The Record Number of Women Running This Year

[Lummy]

For anything. Including sex.

[Captain Obvious]

lol @ this thread

That people identify with race, gender, religion or whatever with politics but will claim bias, bigotry, misogyny kind of baffles me.

That someone is "qualified" based on what's between (or not between) their legs first, actual qualifications being secondary is equally baffling to me.

And me, the white guy has an inherent bigotry just for being a white guy.

Carry on.

[Dr. Who]

would you agree segregation is exclusive?

knowing it was the democrats that gave us the jim crow laws forcing segregation, and that now the left argues, in fact has, segregated whites/blacks in campuses nationwide do you agree with the ones calling/pushing for segregation today and think, perhaps we should return to the democrats jim crow days?

America's New Racial Segregationists Are On The Left - The Federalist


thefederalist.com/2017/05/23/americas-new-racial-segregationists-are-on-the-left/


May 23, 2017 - For the Left to keep its investment in race alive, it must mortgage everyone to the ... In fact, there are so many examples of racially segregated dances, student housing ... Didn't AmericansWant Racial Segregation to End?


Leftists Are Now Advocating Racial Segregation - The New American


https://www.thenewamerican.com/.../3...racial-segrega...


Sep 10, 2018 - There are far more egregious examples of the new segregation, too. ... none of this is surprising given the moral relativism that defines the Left.




Under Trump, Liberals Rediscover School Segregation


prospect.org/article/under-trump-liberals-rediscover-school-segregation


Aug 11, 2017 - But it was Weingarten's remarks about choice and segregation that ultimately ... liberal think tank have apparently found some common ground. ... required transferring educators into schools they didn't want to work in. ... represent yet another example of teachers' lack of agency over their professional lives.

I do wish people would stop equating Dixiecrat politics with the Democratic party platform, particularly post CRA. Like it or not, it's the Democrats who opted to really drive inclusivity in America since the 1960's. The GOP was historically the party of business and the wealthy. As a result they were less likely to pander to the openly racist agenda of the 'lower classes' but neither did they champion civil rights. What changed, post CRA, is that the alienated Dixiecrats who were all about representing the paranoic racist imaginings of white rural southern voters, along with their desire to eliminate economic competition from a significant black population, ended up looking for a new home and ultimately found it in the GOP.

That doesn't mean that the Dems didn't have a large contingent of Blue Dog Democrats, often union members, who were also interested in eliminating competition from the blacks who fled to the industrial northeast for a chance at a better life. It was all fine until America started facing greater competition in the market for the goods she produced and industry started moving offshore to gain an economic edge. Then whites were suddenly competing with black workers for the same jobs and we all know who lost that competition because unions were allowed to legally discriminate. It was much like what happened to female industrial workers when the boys came home from the war. In the context of the rapid disemployment of blacks in the northeast and the war in Vietnam which disproportionately drafted the poor (which included most blacks) and who returned to an America that didn't want to know their name, a massive civil rights crisis arose and it was the Democrats under Kennedy that turned the corner and Johnson who ended up carrying the ball (if for all the wrong reasons). From that point on, the Dems not the Reps represented the diverse common man in America.

As to the people promoting segregation, they are the same types who are actively destroying the education system in America. They are not leftists in particular, they are opportunists looking for a paycheck. No one seems to care about imposing untried theories on hapless children. Black kids who come from disadvantaged circumstances don't need separate schools, they need support in the form of meals if they are not eating properly and people to help them with their homework if there is no one at home who can help them. They need not to be ignored in class by teachers who tend to teach to the best students and ignore the students who are struggling. Schools, on the other hand, need to take a hard line on racist behavior which is just another aspect of bullying and simply kick out those who will not comply. That's their parent's problem and usually the source of the problem.

