She's a danger to American Justice

[gamewell45]

Is Dr. Ford a grown woman or a 15 year old drunk girl?
The way the left is treating her you’d think the latter. They, (the left), would also have you think the 15 year old girl was still being raped by Judge Kavanaugh even though nothing but some sexual groping between two drunk teenagers is the actual unproven and denied allegation.


GOLLY GEE! Nobody ever did any of that before when they were teenagers did they? No good teenagers ever have a desire to get drunk, or have sexual desires, interest or experiments do they?

I think Dr. Ford is either a mentally disturbed confused and guilt ridden middle aged woman, or she’s a left-wing partisan garbage collector hell bent on keeping a Republican selected judge off of the Supreme Court. Either way she’s a danger to American justice.

Were you ever sexually assaulted as a child? If not, how can you relate to her angst if in fact it occurred? I cannot prejudge her because I never went through what she did.

That being said, this is why we have the mechanism in place to resolve issues such as this which may come up in society. It's a fair and balanced system that has served our country well IMO. Whether I think Kavanaugh is guilty or not or whether Ford is right or wrong is inmaterial; that's for the legal system to decide.

[Robo]

Were you ever sexually assaulted as a child? If not, how can you relate to her angst if in fact it occurred? I cannot prejudge her because I never went through what she did.

That being said, this is why we have the mechanism in place to resolve issues such as this which may come up in society. It's a fair and balanced system that has served our country well IMO. Whether I think Kavanaugh is guilty or not or whether Ford is right or wrong is inmaterial; that's for the legal system to decide.

Well then surely you're about to articulate exactly how that fair and balanced justice system works and why you're now demanding it be implemented in the final days of the vote for a Supreme Court Judge, right? Doesn't it seem just a little bit shady that Senate Democrats waited to this last minute to present this alleged crime against the judge after every other circus act they pulled off at the Senate hearings failed to stop this judge? Does that create just a smidgen of suspicion in your honest unbiased mind? Can you tell us why Democrats refuse to allow the Republican Senators and "we the people" to see the original letter from the alleged victim to Senator Feinstein?

[Tahuyaman]

If it WAS a conservative woman accusing a liberal Supreme Court nominee, a LOT of attitudes would be different, T. Maybe yours...?

I need evidence no matter who’s being accused.

However, conservative usually oppose someone based on their views on the issues. They generally don’t pull last minute dirty tricks.

[Standing Wolf]

I need evidence no matter who’s being accused.

However, conservative usually oppose someone based on their views on the issues. They generally don’t pull last minute dirty tricks.

Merrick Garland.

[Tahuyaman]

Merrick Garland.

You just made my point. He was opposed based on his liberal views. How did they try to use a last minute character assasination tactic against him? No one tried to smear him.

No one tried to destroy his life.

[Sergeant Gleed]

I think it's clear - and entirely fair to say - that the negative reaction to Dr. Ford and her accusations, along with the attempts to twist what happened into something it was not - holding a young girl down and covering her mouth to keep her from screaming is an "experiment"? - is about one part macho posturing and nine parts partisan dumf*ckery. As I wrote elsewhere, the telling of this story is obviously inconvenient for a lot of people, but that should not be anyone's primary consideration.

Got any evidence that the event happened?

Since you do not, why are you treating it as proven?


Establishing the story's veracity is the primary consideration.

[Captdon]

Your post is such an ignorant diatribe on people that have been sexually assaulted. You've no idea what you're talking about dude. She's just one of millions that have had to go through that trauma, and thus far all approaches say that she's being truthful and there are a miriad of reasons why victims don't talk about it for years afterward.

Your kind of thinking is shameful man; just shameful.

How do you know she went through this? Talk about shameful. You have Kavanaugh guilty without a shred of evidence. Shameful.

[Sergeant Gleed]

He said she said coming from a left wing activist. Progressives think they are saving America and will do anything to attain their goal.

No.

The Rodents think they are losing power and if this confirmation happens, they will be right.

So they're pulling every dirty dishonest disgusting trick they can, smearing a good man to keep power, just as they did with Clarence Thomas and are doing with President Trump.

[Sergeant Gleed]

If it WAS a conservative woman accusing a liberal Supreme Court nominee, a LOT of attitudes would be different, T. Maybe yours...?

No.

Americans require EVIDENCE.

Rodents jump for the cheese, no matter how rotten.

[Standing Wolf]

You just made my point. He was opposed based on his liberal views. How did they try to use a last minute character assasination tactic against him? No one tried to smear him.

He was opposed because President Obama nominated him. He was never formally "opposed based on his liberal views" by anyone because the Republicans refused to convene confirmation hearings on Judge Garland. If that wasn't a "dirty trick", there isn't any such thing.