Your three-step process in deciding how to respond to a given post of mine:
1) Decide in advance to disagree regardless of the content.
2) Read the post.
3) Explain why everything in it is wrong in the most needlessly aggressive and hostile fashion possible.
Something like that, right? Be honest.
Seeing as, as is typical of you, you are responding in less than good faith, I'll just respond to the one thing that I feel merits a reply, which is your second paragraph above: Why do you just assume I'm talking about restrooms specifically? I don't believe that trans-identified people are just natural born predators who are going around looking for women to rape. What I believe is that predatory men who consciously know they are men cynically take advantage of a lot of the policies that the transgender movement advocates for to find such opportunities.
To illustrate what I mean, let's take prison housing policies as an example. I think that many men who commit violent crimes, especially which involve preying on girls and/or women in some fashion, suddenly decide that they're "trans-women" after they're convicted and in prison so that they can be re-housed in a women's prison for obvious reasons. Then a rape happens, shockingly by that same individual, and people are somehow caught off guard and surprised. The UK, for example, used to have a policy of re-housing male prisoners who decide they're women in women's prisons until recently when, following on a series of resultant rapes, the authorities began to instead house trans-identified inmates in separate prisons. There is, in my mind, simply no way it was a coincidence that
48% of the trans-identified inmates in the nation's prisons were there, in part, for committing sex crimes. Only 3% of
actual female inmates in the UK had such convictions, and in fact only about 20% of the men had such convictions as well, so the fact that about half the trans-identified prisoners were sexual predators was a disproportionately high share for either sex. That makes no sense unless you remember that many of these trans identities were conveniently only 'discovered' by biologically male inmates
after their convictions. Now it makes sense! Now we can see that there is a cynical motive at play behind these sudden discoveries of many men that they are female.
Still think that groups like Fair Play for Women who pointed out this phenomenon had/have no legitimate concerns?