How the Army is getting its big guns back
The Army is moving away from counter-insurgency warfare and back to near-peer conflict. That included armor and artillery development. Currently, Russian artillery greatly out-ranges US artillery. Not a good place to be.
After nearly two decades of counterinsurgency warfare, the Army’s artillery and missiles — once the core of the modern Army’s way of land warfare — withered in quantity, quality and manpower.
During that decline, voices within the Army called for a shift in priorities, training and technology.
And while those calls were in some ways heeded, they also were, in other ways, ignored.
Until now.
Last year, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley established Cross Functional Teams centered around key Army priorities as the service prepares for near-peer threats such as China and Russia.
While they all play an important role in modernizing the Army, one that has emerged as a top priority, given current competitors and real-world readiness, is near and dear to the hearts of old soldiers: fires.