[Safety]

I do wish people would stop equating Dixiecrat politics with the Democratic party platform, particularly post CRA. Like it or not, it's the Democrats who opted to really drive inclusivity in America since the 1960's. The GOP was historically the party of business and the wealthy. As a result they were less likely to pander to the openly racist agenda of the 'lower classes' but neither did they champion civil rights. What changed, post CRA, is that the alienated Dixiecrats who were all about representing the paranoic racist imaginings of white rural southern voters, along with their desire to eliminate economic competition from a significant black population, ended up looking for a new home and ultimately found it in the GOP.

That doesn't mean that the Dems didn't have a large contingent of Blue Dog Democrats, often union members, who were also interested in eliminating competition from the blacks who fled to the industrial northeast for a chance at a better life. It was all fine until America started facing greater competition in the market for the goods she produced and industry started moving offshore to gain an economic edge. Then whites were suddenly competing with black workers for the same jobs and we all know who lost that competition because unions were allowed to legally discriminate. It was much like what happened to female industrial workers when the boys came home from the war. In the context of the rapid disemployment of blacks in the northeast and the war in Vietnam which disproportionately drafted the poor (which included most blacks) and who returned to an America that didn't want to know their name, a massive civil rights crisis arose and it was the Democrats under Kennedy that turned the corner and Johnson who ended up carrying the ball (if for all the wrong reasons). From that point on, the Dems not the Reps represented the diverse common man in America.

As to the people promoting segregation, they are the same types who are actively destroying the education system in America. They are not leftists in particular, they are opportunists looking for a paycheck. No one seems to care about imposing untried theories on hapless children. Black kids who come from disadvantaged circumstances don't need separate schools, they need support in the form of meals if they are not eating properly and people to help them with their homework if there is no one at home who can help them. They need not to be ignored in class by teachers who tend to teach to the best students and ignore the students who are struggling. Schools, on the other hand, need to take a hard line on racist behavior which is just another aspect of bullying and simply kick out those who will not comply. That's their parent's problem and usually the source of the problem.

Willfully conflating democrats with dixiecrats are the only argument someone from the right ideology can make, in order to attempt to obfuscate the discussion about the history of the parties. If someone was able to use a time machine and have a conversation with MLK Jr., and they told him that liberals were the ideology of the KKK and that conservatives were the ideology that was fighting for civil rights, he would laugh in their face.

[Captdon]

Nothing in your failed attachments says anything about ideology. Only how racist the history of Democrats are.


Guess how persuasive you are going to be calling your audience ignorant.




A great man, just listen to his message.

Toober is getting to Safety. He's been here more since Toober arrived than he was before he got here.

[Safety]

Toober is getting to Safety. He's been here more since Toober arrived than he was before he got here.

"I know people there".

[Chris]

Willfully conflating democrats with dixiecrats are the only argument someone from the right ideology can make, in order to attempt to obfuscate the discussion about the history of the parties. If someone was able to use a time machine and have a conversation with MLK Jr., and they told him that liberals were the ideology of the KKK and that conservatives were the ideology that was fighting for civil rights, he would laugh in their face.

You're no MLK, safety. Please don't pretend to speak for him.

[Safety]

You're no MLK, safety. Please don't pretend to speak for him.

Chris, pound sand.

[Chris]

Chris, pound sand.

Where's the beach?

[Orion Rules]

Willfully conflating democrats with dixiecrats are the only argument someone from the right ideology can make, in order to attempt to obfuscate the discussion about the history of the parties. If someone was able to use a time machine and have a conversation with MLK Jr., and they told him that liberals were the ideology of the KKK and that conservatives were the ideology that was fighting for civil rights, he would laugh in their face.

Safety, civil rights is for white people, too, and the Klan has a right to exist on its face. Mr. King had his day to stir the trouble up, to make sure that civil rights passed, to make America free. But is America freer in a multicultural tower of babel where no one knows what their rights are? Or the few, and the many do, but the others don't know where.

The military men and women, and the others also, in terms of, 'fight free to save your country', they are the first ones who deserve. The constant demands for more from the liberty libraries, of the constant motion(s) means more immigrants from 'no place worthy to be from, because we won't stand up to make ourselves free'.