Sure Obama's the worst President ever, for Blacks, but Clarence Thomas is the worst h

[Raffishragabash]

Human being, ever, for Blacks who try to be free.

Lets look at more examples, of Clarence 'Uncle' Thomas anti-Black mindset, which Obama could never stoop to:

https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/06/04/...ng-right-side/


Clarence Thomas Manages to Be Wrong Even When He’s on the Right Side

Jun 4, 2018, 5:58pm


by Imani Gandy


Justice Thomas' concurring opinion in Collins v. Virginia makes clear that he is living in a fantasy of his own creation—not the reality where Black people are routinely stripped of their Fourth Amendment rights.

If Thomas thinks that the right of “self-help” exists across the board in this country, then he has a deep misunderstanding of policing in the 21st century.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


In an 8-1 decision last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Collins v. Virginia, which strengthens what relatively anemic Fourth Amendment rights we still have left. Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the majority opinion, ruling that the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s search warrant requirement does not extend to a vehicle on the “curtilage” of a person’s home. (“Curtilage” is a fancy—and rather unpleasant sounding—word that describes the area of land immediately surrounding a house, including closely associated buildings or structures like woodsheds and garages.) In other words, if a vehicle is in that region, the police can’t enter it without a warrant.


Collins is an important decision that curtails the further chipping away of our Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. Justice Samuel Alito was the only justice to rule in the minority. Even Justice Clarence Thomas got onboard—but his concurring opinion makes clear that he would actually roll those rights back further if he could.

Generally, the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain a search warrant before they can search you or search through your $#@!. If the cops violate your Fourth Amendment rights, then any evidence obtained as a result of those violations may be suppressed or excluded in criminal court. This is known as the exclusionary rule...

[Captain Obvious]

Did Clarence get a free phone?

[Tahuyaman]

Human being, ever, for Blacks who try to be free.

Lets look at more examples, of Clarence 'Uncle' Thomas anti-Black mindset, which Obama could never stoop to:

Again?

[Raffishragabash]

Check out this fleecing of Equality re Educational Affirmative Action in 2013. This is sickening:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...rmative-action



...Thomas argued a very basic premise: The government should consider race only when there is a "pressing public necessity."


In Thomas' view, that means the state can only consider race "to provide a bulwark against anarchy, or to prevent violence."



Affirmative action, he argued, hardly meets those standards.



What's more, he said, just as the court decided that discrimination was unconstitutional when the country set up "separate-but-equal" schools, it should also conclude that it is wrong when universities include race in their admissions decisions...

[Captain Obvious]

Check out this fleecing of Equality. This is sickening:


[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]

He must have texted that in from his free O'bama phone.

I'm sure of that, just look at the font.

[Tahuyaman]

...Thomas argued a very basic premise: The government should consider race only when there is a "pressing public necessity." In Thomas' view, that means the state can only consider race "to provide a bulwark against anarchy, or to prevent violence."Affirmative action, he argued, hardly meets those standards. What's more, he said, just as the court decided that discrimination was unconstitutional when the country set up "separate-but-equal" schools, it should also conclude that it is wrong when universities include race in their admissions decisions...

OK. What's the problem with that?

[Raffishragabash]

Again?

Please contribute to the topic, or else post proofs which you feel invalidate the topic.

[Raffishragabash]

the problem with that?

The Eternal Legacy Of Slavery is always a "pressing public necessity" when you love Black people and hate the racism which subjugates them. Always. It does not take a day off, thereby Affirmative Action should not take a day off either.

Even White Supremacist Ann Coulter understood that fact much, much better than Uncle Thomas.

[Tahuyaman]

The Eternal Legacy Of Slavery is always a "pressing public necessity" when you love Black people and hate the racism which subjugates them. Always. It does not take a day off, thereby Affirmative Action should not take a day off either.

Even White Supremacist Ann Coulter understood that fact much, much better than Uncle Thomas.

How did you connect opposing affirmative action to an "eternal legacy of slavery"?


Now, maybe you could try to explain specifically how Thomas' position is flawed?

[roadmaster]

It depends on how far left you are. Obama lifted the ban on contagious diseases and HIV and then allowed the immigrant society to flood African American cities with ones in Africa during the worst HIV crises. Obama told black men and others they had no right to shield their daughters from men coming into showers or bathrooms. So I see it is he put them in danger both ways. It depends on what your priorities are.