User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 4567891011 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 107

Thread: Should all law enforcement carry Narcan

  1. #71
    Points: 166,441, Level: 97
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 3,209
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    258005
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton Washington or Sayulita Mexico depending on the time of year.
    Posts
    73,638
    Points
    166,441
    Level
    97
    Thanks Given
    8,486
    Thanked 26,969x in 20,280 Posts
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    There is a bit of a difference between trying to help someone who was not engaging in particularly risky activity who finds himself in a bad way and trying to save someone who deliberately pumped his system full of poison.
    People can turn their life around after being saved from a near death experience.

  2. #72

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 279,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.3%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    326233
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    49,348
    Points
    279,240
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    2,248
    Thanked 5,435x in 3,364 Posts
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I dont care what a person is dieing from or how they are dieing, its a cops job to do their best to prevent it, until professional medical personell arrive.

    Cops DO NOT judge who's life is worthy to save and who's is not because they dont like their behavior
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  3. #73
    Original Ranter
    Points: 473,732, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    414910
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    144,357
    Points
    473,732
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    83,137
    Thanked 65,883x in 44,997 Posts
    Mentioned
    2159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gamewell45 View Post
    Using your rationale, we shouldn't cut people out of cars who were in accidents due to inattention, cell phone usage, intoxication, etc after all let them accept the consequences of their actions. And as you said, "the taxpayers should not have to pay for it".
    The police don't cut people out of cars. EMS or firefighters do, I believe.
    Alea iacta est

    Check out the blog.


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Common (12-06-2018)

  5. #74
    Points: 97,547, Level: 76
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 2,403
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    283388
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    47,187
    Points
    97,547
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    33,803
    Thanked 14,749x in 11,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    I dont care what a person is dieing from or how they are dieing, its a cops job to do their best to prevent it, until professional medical personell arrive.

    Cops DO NOT judge who's life is worthy to save and who's is not because they dont like their behavior
    It is one thing to perform first aid. It is another to compel taxpayers to buy massive amounts of antidotes for overdosing drug addicts. My solution is for each community to decide. If a community wants it then let the community buy narcan for their police officers to carry as a separate item from tax expenditures.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  6. #75

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 279,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.3%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    326233
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    49,348
    Points
    279,240
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    2,248
    Thanked 5,435x in 3,364 Posts
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    The police don't cut people out of cars. EMS or firefighters do, I believe.
    Fire rescue, cops do use jaws when they have too
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  7. #76

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 279,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.3%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    326233
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    49,348
    Points
    279,240
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    2,248
    Thanked 5,435x in 3,364 Posts
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    It is one thing to perform first aid. It is another to compel taxpayers to buy massive amounts of antidotes for overdosing drug addicts. My solution is for each community to decide. If a community wants it then let the community buy narcan for their police officers to carry as a separate item from tax expenditures.
    No where did I say for taxpayers to pay massive amounts for anything, I posted this to get others opinion.

    Now pay attention the cost is no different if a cop uses narcan or not, and Im not saying they SHOULD.

    Either the cop, the ent or the emergency room uses it, there is no additional cost factor in the adminstration of narcan. Medically the sooner its administered the great the chance of saving a life.
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  8. #77
    Points: 99,432, Level: 76
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 518
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78621
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    33,423
    Points
    99,432
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    4,772
    Thanked 10,586x in 7,966 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    I see drug overdoses the same way I see a self inflicted gunshot wound. If they want to do that to themselves, let them accept the consequences.

    No one should be required or feel an obligation to save them, and the taxpayers certainly should not have to pay for it.

    Apples and oranges. The drug OD would be less likely if the product were legal and the purity known

  9. #78
    Points: 99,432, Level: 76
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 518
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78621
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    33,423
    Points
    99,432
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    4,772
    Thanked 10,586x in 7,966 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    Why?
    In order to protect and serve and save lives which is their mission. That's why.

  10. #79
    Points: 99,432, Level: 76
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 518
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78621
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    33,423
    Points
    99,432
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    4,772
    Thanked 10,586x in 7,966 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    It is one thing to perform first aid. It is another to compel taxpayers to buy massive amounts of antidotes for overdosing drug addicts. My solution is for each community to decide. If a community wants it then let the community buy narcan for their police officers to carry as a separate item from tax expenditures.
    There's that social compassion again. Ban the drug. Then not provide readily available care when the drug ban has life threatening consequences.

  11. #80
    Points: 33,751, Level: 44
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 199
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    177995
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    15,078
    Points
    33,751
    Level
    44
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 9,676x in 6,226 Posts
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    In order to protect and serve and save lives which is their mission. That's why.
    Yeah, except that is not their mission, regardless of what stupid little logos they may have on their cars.

    Their job is to enforce the law... end/stop. The Supreme Court has ruled on two separate occasions that police have no legal obligation to rescue you, save you, or do anything other than arrest you if you commit a crime.

    Besides, how would they be serving the public better... saving some junkie from an OD so he can OD again later on, or by letting nature take its course?
    Gentlemen and ladies, I hate inflation, I hate taxes, and I hate Communism. Do something about it. Ronald Reagan's instructions to his first assembled Cabinet.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    ODB (12-06-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO