This is the way to do it. XP was great, 7 is awesome now...Vista was best skipped. I'm not touching 8...maybe if I had a tablet or something but not on a regular PC. 7 does everything I need (not much - just don't crash :laugh:)and it's rock solid.
Printable View
I won't be upgrading soon. I just got a netbook and a desk top that run Windows 7. I am very happy with it. I will probably keep Windows 7 until I replace these machines. Years from now.
Vista was a disaster and 7 was basically warmed over Vista.
Microsoft is leading the backwards charge. Operating systems are no longer useful and productive, they're cumbersome and problematic.
I have no doubt 8 will be a complete clusterfuck.
Win8 has higher resource demand...
:huh:
Windows 8 demand higher than Win 7's, says Microsoft's Ballmer
29 Oct.`12 - Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has a rosy outlook for their new Windows 8 operating system, saying Monday that "we're seeing preliminary demand well above where we were with Windows 7." But other measures indicate that this statement may be somewhat misleading.
Quote:
Ballmer was speaking at a San Francisco event where Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 hardware were being showcased. Windows 8 itself officially launched last Friday, but has been available in preview form for more than a year. Comparing the new OS to its predecessor is natural, but could Windows 8, which has been intensely polarizing in the tech community, really be more in demand than the incredibly popular Windows 7, which famously fixed what Windows Vista had broken?
To find out, I spoke with Jay Chou, senior research analyst at IDC's Worldwide PC Tracker. While he cautioned that Ballmer may be privy to some statistics not yet publicized, Chou suggested that Windows 8 probably isn't going to move PCs the way Windows 7 did — but that this has as much to do with the broader PC market as it does with the desirability of the OS. "Our outlook on Windows 8 is that it will bring somewhat of a boost on the consumer side, but really, its full impact won't be felt till much later. We don't see it as a significant factor that will help the hardware business to recover."
He compared the circumstances of the release to those in 2009, when Windows 7 launched. At the time, millions of consumers and businesses were waiting eagerly for a chance to upgrade, having skipped the poorly received Windows Vista. Not only that, but netbooks were still selling at high rates, and Windows 7 was a great fit for that type of PC. Windows 7, in other words, arrived just when people wanted to buy into both new hardware and a new operating system.
Now, however, the economy has slowed PC shipments, tablets have replaced netbooks as the best option for casual computing, and for many people, the upgrade to Windows 7 is still fresh in their minds. Furthermore, Windows 8 isn't a cheap upgrade: "Cost is a factor," said Chou. "To really take advantage of Windows 8, you need the hardware, the touch capability. You might have to upgrade your mouse or get a multi-touch trackpad."
MORE
Right.
So we need more powerful computers to run these operating systems that are "more secure", until hackers figure away around the new security measures and start hacking it. Then they get upgraded with new security, which requires more resources, and when hackers figure the upgrade out...
All the while shit that used to be a breeze to do becomes increasingly impossible to do.
The golden age of computing is over.
So far I haven't seen any major problems like 7. Used it for about an hour today.
Well I am having to use it today and getting a headache. Playing on it was one thing but actually having to work on one, I can't find things. This one is suppose to be faster than my old one but I don't see it yet. He has pro on his. Mine was set up perfect and yes it was old but worked like a charm.