Eager to slam Trump, Schumer contradicts himself in support of Chief Justice Roberts,

[Wehrwolfen]

Eager to slam Trump, Schumer contradicts himself in support of Chief Justice Roberts, critics say

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sch...es-justice-rob

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was quickly mocked Friday after praising Chief Justice John Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court for rebuking President Trump’s recent “Obama judges” comment -- while at the same time slamming Roberts’ “partisan decisions.”
“I don’t agree very often with Chief Justice Roberts, especially his partisan decisions which seem highly political on Citizens United, Janus, and Shelby,” the Democrat wrote in a Twitter message. “But I am thankful today that he — almost alone among Republicans — stood up to President Trump and for an independent judiciary.”
Critics on social media and elsewhere pointed out that in issuing a two-sided response to the Trump-Roberts exchange, Schumer was effectively agreeing with the president, who had criticized the courts for partisanship.



~~~~~~
Chuckie and his fellow Democrats don’t care what he or they say as long as their adoring biased media repeat and print it so their base thinks they are actually doing something. It doesn’t have to make any kind of sense. Schumer's statement is a clear contradiction and fully supports the Presidents statement regarding judicial bias. Anyone but a partisan hack would acknowledge that. If you take time to review the videos from Chuckie, Pelosi, Hillary, Obama and many of the Dem's, going back to the late 90's and early 2000s, they were all for a border wall and deporting illegal aliens, but Democrats don’t flip flop, they “evolve”. Remember that immediatedly after Obama was elected the border wall project was killed.
For those who have short memories, Roberts saved Obama’s Obamacare by declaring it a tax. Oddly enough, Democrats including Chuckie swore it was not a tax.

[Crepitus]

Lmao!

Roberts taking the unprecedented step of publicly calling tRump on his bull$#@! really rattled you kids didn't it.

Gonna hafta look further than Schumer to distract everyone though.

[Hoosier8]

Lmao!

Roberts taking the unprecedented step of publicly calling tRump on his bull$#@! really rattled you kids didn't it.

Gonna hafta look further than Schumer to distract everyone though.

Democrat hypocrisy must be something you approve of.

[hanger4]

Lmao! Roberts taking the unprecedented step of publicly calling tRump on his bull$#@! really rattled you kids didn't it.Gonna hafta look further than Schumer to distract everyone though.

Schumer admits Roberts is a partisan and makes partisan decisions then he praises Roberts for telling Trump that they dont. ............. ^^ Hat tip to @Common .............. http://thepoliticalforums.com/thread...artisan-Judges

[MMC]

In the Case of Trump vs. Roberts, the President Prevails.....


ho gets it right, President Donald Trump or Chief Justice John Roberts? The president earlier this week attacked “Obama judges,” whom he believes are erroneously interpreting the law and the Constitution to frustrate his administration’s policy initiatives. The chief justice told the Associated Press on Wednesday there is no such partisan thing. All federal judges, Roberts explained, essentially are noble public servants striving selflessly to apply a neutral rule of law.


The president, of course, is correct—though we can wish that the chief justice were, too.



But it is the president, not the chief justice, who is most faithful to our tradition in this case.



We are at an extraordinary period in history when one of our political parties, the Democrats, has become committed to a jurisprudential theory at odds with our tradition, while the other, the Republicans, exemplified by the president, and, oddly enough, the chief justice (most of the time, anyway) still embodies that original understanding.


Somehow, however, others (including the president) recognize that many judges appointed by Democrats, when they engage in legislating new rules, are betraying our constitutional scheme, where lawmaking is supposed to be for the legislature, not for the judiciary. For judges to make law, to depart from precedent and from original understanding—in other words, to ignore the strictures of the Constitution and our statutes—is to deprive us of self-government. Paradoxically, then, for these appointees of Democratic presidents to frustrate the acts of the president, is to betray the very democracy they claim to represent.



The president probably also understands that he owes his election to a feeling on the part of much of the American electorate that for too long social policy has been formulated and implemented not by the people’s representatives, but by judges.


Indeed, the president and the Federalist Society probably both grasp that the current deep divisions in the country have been caused partly by a federal judiciary and a federal leviathan exercising power that, to paraphrase the 10th Amendment, properly belongs to the states and to the American people themselves.


Sadly, it will fall to Roberts’s court ultimately to administer the needed rebuke to the errant judges whom the president has properly excoriated......snip~


https://amgreatness.com/2018/11/23/i...dent-prevails/



Trump was Right, and the Lame Stream Media validates that every time they speak about a Judge being appointed by a President.

[Tahuyaman]

Lmao!

Roberts taking the unprecedented step of publicly calling tRump on his bull$#@! really rattled you kids didn't it.

Gonna hafta look further than Schumer to distract everyone though.

What’s new? Schumer has been sprinting to every TV camera he can find slamming everything Trump since Election Day 2016.

[Crepitus]

Democrat hypocrisy must be something you approve of.

Nope, that's not gonna do it either.

[hanger4]

Nope, that's not gonna do it either.

Schumer's double standards are self evident.

[Hoosier8]

Nope, that's not gonna do it either.

Does it for you.