I don't really have an agenda here and I'm not a lawyer so I'm wasn't trying to mince words.
Simply put, If I'm reading the decision correctly, the court is saying that it's okay to post nudes of your ex lovers. My thoughts were not on the dude who posted the photos and his rights because people do things until they're told they can't. It's human nature.
I'm saying that I'm not surprised because it happened in a Texas court. The State doesn't seem to value women all that much, imo, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to the law.....I guess. But the law is also interpretation so if you're anti X it's easy to come up with an argument to support your position.
I also noted that the decision will result in a better law which I think you determined as well. Of course trying to figure out what a lawyer is saying can be dangerous. hahahaha