ibiggk.jpg

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BerV1up-ejs/V_ZWHnZbQoI/AAAAAAABA-U/9HBY1j_8bH0PS0igl38bI9Q13CUNfMrSQCLcB/s1600/weasels_2.jpg

[Grokmaster]

GOP Trumpf bootlickers makes perfect sense ...


http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1523591672/100_1580_joigfr.jpg
http://res.cloudinary.com/luvckye9s/image/upload/v1523591577/100_1579_ibiggk.jpg

23315

[Grokmaster]

So much for the Party of Law & Order/ Rule of Law .. oh how the party of Lincoln has devolved.



[/FONT][/COLOR]
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/why-the-gops-campaign-against-lyin-comey-makes-no-sense.html

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRN3Y9XUkAE6D3H.jpg[/FONT][/COLOR]
23316

[MMC]

23316

Comey Didn't Tell Trump the Infamous Dossier Was Financed By Hillary Clinton ......


In the fall of 2016 just before the presidential election, then FBI Director James Comey informed Republican candidate Donald Trump they had received "materials" alleging salacious misconduct by the business man. Comey warned the candidate the information could be used as blackmail.


Those "materials" Comey referred to was the now infamous and fake Russian dossier put together by British spy Christopher Steele. Steele was paid for the "opposition research" by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.


When Comey briefed Trump, he knew where the funding for the dossier came from but failed to disclose those facts at the time.



"Did you tell him that the Steele dossier had been financed by his political opponents?" ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos asked in an interview set to air this weekend.


"No. I didn’t," Comey responded.


"But did he have a right to know that?" Stephanopoulos followed up.


"That it had been financed by his political opponents? I don't know the answer to that," Comey said.


As a reminder, it wasn't publicly revealed until well into 2017, after Trump was elected, that the dossier was funded by Team Clinton. Further, Hillary Clinton herself denied multiple times (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/10/26/hillary-of-course-i-had-no-idea-we-paid-for-the-russia-dossier-n2400745) any involvement or connection (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/10/26/hillary-of-course-i-had-no-idea-we-paid-for-the-russia-dossier-n2400745) to the dossier. .....snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/04/13/comey-didnt-tell-trump-the-infamous-dossier-was-financed-by-hillary-clinton-n2470628


https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cNoZjQcwW5Y/WnXR_uK0zrI/AAAAAAAAI_c/XNEwqcUuAGQf3me6xs8S2r1lXELDV8e-wCLcBGAs/s640/Comey%2BWeasel.jpeg

[hanger4]

Comey Didn't Tell Trump the Infamous Dossier Was Financed By Hillary Clinton ...... In the fall of 2016 just before the presidential election, then FBI Director James Comey informed Republican candidate Donald Trump they had received "materials" alleging salacious misconduct by the business man. Comey warned the candidate the information could be used as blackmail.Those "materials" Comey referred to was the now infamous and fake Russian dossier put together by British spy Christopher Steele. Steele was paid for the "opposition research" by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. When Comey briefed Trump, he knew where the funding for the dossier came from but failed to disclose those facts at the time."Did you tell him that the Steele dossier had been financed by his political opponents?" ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos asked in an interview set to air this weekend."No. I didn’t," Comey responded. "But did he have a right to know that?" Stephanopoulos followed up."That it had been financed by his political opponents? I don't know the answer to that," Comey said.As a reminder, it wasn't publicly revealed until well into 2017, after Trump was elected, that the dossier was funded by Team Clinton. Further, Hillary Clinton herself denied multiple times (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/10/26/hillary-of-course-i-had-no-idea-we-paid-for-the-russia-dossier-n2400745) any involvement or connection (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/10/26/hillary-of-course-i-had-no-idea-we-paid-for-the-russia-dossier-n2400745) to the dossier. .....snip~https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/04/13/comey-didnt-tell-trump-the-infamous-dossier-was-financed-by-hillary-clinton-n2470628https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cNoZjQcwW5Y/WnXR_uK0zrI/AAAAAAAAI_c/XNEwqcUuAGQf3me6xs8S2r1lXELDV8e-wCLcBGAs/s640/Comey%2BWeasel.jpeg*"That it had been financed by his political opponents? I don't know the answer to that," Comey said.* ................ I surely don't know how that can't be construed as a lie by omission at the very least.

[Grokmaster]

*"That it had been financed by his political opponents? I don't know the answer to that," Comey said.* ................ I surely don't know how that can't be construed as a lie by omission at the very least.
And more proof of the FISA abuses perpetrated by the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ...including Comey.

[MMC]

*"That it had been financed by his political opponents? I don't know the answer to that," Comey said.* ................ I surely don't know how that can't be construed as a lie by omission at the very least.


Yeah I didn't say it was lie.....but it was an omission. Which I am sure there are more omissions.

[Grokmaster]

Yeah I didn't say it was lie.....but it was an omission. Which I am sure there are more omissions.

It was a lie BY OMISSION. That there are many more...you can bet the farm on that....

[Tahuyaman]

Thanks. I bookmarked it!

https://lyincomey.com/

Liberals were in full attack mode. They thought he was a dishonest partisan hack and a liar. Now they seem to be on he edge of their seat hoping he reveals something prevuiously unknown.

[Grokmaster]

23331

[Mini Me]

I must admit, this is conduct very unbecoming of an FBI director!

No free passes for Comey!

[Tahuyaman]

Please do provide us that list - and READ the story prior to comment.

Thanks


Why? You're a hack. You'll just deny it or insert a diversion.