User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Gillibrand: I Never Meant Abolish ICE When I Said ‘Abolish ICE’

  1. #1
    Points: 46,926, Level: 52
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 124
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    37779
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    17,152
    Points
    46,926
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    30,009
    Thanked 8,795x in 6,359 Posts
    Mentioned
    67 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Gillibrand: I Never Meant Abolish ICE When I Said ‘Abolish ICE’

    Gillibrand: I Never Meant Abolish ICE When I Said ‘Abolish ICE’
    Molly Prince

    Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York stated Wednesday that her calls to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were misconstrued, claiming that despite saying “we need to abolish ICE,” she believes America still needs an agency that will fulfill the goals that ICE was created to achieve.
    Claiming that the agency has strayed from its intended duties, Gillibrand argued that ICE in its current form should be eliminated, but that a new agency should replace it that will execute the same mission of enforcing U.S. immigration laws and investigating criminal activity of foreign nationals residing within the country.
    “Give [ICE] a new name and a new directive,” Gillibrand told The Post-Star‘s editorial board.
    Gillibrand recommended that the government “reimagine” the agency, however, her office did not respond to requests from The Daily Caller News Foundation to clarify what her proposed agency would look like and how it would differ from ICE’s current form.

    The New York senator said that she does not support open borders, and she agrees with ICE’s mission, but claims President Donald Trump and his administration have ruined the reputation of the agency by cracking down on immigrants who illegally cross the border. (RELATED: Democrats Introduce Bill To Abolish ICE, GOP Fires Back)
    Nineteen ICE agents reportedly sent letters to Gillibrand complaining that their reputation has been tarnished, leading her to arrive at her policy stance.
    “Local law enforcement will not work with them,” Gillibrand said. “Local elected officials aren’t working with them.”
    Gillibrand received backlash in late June after saying multiple times that ICE needs to be abolished. Her comments came at a time when numerous other congressmen were advocating for the abolishment of the agency as well.


    House Democrats introduced a bill in early July to abolish ICE, but after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy announced he planned to bring the proposed bill to a vote, those same Democrats called it a “political stunt” and vowed to vote against their own proposal.

    Abolishing ICE is largely unpopular — only 25 percent of voters support the proposition, according to a July Politico and Morning Consult poll.

    http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/13/ki...d-abolish-ice/

    time to put his BS to rest. ICE is not going anywhere, any time soon...........
    Gillibrand is an idiot. Abolish ICE? She just wants to change the name thinking that it will change their function?
    I get it. They want the border patrol, regardless of their numbers to function solely at the border, while trying to take the teeth out of Customs and Immigration.
    A dem with a mixed message? Not so rare today.
    Ok, what do we call them once they've been absorbed back into Customs and Immigration? Will it change their function off-border?
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to stjames1_53 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (09-14-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 9,085, Level: 22
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 165
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsSocialTagger Second Class1 year registered
    Trish's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    6767
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,543
    Points
    9,085
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    1,486
    Thanked 1,898x in 1,155 Posts
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    She's an idiot and a prime example of what people hate about politicians.
    “I'm selfish, impatient and a little insecure. I make mistakes, I am out of control and at times hard to handle. But if you can't handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don't deserve me at my best.”
    Marilyn Monroe

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trish For This Useful Post:

    Cannons Front (09-14-2018),Captdon (09-14-2018),stjames1_53 (09-14-2018)

  5. #3
    Points: 95,769, Level: 75
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,581
    Overall activity: 46.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78142
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    32,065
    Points
    95,769
    Level
    75
    Thanks Given
    4,432
    Thanked 10,107x in 7,597 Posts
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by stjames1_53 View Post
    Gillibrand: I Never Meant Abolish ICE When I Said ‘Abolish ICE’
    Molly Prince

    Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York stated Wednesday that her calls to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were misconstrued, claiming that despite saying “we need to abolish ICE,” she believes America still needs an agency that will fulfill the goals that ICE was created to achieve.
    Claiming that the agency has strayed from its intended duties, Gillibrand argued that ICE in its current form should be eliminated, but that a new agency should replace it that will execute the same mission of enforcing U.S. immigration laws and investigating criminal activity of foreign nationals residing within the country.
    “Give [ICE] a new name and a new directive,” Gillibrand told The Post-Star‘s editorial board.
    Gillibrand recommended that the government “reimagine” the agency, however, her office did not respond to requests from The Daily Caller News Foundation to clarify what her proposed agency would look like and how it would differ from ICE’s current form.

    The New York senator said that she does not support open borders, and she agrees with ICE’s mission, but claims President Donald Trump and his administration have ruined the reputation of the agency by cracking down on immigrants who illegally cross the border. (RELATED: Democrats Introduce Bill To Abolish ICE, GOP Fires Back)
    Nineteen ICE agents reportedly sent letters to Gillibrand complaining that their reputation has been tarnished, leading her to arrive at her policy stance.
    “Local law enforcement will not work with them,” Gillibrand said. “Local elected officials aren’t working with them.”
    Gillibrand received backlash in late June after saying multiple times that ICE needs to be abolished. Her comments came at a time when numerous other congressmen were advocating for the abolishment of the agency as well.


    House Democrats introduced a bill in early July to abolish ICE, but after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy announced he planned to bring the proposed bill to a vote, those same Democrats called it a “political stunt” and vowed to vote against their own proposal.

    Abolishing ICE is largely unpopular — only 25 percent of voters support the proposition, according to a July Politico and Morning Consult poll.

    http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/13/ki...d-abolish-ice/

    time to put his BS to rest. ICE is not going anywhere, any time soon...........
    Gillibrand is an idiot. Abolish ICE? She just wants to change the name thinking that it will change their function?
    I get it. They want the border patrol, regardless of their numbers to function solely at the border, while trying to take the teeth out of Customs and Immigration.
    A dem with a mixed message? Not so rare today.
    Ok, what do we call them once they've been absorbed back into Customs and Immigration? Will it change their function off-border?
    Yes we do want them re-absorbed. Exactly what we need. Imagine federal inefficency x 3 reduced to one?

  6. #4
    Points: 4,645, Level: 16
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 505
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Jets's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    3561
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    539
    Points
    4,645
    Level
    16
    Thanks Given
    324
    Thanked 299x in 219 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I’m not a fan of either of my senators. It’s quite amusing when a politician uses the word. “abolish” and than equivocates by saying they didn’t mean abolish...
    Always agree to disagree.

    Always give the other poster the last word, whether correct or not.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Jets For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (09-14-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO