Russian Collusion Narrative Is Meant for Idiots

[Ethereal]

The democrats must have paid attention the last eight years to watch the masters at work.

Must have, because I cannot tell the difference between the birthers and the Russia obsessives.

[Crepitus]

There is nothing inconsistent about any of those statements. Democrats are just throwing as much shit as the wall as possible and hoping something sticks. Unfortunately for them, they have no solid evidence to back their position up.

You know, when you get right down to it "collusion isn't a crime" is a tacit admission of wrongdoing.

[MisterVeritis]

Timeline....
"Russia didn't interfere in our elections"
"Russia didn't collude with the Trump campaign"
"Collusion isn't illegal"

Wash, rinse, repeat.

Did you come up with this yourself?
Russia did not collude with the Trump Team.

But even if collusion did occur, is it illegal?

[resister]

Yea, the only thing that is defined is how partisan the "lock her up crowd" is....especially considering no $#@!s was given to how long that investigation went on for, or at what cost.

So how is that investigation going? lol

[Ethereal]

none of which has anything to do with collusion.

There is also no probable cause to support the existence of a specific offense with regards to any of those statutes. It's just a fishing expedition.

[MisterVeritis]

You know, when you get right down to it "collusion isn't a crime" is a tacit admission of wrongdoing.

No, dummy. It is a statement of fact.

[Crepitus]

No, dummy. It is a statement of fact.

No, it's an admission that it happened.

[MisterVeritis]

Yea, the only thing that is defined is how partisan the "lock her up crowd" is....especially considering no $#@!s was given to how long that investigation went on for, or at what cost.

Clinton committed actual crimes.

Lock her up.

[resister]

You know, when you get right down to it "collusion isn't a crime" is a tacit admission of wrongdoing.

State the relevant Statute. You don't need to be a lawyer to state a statute, thanks to google magic, I have stated statutes on TPF myself. Should be easier than supporting your position.

[Ethereal]

Yea, the only thing that is defined is how partisan the "lock her up crowd" is....especially considering no $#@!s was given to how long that investigation went on for, or at what cost.

As has been explained to you a dozen times already, the investigation into Hillary Clinton was based on FACTS.

It is a FACT that Hillary Clinton was the chief diplomat when a US ambassador was killed in Benghazi.

And it is a FACT that Hillary Clinton used a private email server to conduct official government business.

What FACTS do you have to support an investigation into Trump for "collusion" (which is not even a violation of any legal or fiduciary duty) with Russia?

I can see absolutely none.

All you can muster in support of this witchhunt are rumors, gossip, and speculation.