User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 'Forgotten' Supreme Court decision and its impact on our politics

  1. #1
    Points: 12,353, Level: 26
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 297
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Wehrwolfen's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    780
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    338
    Points
    12,353
    Level
    26
    Thanks Given
    444
    Thanked 364x in 195 Posts
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    'Forgotten' Supreme Court decision and its impact on our politics

    The 'Forgotten' Supreme Court decision and its impact on our politics
    The 'forgotten' Supreme Court decision and its impact on our politics | Fox News
    Amid the current national debate over immigration policies, racial discrimination, LGBTQ rights, and executive power, the anniversary of an important legal and political dispute that has directly shaped that debate will pass quietly, its legacy all but forgotten. In September 1958, sixty years ago next week, the United States Supreme Court finally earned its hard-fought reputation as a co-equal branch of the federal government, in a courtroom drama filled with urgency and uncertainty. For perhaps the first time, the high court put muscle behind its mandate, asserting in unequivocal terms that its interpretation of the Constitution was the "Supreme Law Of The Land," and ordering immediate state compliance.

    ~~~~~~
    Odd isn't it, how Democrat have changed, they hate the constitution and try to politicize it. they believe the Constitution is a living document and have been trying to subvert and destroy it in every move.
    I wonder what will happen when the USSC rules that States having passed Sanctuary City Laws are Unconstitutional let’s see what the lemmings do.
    If Cooper v. Aaron is 'Settled Law,' (a 'concept very near and dear to Progressive Democrats like Diane Feinstein et al.), then the idea of
    Sanctuary States and Cities are illegal
    , on their face. SCOTUS has decided immigration law in the decision against the state of Arizona's making their laws on illegals more supreme than federal law. So why aren't Jerry Brown, Andy Cuomo, Rahm Emanuel and all their co-lawbreakers being perp walked into a federal courthouse and indicted for violating FEDERAL law?
    Hmm...., Over fifty years later and this nation still suffers the consequences of Democrat LBJ and Congress's) Great Society program, and LBJs appointed Federal judges. Thus fifty plus years later Blacks now prefer and practice self-segregation and only recognize and celebrate Black History over desegregation and American History; so goes the battle. What they want, unless it otherwise offers great benefit and doesn't conflict with their tribal culture and ancestral propagation of hatred and no assimilation, is "Black separate but equal." In other words, they want to be plantation kept, never disciplined, and to own the plantation.
    If based upon settled law, SCOTUS being the law of the land...and in the words of Democrats, Immigration is a function of the Federal Government. How can State Governors and Mayors defy immigration laws? Trump needs to send in the National Guard, just as presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy did for School Segregation. Remember Governor Oravl Faubus, Bull Connors, and George Wallace.... Democrats All.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Wehrwolfen For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (09-10-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 138,403, Level: 89
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 1,047
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    58246
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    50,624
    Points
    138,403
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    104,286
    Thanked 29,267x in 20,296 Posts
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wehrwolfen View Post
    The 'Forgotten' Supreme Court decision and its impact on our politics
    The 'forgotten' Supreme Court decision and its impact on our politics | Fox News
    Amid the current national debate over immigration policies, racial discrimination, LGBTQ rights, and executive power, the anniversary of an important legal and political dispute that has directly shaped that debate will pass quietly, its legacy all but forgotten. In September 1958, sixty years ago next week, the United States Supreme Court finally earned its hard-fought reputation as a co-equal branch of the federal government, in a courtroom drama filled with urgency and uncertainty. For perhaps the first time, the high court put muscle behind its mandate, asserting in unequivocal terms that its interpretation of the Constitution was the "Supreme Law Of The Land," and ordering immediate state compliance.

    ~~~~~~
    Odd isn't it, how Democrat have changed, they hate the constitution and try to politicize it. they believe the Constitution is a living document and have been trying to subvert and destroy it in every move.
    I wonder what will happen when the USSC rules that States having passed Sanctuary City Laws are Unconstitutional let’s see what the lemmings do.
    If Cooper v. Aaron is 'Settled Law,' (a 'concept very near and dear to Progressive Democrats like Diane Feinstein et al.), then the idea of
    Sanctuary States and Cities are illegal
    , on their face. SCOTUS has decided immigration law in the decision against the state of Arizona's making their laws on illegals more supreme than federal law. So why aren't Jerry Brown, Andy Cuomo, Rahm Emanuel and all their co-lawbreakers being perp walked into a federal courthouse and indicted for violating FEDERAL law?
    Hmm...., Over fifty years later and this nation still suffers the consequences of Democrat LBJ and Congress's) Great Society program, and LBJs appointed Federal judges. Thus fifty plus years later Blacks now prefer and practice self-segregation and only recognize and celebrate Black History over desegregation and American History; so goes the battle. What they want, unless it otherwise offers great benefit and doesn't conflict with their tribal culture and ancestral propagation of hatred and no assimilation, is "Black separate but equal." In other words, they want to be plantation kept, never disciplined, and to own the plantation.
    If based upon settled law, SCOTUS being the law of the land...and in the words of Democrats, Immigration is a function of the Federal Government. How can State Governors and Mayors defy immigration laws? Trump needs to send in the National Guard, just as presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy did for School Segregation. Remember Governor Oravl Faubus, Bull Connors, and George Wallace.... Democrats All.
    Unless those states, CA, NY, etc. have created their own nation, they are indeed in violation of federal immigration laws.
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to stjames1_53 For This Useful Post:

    Wehrwolfen (09-10-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts