Why does Kavanaugh Accuser Dr Ford want an FBI Investigation if she is lying ?

[exotix]

Today



Notice how GOP Congress wants no FBI investigation ... especially (R) Grassley who may be implicated in Kavanaugh theft ...





Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before testifying


https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/polit...fbi/index.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/o...918-story.html

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...21.MaVIrf10vcI


A lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, said she will not testify in Congress before the FBI investigates the matter.


The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault says the FBI should investigate the incident before senators hold a hearing on the allegations.

In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and obtained by CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360," Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys argue that "a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."

The letter from Ford's lawyers notes that despite receiving a "stunning amount of support from her community," Ford has also "been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats" and has been forced to leave her home.

[Hoosier8]

Why wouldn't she? You can't call someone with a faulty memory a liar so it wouldn't matter if she made it up or not. You could never prove she made it up. You can never prove Kavanaugh was involved.

[MMC]

Today



Notice how GOP Congress wants no FBI investigation ... especially (R) Grassley who may be implicated in Kavanaugh theft ...





Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before testifying


https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/polit...fbi/index.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/o...918-story.html

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...21.MaVIrf10vcI


A lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, said she will not testify in Congress before the FBI investigates the matter.


The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault says the FBI should investigate the incident before senators hold a hearing on the allegations.

In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and obtained by CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360," Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys argue that "a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."

The letter from Ford's lawyers notes that despite receiving a "stunning amount of support from her community," Ford has also "been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats" and has been forced to leave her home.

Slayed 'Em: Here's Grassley Killing Democratic Hopes For An FBI Investigation Into Kavanaugh …...


Christmas has come early for Democrats. They’re going to Me Too Kavanaugh, score points with their liberal base, and whip up college-educated urban women in times for the 2018 midterms, right? The GOP will buckle under the pressure, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Jeff Flake, will break ranks. Flake being the most key since he’s the GOP’s winning vote on Judiciary. None of that is happening. The GOP is united. Flake said if Ford is a no-show for the hearing the committee is setting aside to deal with these allegation, postponing the original committee vote on the nomination, which was slated for today (Flake supported this), then he’s going to back his party’s push to get Kavanaugh through. It’s easy. Ford can’t remember who threw the party, why they were having the party, or how she got there. Three witnesses she identified said they have no recollection of the incident, nor are they sure there was even a party. It’s shoddy. It’s thin. It’s unprovable. It has a long shelf life, but the GOP sees right through this. Democrats want an FBI investigation. Why? There’s no federal crime. As Ed noted over at Hot Air, at most, this is an attempted aggravated assault charge, a state charge whose statute of limitations has long expired. The FBI even said this is a political issue, not one relating to law enforcement; they’re steering clear. And here’s where Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Senate Judiciary Committee chair, delivers the deathblow to this absurd pivot from the Left. They can’t force an executive branch entity to conduct a politically motived investigation and bypassing their constitutionally prescribed duty because Democrats don’t like someone.


From Grassley’s office [emphasis mine]:.....snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...n-int-n2520645

[Cletus]

She doesn't want an FBI investigation.

Her lawyer knew before she even asked for one that the FBI would not investigate because it is not within their jurisdiction. By asking for one, she gets stupid people to ask "Why would she want an FBI investigation if she is lying".

[Ransom]

She doesn't want an FBI investigation.

Her lawyer knew before she even asked for one that the FBI would not investigate because it is not within their jurisdiction. By asking for one, she gets stupid people to ask "Why would she want an FBI investigation if she is lying".

Now, that's quality stuff right there. It answers the question and identifies who is asking it. Thumbs up, Cletus.

[exotix]

LOL


#WhoOwnsKavanaugh

https://twitter.com/hashtag/WhoOwnsKavanaugh?src=hash

[Jeb!]

She doesn't want an FBI investigation, her legal team is using the absence of an FBI investigation as an excuse to not appear in Congress, knowing there is never going to be an FBI investigation.

[exotix]

She doesn't want an FBI investigation, her legal team is using the absence of an FBI investigation as an excuse to not appear in Congress, knowing there is never going to be an FBI investigation.

Then how come Mike Davis, the chief counsel on nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee under Chairman Chuck Grassley .. tweeted then deleted his tweets ?


https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...13.r5J8kMFsark


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ts/1366391002/



WASHINGTON – Mike Davis, the chief counsel on nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee under Chairman Chuck Grassley, is being criticized for two tweets he posted and then deleted that called into question his objectivity regarding the sexual assault allegation that has been made against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"Unfazed and determined.
We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh. #ConfirmKavanaugh," read screengrabs of a deleted tweet sent from Davis' account at 10:22 p.m. EDT on Wednesday.

About two hours later, Davis sent another tweet reading, "I personally questioned Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony and 5 years imprisonment, if he lies. I'm waiting to hear back from the accuser's attorneys, who can't find time between TV appearances to get back to me."

Those tweets sparked an uproar as some Twitter users interpreted them as evidence that Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, will not be given a fair hearing if she accepts Grassley's invitation to testify about her accusation before the committee on Monday.

[exotix]

LOL







*She’s widely published in journals of psychology
She teaches clinical psyc at palo alto university
What i’m trying to say is that this is the last thing that she needs
But she’s doing it for her country
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford

This boy held her down when she was just 15
Tried to tear off her clothes and covered her mouth so no one could hear her scream
Is that a youthful indiscretion befitting of a judge supreme
$#@! you Says
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford

Oh why didn’t she report it
As soon as she left the party
She knew no one’d believe her
She knew how it would be
The more things changeThey stay the same
In this god damn country
Now it’s 30 years later And Brock Turner is walking free

This had to be the hardest choice that she’ll ever make
She’s gone into hiding, she’s under siege every day
She knew the consequences she did it anyway
But she’s doing it for her country
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford

I hope someday soon she’ll get back to psychology
Designing statistical models for research at the university
No matter how things turn out, she’ll go down in history
As a warrior for truth
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford *

[Jeb!]

Then how come Mike Davis, the chief counsel on nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee under Chairman Chuck Grassley .. tweeted then deleted his tweets ?


https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...13.r5J8kMFsark


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ts/1366391002/



WASHINGTON – Mike Davis, the chief counsel on nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee under Chairman Chuck Grassley, is being criticized for two tweets he posted and then deleted that called into question his objectivity regarding the sexual assault allegation that has been made against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"Unfazed and determined.
We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh. #ConfirmKavanaugh," read screengrabs of a deleted tweet sent from Davis' account at 10:22 p.m. EDT on Wednesday.

About two hours later, Davis sent another tweet reading, "I personally questioned Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony and 5 years imprisonment, if he lies. I'm waiting to hear back from the accuser's attorneys, who can't find time between TV appearances to get back to me."

Those tweets sparked an uproar as some Twitter users interpreted them as evidence that Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, will not be given a fair hearing if she accepts Grassley's invitation to testify about her accusation before the committee on Monday.

He made the "unfazed" tweet because he's 90% sure his accuser won't show up, deleted it because Ford's attorney can still change her mind at the last minute. I will believe Ford myself if she testifies to Congress. Right now I do not because she is ducking Congress to push Kavanaugh's vote past the midterms.

If deleting posts is evidence means anything, then one must ask Christine King Miranda deleted her Twitter account.