Democrats Have Become What They Say They Despise

[Safety]

Must be ironic. Where do you see a bunch of white nationalists?

Democrats are the racists.

Democrats since 1964 have been fighting for civil rights for blacks, while conservatives have been doing everything possible to prevent it. The Democrats have also elected the first black man to POTUS and conservatives lost their $#@! over it, even to the point that now they make up terms for news they don't like.

Nobody cares about a bunch of socially autistic conservative rejects that attempt to rewrite history by saying Democrats this or Democrats that, when it was not about party affiliation but ideology.

Yea, yea, we know how you hate whites.

It must be hard to attempt to function in society when you're that stupid, but you seem to keep trying...

[MisterVeritis]

Nothing is more ironic than watching a bunch of white nationalists pretend that the actions of their ideology in the past is somehow dismissed because of the party label it occurred under.

Newsflash...no matter how hard you stomp your feet or wave your arms, the conservative ideology will always be associated with white supremacy, slavery, Jim Crow, against SSM, not only because of historical proof and documents, but because that is who you are and what you stand for. The sad part is that nobody forced you to subscribe to that ideology, it is something you willfully chose, so there is no-one to blame but yourself.

You err. You often do.

[MMC]

Democrats since 1964 have been fighting for civil rights for blacks, while conservatives have been doing everything possible to prevent it. The Democrats have also elected the first black man to POTUS and conservatives lost their $#@! over it, even to the point that now they make up terms for news they don't like.

Nobody cares about a bunch of socially autistic conservative rejects that attempt to rewrite history by saying Democrats this or Democrats that, when it was not about party affiliation but ideology.



It must be hard to attempt to function in society when you're that stupid, but you seem to keep trying...

LMAO.


GoldwaterBarry Goldwater



Barry Morris Goldwater was an American politician, businessman, and author who was a five-term United States Senator from Arizona and the Republican Party's nominee for President of the United States in 1964. Despite his loss of the 1964 presidential election in a landslide, Goldwater is the politician most often …

en.wikipedia.org


was one of just six Senate Republicans to vote against the bill in 1964, while 21 Senate Democrats opposed it. It passed by an overall vote of 73-27. In the House, 96 Democrats and 34 Republicans voted against the Civil Rights Act, passing with an overall 290-130 vote.
Who’s Really Responsible for the Civil Rights Act? – TheBl…


www.theblaze.com/news/2014/04/10/whos-really-responsible-for-the-civil-rights-act


You really shouldn't talk about others being stupid.....not when you make Willy Lump Lump look like a Genius.

[MMC]

You err. You often do.

Most uneducated do have that problem.

[Hoosier8]

Democrats since 1964 have been fighting for civil rights for blacks, while conservatives have been doing everything possible to prevent it. The Democrats have also elected the first black man to POTUS and conservatives lost their $#@! over it, even to the point that now they make up terms for news they don't like.

Nobody cares about a bunch of socially autistic conservative rejects that attempt to rewrite history by saying Democrats this or Democrats that, when it was not about party affiliation but ideology.



It must be hard to attempt to function in society when you're that stupid, but you seem to keep trying...

LOL, most democrats couldn't find a lynching law they could pass until Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act that would not have been possible without Republicans. Democrats soon realized they could use blacks for votes so jumped on board though the racist dems stayed dems and use them they have by giving away free things and keeping them in figurative chains.

[Safety]

You err. You often do.

LMAO.


GoldwaterBarry Goldwater



Barry Morris Goldwater was an American politician, businessman, and author who was a five-term United States Senator from Arizona and the Republican Party's nominee for President of the United States in 1964. Despite his loss of the 1964 presidential election in a landslide, Goldwater is the politician most often …

en.wikipedia.org


was one of just six Senate Republicans to vote against the bill in 1964, while 21 Senate Democrats opposed it. It passed by an overall vote of 73-27. In the House, 96 Democrats and 34 Republicans voted against the Civil Rights Act, passing with an overall 290-130 vote.
Who’s Really Responsible for the Civil Rights Act? – TheBl…


www.theblaze.com/news/2014/04/10/whos-really-responsible-for-the-civil-rights-act


You really shouldn't talk about others being stupid.....not when you make Willy Lump Lump look like a Genius.

LOL, most democrats couldn't find a lynching law they could pass until Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act that would not have been possible without Republicans. Democrats soon realized they could use blacks for votes so jumped on board though the racist dems stayed dems and use them they have by giving away free things and keeping them in figurative chains.

Just like clockwork every couple of months I have to explain the same $#@! to hacks. Look at the votes cast by the house and Senate for the CRA, then juxtapose it by geographical area, one will find that the vote to pass the bill broke along the North/South ideologies. The north in both parties voted almost unanimously to pass the bill, while the south in both parties voted almost unanimously against the bill. When I get back to my computer I will post the vote breakdown. I wish you hacks would stop trying to whitewash history, because the conservative ideology has historically been the oppressor of anyone that was not a WASP. Just like today with Trump, yall will not end up on the right side of history. There will be a reckoning.

[barb012]

History says it was the Democrats that wanted blacks to be slaves.

[Hoosier8]

Just like clockwork every couple of months I have to explain the same $#@! to hacks. Look at the votes cast by the house and Senate for the CRA, then juxtapose it by geographical area, one will find that the vote to pass the bill broke along the North/South ideologies. The north in both parties voted almost unanimously to pass the bill, while the south in both parties voted almost unanimously against the bill. When I get back to my computer I will post the vote breakdown. I wish you hacks would stop trying to whitewash history, because the conservative ideology has historically been the oppressor of anyone that was not a WASP. Just like today with Trump, yall will not end up on the right side of history. There will be a reckoning.

And it was Johnson, that while in the Senate could never find an anti-lynching bill he could support, that signed it.

[MMC]

History says it was the Democrats that wanted blacks to be slaves.

Yeah and the Demos voting. Just like they did against women's Rights.

[Hoosier8]

Just like clockwork every couple of months I have to explain the same $#@! to hacks. Look at the votes cast by the house and Senate for the CRA, then juxtapose it by geographical area, one will find that the vote to pass the bill broke along the North/South ideologies. The north in both parties voted almost unanimously to pass the bill, while the south in both parties voted almost unanimously against the bill. When I get back to my computer I will post the vote breakdown. I wish you hacks would stop trying to whitewash history, because the conservative ideology has historically been the oppressor of anyone that was not a WASP. Just like today with Trump, yall will not end up on the right side of history. There will be a reckoning.

House Dem 63%
House Republican 80%

Senate Dem 69%
Senate Republicans 82%

A republican Everett Dirksen, led the fight to end the democrats filibuster.