Second woman alleges sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, this time in college

[The Xl]

There is going to be no proof, as it's hearsay from 30-40 years ago.

[Tahuyaman]

No, it won't this time. The committee is voting on Friday. The Senate will be voting next week. The Dems failed.

I’m going to stay with my prediction that the Republicans turn their back on him.

[Tahuyaman]

My grip is fine. I was referring to the politicization, not the possible character assassination.

when did anyone invent an accusation agsinst Garland. The Republican majority simply never scheduled a hearing. No personal attacks. No character assasination.

You are showing your hack side.

[Hal Jordan]

Investigate. If there is reasonable doubt, there it is. Investigate all such accusations, but remember reasonable doubt.

Speaking to sector 2814 via the ring.

[stjames1_53]

Investigate. If there is reasonable doubt, there it is. Investigate all such accusations, but remember reasonable doubt.

Speaking to sector 2814 via the ring.

this is a local jurisdiction issue......... investigate away. ahem......where did it happen?

[countryboy]

this is a local jurisdiction issue......... investigate away. ahem......where did it happen?

Right there's your reasonable doubt. Case dismissed! Lol

[Hoosier8]

Dems DO NOT want Ford to testify.

[Cannons Front]

Investigate. If there is reasonable doubt, there it is. Investigate all such accusations, but remember reasonable doubt.
Speaking to sector 2814 via the ring.

Ford has claimed Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed and tried to remove her clothes when they were teenagers at a house party in Maryland, although she has said she is unable to recall who owned the house or why there was a gathering there. According to Ford, who says she eventually escaped to a bathroom, Kavanaugh covered her mouth briefly as loud music blared.

Ford told The Washington Post last week that there were a total of "four boys at the party" where the alleged episode occurred, and that two -- Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge -- had been in the room during her attack. She said that her therapist had made an error by indicating she had told him in 2012 that all four boys had been involved in attacking her.


Those boys purportedly included Kavanaugh, Judge, and another classmate, Patrick Smyth -- All of whom have since denied to the Senate Judiciary Committee, under penalty of felony, any knowledge of the particular party in question, as well as any misconduct by Kavanaugh.


However, a woman, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, has since been identified by Ford as the fourth witness at the party. In a dramatic twist, Keyser, who has never been describable as a "boy," emerged Saturday night to say she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.

See Highlighted parts

How much more reasonable doubt do you need, She has no idea when it happened or where it happened. She has her story of 4 boys or 2 boys....... and one of the boys Ford now names as a girl. EVERYONE who was named says the event never happened, and to top it off the girl says she dosen't even know Kavanaugh.

If that is not reasonable doubt what is?

[MMC]

Dems DO NOT want Ford to testify.

Ford is Waffling already and it started Monday.


Backpedaling? Ford's Lawyer Sends a Letter to Grassley With Grave Concerns.....


One of the attorneys for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Judge Brett Kavanaugh's first sexual assault accuser, sent a letter late Monday night to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley expressing concerns about the format of Thursday's hearings.

In his letter, attorney Michael Bromwich expressed concern over an experienced sex crimes prosecutor coming in to help with the hearings. More than anything, Bromwich immediately demanded a copy of the prosecutor's resume after arguing that there is no need for him or her to be present. His argument: neither Ford nor Kavanaugh are on trial.

Bromwich also said Ford's team is not convinced that she will receive a "fair and credible" process because Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said Ford's accusations are a "smear campaign" put together by the Democrats as a means of keeping Kavanaugh from being confirmed.

Here's a copy of the letter:

You said in your letter that intend to provide a "fair and credible" process that provides Dr. Blasey Ford "fair and respectful" treatment. Yet earlier today the Majority Leader dismissed Dr. Ford's experience as a "smear campaign," claiming mistakenly that the witnesses' to the Committee constitute "a complete lack of evidence," implying that there has been a thorough investigation. This and statements he has made previously are flatly inconsistent with your letter.

In our view, the hiring of an unnamed "experienced sex crimes prosecutor," as Mr. Davis described in his email, is contrary to the Majority's repeated emphasis on the need for the Senate and this Committee's members to fulfill their constitutional obligations. It is also inconsistent with your stated wish to avoid a "circus," as well as Dr. Blasey Ford's repeated requests through counsel that senators conducted the questioning. This is not a criminal trial for which the involvement of an experienced sex crimes prosecutor would be appropriate. Neither Dr. Blasey Ford nor Judge Kavanaugh is on trial. The goal should be to develop relevant facts, not try a case.

The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.

Please identify this person and ask your staff to send us her resume immediately. We respectfully request to meet with her tomorrow. We are available for a call with the Majority and Minority staff to discuss the remaining questions anytime......snip~

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethb...tter-to-grassley-with-grave-concerns-n2522252



Ahahahahahaha…..now Ford and her attorneys are trembling to testify. The Committee brought in a Sex Crimes Attorney to question Ford. Her attorneys and Ford are panicking. Now they want the Resume of this attorney and are available for calls from Grassley and Feinstein. Got them so scared they even went tangential about McConnell and what he has said. Notice they didn't say anything about what Chucky Cheese Schumer has been saying.


She might back out for sure now. Which if she does and tells Grassley she isn't testifying. Then Grassley should call for an immediate vote tomorrow or Thursday morning. Then the full Senate Friday.

[ripmeister]

when did anyone invent an accusation agsinst Garland. The Republican majority simply never scheduled a hearing. No personal attacks. No character assasination.

You are showing your hack side.

I didn't say they did. You need to read more carefully.