Kavanaugh accuser Dr. Christine Ford lays out conditions for Congressional testimony

[Private Pickle]

It's only a claim from 6 years ago when she suddenly remembered it so vividly that she doesn't know where or when it happened.

Hey!!! Too many facts in that statement! Disregarded cause "sexual assault"!

[Hoosier8]

It's clear. I got it. The problem is the differences between the claims. Who exactly is claiming Trump did anything at this point? Mueller wants a deposition for an investigation. He isn't claiming Trump did anything. The Democrats are of course because well they still haven't used enough Preparation H from the blasting they received in the POTUS election but as we well know Mueller hasn't accused Trump of anything and why? Because he can't. If he could he would.

Prosecutors are supposed to prosecute crimes. There is no predicate crime to prosecute; thus, the witch hunt.

[Private Pickle]

Prosecutors are supposed to prosecute crimes. There is no predicate crime to prosecute; thus, the witch hunt.

Which is why they want Trump to testify. Enter that pesky 5th Amendment and all. Prosecutors and police maneuver to alienate you from your rights. The police state we have in place enables this behavior.

So many SJW's scream against the police state while applauding their actions. It's even funnier when you say it out loud.

[MMC]

Hmmm. Kinda like POTUS' refusal to meet with Mueller?

Trump isn't accusing Mueller of anything and as it stands Mueller hasn't accused Trump of anything. So no not kinda like.

[pjohns]

Admittedly, this is from a conservative source (The Conservative Tribune)--so it is very difficult to claim neutrality here--but it is, I think, very telling; especially if one does not wish merely to shoot the messenger: https://www.teaparty.org/3rd-person-...-apart-325082/

[Common Sense]

Trump isn't accusing Mueller of anything and as it stands Mueller hasn't accused Trump of anything. So no not kinda like.

Well, Trump has essentially claimed that Mueller is heading up a witch hunt.

[ripmeister]

It's only a claim from 6 years ago when she suddenly remembered it so vividly that she doesn't know where or when it happened.

Ok. That's a matter specific to this situation. I was addressing the general statement put forth by MMC.

[MMC]

Admittedly, this is from a conservative source (The Conservative Tribune)--so it is very difficult to claim neutrality here--but it is, I think, very telling; especially if one does not wish merely to shoot the messenger: https://www.teaparty.org/3rd-person-...-apart-325082/

3 people deny what she says, and now she has no witnesses.



One of those four people, Patrick J. Smyth, a high school classmate of Kavanaugh, provided the Senate Judiciary Committee with a letter rebutting Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh, according to CNS News.

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth said in his statement published by CNN.

Smyth went on to claim “no knowledge” of the party Ford described.

“I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

Smyth also commented on Kavanaugh’s character and his treatment of women.

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women,” Smyth said.

Smyth’s statement makes him the third person to deny Ford’s claims out of the four individuals Ford said were present at the party.

Kavanaugh was the first person to deny Ford’s claims.

“This is a completely false allegation,” Kavanaugh said in a statement on Monday.

“I have never done anything like what the accuser describes — to her or to anyone,” Kavanaugh continued, “Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday.”

Ford’s story seems to be in shambles with three out of four alleged witnesses have said the assault never happened.

westernjournal.com/ct/3rd-person-room-kavanaugh-attack-comes-forward-blows-story-apart/

[ripmeister]

It's clear. I got it. The problem is the differences between the claims. Who exactly is claiming Trump did anything at this point? Mueller wants a deposition for an investigation. He isn't claiming Trump did anything. The Democrats are of course because well they still haven't used enough Preparation H from the blasting they received in the POTUS election but as we well know Mueller hasn't accused Trump of anything and why? Because he can't. If he could he would.

Well perhaps I've misunderstood the position of POTUS' lawyers. My recollection is that they don't want POTUS to be interviewed for fear that he'll incriminate himself or get caught in a perjury trap. In other words the same issue that MMC raised in terms of Kavanaughs accuser.

[stjames1_53]

Well, Trump has essentially claimed that Mueller is heading up a witch hunt.

he is. There is no there there................what is he investigating now?