User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 6th Circuit rules Trump's call to eject rally protesters was protected by the 1St. A

  1. #1

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,337, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 65.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201353
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,439
    Points
    479,337
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,191
    Thanked 46,623x in 25,164 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Post 6th Circuit rules Trump's call to eject rally protesters was protected by the 1St. A

    6th Circuit rules Trump's call to eject rally protesters was protected by the First Amendment. A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that protesters cannot sue President Donald Trump and his presidential campaign for an alleged assault by audience members at a Louisville, Kentucky, rally following Trump’s command to “get ’em out of here.” The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump’s direction did not amount to the misdemeanor of “incitement to riot” under Kentucky law. In addition, the court said, Trump’s comments were protected by the First Amendment because he “did not specifically advocate imminent lawless action.”

    The National Law Journal, Politico and Reuters have coverage. The three plaintiffs had alleged they were assaulted, pushed and shoved at the March 2016 rally after Trump’s repeated call for their ouster. Besides Trump and the campaign, defendants included three people alleged to have carried out the assaults. The appeals court reversed a decision by U.S. District Judge David Hale of Louisville to allow the incitement to riot claim against the Trump defendants. The appeals court faulted Hale for a “decidedly thin” analysis of the claim of an incitement to riot, defined by Kentucky law as incitement to engage in tumultuous and violent conduct creating grave danger of personal injury or property damage.


    http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...n=weekly_email

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1LR22B

    Attachment 24319
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Common (09-12-2018),countryboy (09-12-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 43,841, Level: 51
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,409
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10224
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,729
    Points
    43,841
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,421
    Thanked 10,215x in 6,438 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  4. #3
    Points: 81,780, Level: 69
    Level completed: 73%, Points required for next Level: 670
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    countryboy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28570
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    28,998
    Points
    81,780
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    10,611
    Thanked 21,807x in 13,697 Posts
    Mentioned
    237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    6th Circuit rules Trump's call to eject rally protesters was protected by the First Amendment. A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that protesters cannot sue President Donald Trump and his presidential campaign for an alleged assault by audience members at a Louisville, Kentucky, rally following Trump’s command to “get ’em out of here.” The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump’s direction did not amount to the misdemeanor of “incitement to riot” under Kentucky law. In addition, the court said, Trump’s comments were protected by the First Amendment because he “did not specifically advocate imminent lawless action.”

    The National Law Journal, Politico and Reuters have coverage. The three plaintiffs had alleged they were assaulted, pushed and shoved at the March 2016 rally after Trump’s repeated call for their ouster. Besides Trump and the campaign, defendants included three people alleged to have carried out the assaults. The appeals court reversed a decision by U.S. District Judge David Hale of Louisville to allow the incitement to riot claim against the Trump defendants. The appeals court faulted Hale for a “decidedly thin” analysis of the claim of an incitement to riot, defined by Kentucky law as incitement to engage in tumultuous and violent conduct creating grave danger of personal injury or property damage.


    http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...n=weekly_email

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1LR22B

    Attachment 24319
    Frivolous lawsuit tossed out, good.
    Cutesy Time is OVER

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to countryboy For This Useful Post:

    Tahuyaman (09-12-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts