User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New maths theories; Ampere's circuital law.

  1. #1
    Points: 14,853, Level: 29
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 597
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Brett Nortje's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    200
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Cape Town South Africa
    Posts
    2,083
    Points
    14,853
    Level
    29
    Thanks Given
    284
    Thanked 181x in 165 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    New maths theories; Ampere's circuital law.

    Okay, I now feel the urge to come up with new equations to allow young children to do the most complex of college formulas. Let's begin with some... Let's tack the topic at hand, to see mathematical formula are not hard to understand, okay?





    Scary, hey? Let's see if we can find a pattern for the two, and, then find a way to do maths regarding these two for the kids, so they can prepare for college, to see if they like this sort fo thing?

    [A] This would be positive [c] minus [c] = [0]. Then, positive [s] minus [s] = [0]. Four symbols eliminated so far. Then, this centre equation of the first joules [J] * [d] = [B]. That is the answer of the first one, [energy] or [joules] times by [distance].

    [B] For this second one, seeing as how we found the middle of the first so easy, would be to multiply the first answer by [f], of course.

    As you can see, anyone in grade eight might be able to do this easier than they teach algebra, yes? It would also excite them more, to find these things so easy to do, as I find them to teach, of course.
    !! Thug LIfe !!

  2. #2
    Points: 14,853, Level: 29
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 597
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Brett Nortje's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    200
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Cape Town South Africa
    Posts
    2,083
    Points
    14,853
    Level
    29
    Thanks Given
    284
    Thanked 181x in 165 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bernoulli's principle.



    With this we are trying to find [H], yes? This will be a case of not merely eliminating symbols, but something more challenging, of course.

    So, [z] + [z / 4 * 5], of course.

    This is because the one side of the quadratic equation has one symbols divided by two and the second has four symbols divided three, yes? Naturally, this means there could also be [0.5] + [2], yes?

    This means it comes down to, as they are all added, one [1p] / [1p] * [1g], so, either it is [1] or it is [half], yes? Then, the second is easy.

    Either the answer is [3z] or [2.5z].
    !! Thug LIfe !!

  3. #3
    Points: 2,799, Level: 12
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 251
    Overall activity: 38.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial1000 Experience Points3 months registered
    Lummy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    632
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    1,388
    Points
    2,799
    Level
    12
    Thanks Given
    333
    Thanked 622x in 444 Posts
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Your problem, Probius, is complex:

    1 there are no children here;
    2 if there were any children here, they might rather want to kick your ass than go to college (it's free in jail anyway);
    3 you do not state what key this is in. Do you even know?
    None are so blind as who will not see. -- Jeremiah 5:21

  4. #4
    Points: 96,813, Level: 75
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 537
    Overall activity: 62.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78314
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    32,453
    Points
    96,813
    Level
    75
    Thanks Given
    4,538
    Thanked 10,279x in 7,729 Posts
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Brett Nortje View Post
    Okay, I now feel the urge to come up with new equations to allow young children to do the most complex of college formulas. Let's begin with some... Let's tack the topic at hand, to see mathematical formula are not hard to understand, okay?





    Scary, hey? Let's see if we can find a pattern for the two, and, then find a way to do maths regarding these two for the kids, so they can prepare for college, to see if they like this sort fo thing?

    [A] This would be positive [c] minus [c] = [0]. Then, positive [s] minus [s] = [0]. Four symbols eliminated so far. Then, this centre equation of the first joules [J] * [d] = [B]. That is the answer of the first one, [energy] or [joules] times by [distance].

    [B] For this second one, seeing as how we found the middle of the first so easy, would be to multiply the first answer by [f], of course.

    As you can see, anyone in grade eight might be able to do this easier than they teach algebra, yes? It would also excite them more, to find these things so easy to do, as I find them to teach, of course.

    Ummm, I think you are asking for a lot. Young children are currently being taught MORE COMPLEX ways to do simple math!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO