User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Rule 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Points: 42,371, Level: 50
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,179
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    181627
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    18,700
    Points
    42,371
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    21
    Thanked 13,312x in 8,289 Posts
    Mentioned
    194 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rule 10

    Rule 10. Threads marked tPF allow the thread creator to thread ban members for what they feel are violations of any of the above listed forum rules, and only for those reasons.

    Has anybody read this rule other than me? Is this a rule or isn't it?
    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (12-03-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 68,921, Level: 64
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 2,029
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    41755
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    25,047
    Points
    68,921
    Level
    64
    Thanks Given
    44,495
    Thanked 12,773x in 9,303 Posts
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    Rule 10. Threads marked tPF allow the thread creator to thread ban members for what they feel are violations of any of the above listed forum rules, and only for those reasons.

    Has anybody read this rule other than me? Is this a rule or isn't it?
    I think it as intended to control the flow of discussion. For example, I use it for keeping it from turning a good conversation into a melee where anyone says anything they want to say, even if it's outside of the subject matter. If I post a tP F thread, I want to keep it from derailment and personal attacks. It's kind of like playing the telephone game. By the time a thread is done, it has absolutely nothing to do with the OP. Some members like to take a thread and turn in to something all about them. That's why I use it, but seldom call upon moderation to step in. I have, and will continue to do so, IF I post a tPF thread.
    I know that sometimes threads indicating tPF are short lived, but hey, this is a forum
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to stjames1_53 For This Useful Post:

    nathanbforrest45 (12-03-2018)

  5. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 543,809, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    429552
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    162,650
    Points
    543,809
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    95,997
    Thanked 80,532x in 54,331 Posts
    Mentioned
    2242 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    Rule 10. Threads marked tPF allow the thread creator to thread ban members for what they feel are violations of any of the above listed forum rules, and only for those reasons.

    Has anybody read this rule other than me? Is this a rule or isn't it?
    I read it. I was a mod when it was added. Yes, it is a rule.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  6. #4
    Points: 466,059, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 72.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    397792
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    150,820
    Points
    466,059
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    15,687
    Thanked 45,367x in 33,367 Posts
    Mentioned
    1725 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Yes, it's a rule. Instead of a team of mods deciding a post/poster has violated a rule, the OP decides. Mods can override, that is, there must be a rule violation.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  7. #5
    Points: 42,371, Level: 50
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,179
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    181627
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    18,700
    Points
    42,371
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    21
    Thanked 13,312x in 8,289 Posts
    Mentioned
    194 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Yes, it's a rule. Instead of a team of mods deciding a post/poster has violated a rule, the OP decides. Mods can override, that is, there must be a rule violation.
    Yet...
    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

  8. #6
    Points: 466,059, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 72.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    397792
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    150,820
    Points
    466,059
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    15,687
    Thanked 45,367x in 33,367 Posts
    Mentioned
    1725 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    Yet...
    The rule was written to avoid trivial TBs. I shouldn't be able to TB you from my tPF thread simply because I don't like you or your post. I need to state the rule violated and explain. OTOH, it avoids the time and consensus of mods TBs normally take.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (12-03-2018)

  10. #7
    Points: 42,371, Level: 50
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,179
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    181627
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    18,700
    Points
    42,371
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    21
    Thanked 13,312x in 8,289 Posts
    Mentioned
    194 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    The rule was written to avoid trivial TBs. I shouldn't be able to TB you from my tPF thread simply because I don't like you or your post. I need to state the rule violated and explain. OTOH, it avoids the time and consensus of mods TBs normally take.
    Well, that isn't what is happening. The reality is that any clown who starts a tPF thread can effectively ban anyone he wants from it for any reason or no reason. We just saw an example of that.

    Either Rule 10 is a rule or it isn't a rule. If that rule can just be ignored, I don't see any reason why all the others shouldn't be optional, as well.

    Here is an easy fix. ENFORCE the rule and if a thread ban is required, have the mods cite the specific rule violation in their ban post.
    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (12-03-2018),ODB (12-03-2018)

  12. #8
    Points: 466,059, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 72.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    397792
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    150,820
    Points
    466,059
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    15,687
    Thanked 45,367x in 33,367 Posts
    Mentioned
    1725 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    Well, that isn't what is happening. The reality is that any clown who starts a tPF thread can effectively ban anyone he wants from it for any reason or no reason. We just saw an example of that.

    Either Rule 10 is a rule or it isn't a rule. If that rule can just be ignored, I don't see any reason why all the others shouldn't be optional, as well.

    Here is an easy fix. ENFORCE the rule and if a thread ban is required, have the mods cite the specific rule violation in their ban post.

    OK, well, I would suggest sending a PM to a mod and explaining the situation--you and any others who see this issue. That's the way to handle it, via PM or reports when you get TBed. If enough raise the issue, they will likely scrutinize tPF TB requests more carefully.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  13. #9

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 344,815, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    332572
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    59,811
    Points
    344,815
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,938
    Thanked 11,774x in 7,377 Posts
    Mentioned
    303 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    Well, that isn't what is happening. The reality is that any clown who starts a tPF thread can effectively ban anyone he wants from it for any reason or no reason. We just saw an example of that.

    Either Rule 10 is a rule or it isn't a rule. If that rule can just be ignored, I don't see any reason why all the others shouldn't be optional, as well.

    Here is an easy fix. ENFORCE the rule and if a thread ban is required, have the mods cite the specific rule violation in their ban post.
    It was determined by a mod that it was off topic trolling
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  14. #10
    Points: 141,829, Level: 90
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 1,221
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ethereal's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    456151
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    48,532
    Points
    141,829
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    9,407
    Thanked 28,875x in 18,346 Posts
    Mentioned
    990 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cletus starting another cry baby thread. So what else is new?
    Two things awe me most, the starry sky above me and the moral law within me.
    --Immanuel Kant

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO