Why is this woman still teaching at Georgetown U (or anywhere else)?

[Lummy]

Carol Christine Fair, who serves as an associate professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies, said in the aftermath of the most recent Brett Kavanaugh hearings on Capitol Hill that white Republican senators — and specifically, white Republican senators named Lindsey Graham who went out on the political limb to fiercely defend Kavanaugh — ought to die “miserable deaths ...”

That’s not all.

Fair put out this: “Look at [this] chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ssor-who-want/

Holy cow$#@!, you say? What does she teach, you ask?

She received a PhD from the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilization at the University of Chicago in 2004, and is presently is a "Provost's Distinguished Associate Professor in the Peace and Security Studies Program (SSP) within Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service. She is currently an associate professor in the Security Studies Program within the Edmund A.Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Her work is primarily focused on counter-terrorism and South Asian topics." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Christine_Fair

Holy cow$#@!.

You already said that.

This smells like Clintons and Obama, perhaps with some McCain thrown in. Use your imagination.

[Captdon]

Liberals get a free pass.

[stjames1_53]

It's becoming boring............a fresh batch of idiots a day singing woes and begones about losing not only the election, but now they're lamenting the loss of Garland.
REVENGE upon any who dare to polish that seat unless it is a socialist who doesn't know how to spell "Constitution"

[Helena]

She's still teaching because Georgetown has consistently backed her up. This isn't her first dust-up.

[CCitizen]

Fair put out this: “Look at [this] chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ssor-who-want/

Sadly Progressives get away with countless threats of violence.

As I have said, "If any man shared his true thoughts about misandrists, he would be banned from all forums, all Social Media, and investigated by FBI." I was attacked for my words.

[ripmeister]

Unfortunately the bar for public discourse is at an all time low.

[Standing Wolf]

On the one hand, no reasonable person would support such violent rhetoric.

On the other hand, any number of posts on this very forum over the years have called for "all liberals" to be rounded up and executed in various ways. Just for being "liberals".

Yes, I understand that the one doesn't excuse the other - so anyone who was poised to pipe up to accuse me of something in Latin, stand down.

My point is simply to ask: Why is the one sentiment so abhorrent to the same people who ignore or even cheer the other? I mean, this woman made her feelings known publicly...whereas the members of this forum who like to fantasize about dealing a violent end to all "liberals and progressives" do so with complete anonymity. So as unbalanced and devoid of good sense as she may be, you've got to give her credit for having more balls than people who are only prepared to express such sentiments on an anonymous message board.

[silvereyes]

On the one hand, no reasonable person would support such violent rhetoric.

On the other hand, any number of posts on this very forum over the years have called for "all liberals" to be rounded up and executed in various ways. Just for being "liberals".

Yes, I understand that the one doesn't excuse the other - so anyone who was poised to pipe up to accuse me of something in Latin, stand down.

My point is simply to ask: Why is the one sentiment so abhorrent to the same people who ignore or even cheer the other? I mean, this woman made her feelings known publicly...whereas the members of this forum who like to fantasize about dealing a violent end to all "liberals and progressives" do so with complete anonymity. So as unbalanced and devoid of good sense as she may be, you've got to give her credit for having more balls than people who are only prepared to express such sentiments on an anonymous message board.

Lol. So true.

[Lummy]

Georgetown University is an awful expensive bin for storing rags.

... So as unbalanced and devoid of good sense as she may be, you've got to give her credit for having more balls than people who are only prepared to express such sentiments on an anonymous message board.

Not really.

There are things one might say in a bar or on the street that one would never say in a classroom, and in this case, there is a load of $#@! said in a classroom that no doubt shouldn't be said at all. She can go to hell if she wants; that's her prerogative. But she shouldn't be dragging young minds with her. They can't take her crap with them when they leave and do anything positive with it.

In my opinion, she makes fodder -- munitions for the elite, the poor suckers. Georgetown U is certainly aware of this, of course, and so she does represent their vision. Evergreen College in in the deep woods of Washington where Sasquatch roams or Oberlin College in Deep Space would be better suited for her. LOL

[stjames1_53]

On the one hand, no reasonable person would support such violent rhetoric.

On the other hand, any number of posts on this very forum over the years have called for "all liberals" to be rounded up and executed in various ways. Just for being "liberals".

Yes, I understand that the one doesn't excuse the other - so anyone who was poised to pipe up to accuse me of something in Latin, stand down.

My point is simply to ask: Why is the one sentiment so abhorrent to the same people who ignore or even cheer the other? I mean, this woman made her feelings known publicly...whereas the members of this forum who like to fantasize about dealing a violent end to all "liberals and progressives" do so with complete anonymity. So as unbalanced and devoid of good sense as she may be, you've got to give her credit for having more balls than people who are only prepared to express such sentiments on an anonymous message board.

feelings are irrelevant to the law. It takes proof of some kind. Feelings are used upon enacting sentencing
When she "knew" 6 years ago, why did she not go to the Montgomery county sheriff's office since there is no statute of limitations for the alleged crime?
Nope, this was all carefully crafted by the democrats so they could publically do a scorched earth on him and his family.