She's a danger to American Justice

[Robo]

Is Dr. Ford a grown woman or a 15 year old drunk girl?
The way the left is treating her you’d think the latter. They, (the left), would also have you think the 15 year old girl was still being raped by Judge Kavanaugh even though nothing but some sexual groping between two drunk teenagers is the actual unproven and denied allegation.


GOLLY GEE! Nobody ever did any of that before when they were teenagers did they? No good teenagers ever have a desire to get drunk, or have sexual desires, interest or experiments do they?

I think Dr. Ford is either a mentally disturbed confused and guilt ridden middle aged woman, or she’s a left-wing partisan garbage collector hell bent on keeping a Republican selected judge off of the Supreme Court. Either way she’s a danger to American justice.

[jet57]

Your post is such an ignorant diatribe on people that have been sexually assaulted. You've no idea what you're talking about dude. She's just one of millions that have had to go through that trauma, and thus far all approaches say that she's being truthful and there are a miriad of reasons why victims don't talk about it for years afterward.

Your kind of thinking is shameful man; just shameful.

[Standing Wolf]

I think it's clear - and entirely fair to say - that the negative reaction to Dr. Ford and her accusations, along with the attempts to twist what happened into something it was not - holding a young girl down and covering her mouth to keep her from screaming is an "experiment"? - is about one part macho posturing and nine parts partisan dumf*ckery. As I wrote elsewhere, the telling of this story is obviously inconvenient for a lot of people, but that should not be anyone's primary consideration.

Some may ask, "What if the nominee were a liberal and the President who nominated him a Democrat? Would there be liberals and Democrats making the same allegations of fraud and re-victimizing the accuser?" The answer, of course, is Yes, there probably would be, because politics contaminates and ruins almost everything. And that is the real "danger to American justice".

[Robo]

holding a young girl down and covering her mouth to keep her from screaming is an "experiment"? -

No, believing a drunk 15 year old girl after 37 years is the "EXPERIMENT" in the extent of corruption of American justice. Just exactly how much culpability are the "sugar & spice & everything nice" females of the world entitled to avoid before we males grow our gonads and say enough of this garbage is enough?

[Hoosier8]

Your post is such an ignorant diatribe on people that have been sexually assaulted. You've no idea what you're talking about dude. She's just one of millions that have had to go through that trauma, and thus far all approaches say that she's being truthful and there are a miriad of reasons why victims don't talk about it for years afterward.

Your kind of thinking is shameful man; just shameful.

It was a diatribe on the political hit against Kavanaugh. Quit trying to equate this with Clinton raping woman as an adult.

[Hoosier8]

I think it's clear - and entirely fair to say - that the negative reaction to Dr. Ford and her accusations, along with the attempts to twist what happened into something it was not - holding a young girl down and covering her mouth to keep her from screaming is an "experiment"? - is about one part macho posturing and nine parts partisan dumf*ckery. As I wrote elsewhere, the telling of this story is obviously inconvenient for a lot of people, but that should not be anyone's primary consideration.

Some may ask, "What if the nominee were a liberal and the President who nominated him a Democrat? Would there be liberals and Democrats making the same allegations of fraud and re-victimizing the accuser?" The answer, of course, is Yes, there probably would be, because politics contaminates and ruins almost everything. And that is the real "danger to American justice".

He said she said coming from a left wing activist. Progressives think they are saving America and will do anything to attain their goal.

[Tahuyaman]

Your post is such an ignorant diatribe on people that have been sexually assaulted. You've no idea what you're talking about dude. She's just one of millions that have had to go through that trauma, and thus far all approaches say that she's being truthful and there are a miriad of reasons why victims don't talk about it for years afterward.

Your kind of thinking is shameful man; just shameful.

There’s no evidence to support her accusation other than her word. The people she said witnessed the event say that they witnessed no such event.

If it was a conservative woman accusing a liberal, you’d have a different take on this.

[Standing Wolf]

If it was a conservative woman accusing a liberal, you’d have a different take on this.

If it WAS a conservative woman accusing a liberal Supreme Court nominee, a LOT of attitudes would be different, T. Maybe yours...?

[Cletus]

Liberal or Conservative... such an allegation needs to be supported by evidence. To date, every person she has claimed was there to witness it denies any such incident occurred. There is no physical evidence. Without even a date or location, there can be no circumstantial evidence.

I think this is nothing more than a political hit job. Based on the known facts, there really is no other reasonable conclusion, except maybe mental illness.

[Robo]

If it WAS a conservative woman accusing a liberal Supreme Court nominee, a LOT of attitudes would be different, T. Maybe yours...?

There should be absolutely no difference how justice is handed out based on a political bias. Every person accused should have the right to face his/her accuser and testify or not testify on his/her own behalf and only be convicted based on "evidence" delivered to a jury of his/her peers who can reach a unanimous decision of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

So, explain how that could ever be realized in this case. Any and every sane and honest person knows this is a leftist hit job, in my opinion.