User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 101 to 107 of 107

Thread: Should all law enforcement carry Narcan

  1. #101
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496566
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,576x in 94,412 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    His idea actually isn't a bad one if you look at in a military context.

    Every soldier should carry at least a pressure bandage as part of his basic kit. If he is wounded, whoever responds to him will use the wounded man's own bandage on him. You could do the same with junkies. Tell them if they are carrying Narcan, the first responder will use it on them. If they are not carrying any... oh, well.
    The Army individual first aid kit is more advanced than the old pressure bandage that used to be part of our kit.

    The Individual First Aid Kit increases individual warfighter capabilities to provide Self-Aid/Buddy-Aid and provides interventions for two leading causes of death on the battlefield, severe hemorrhage and inadequate airway. These capabilities increase soldier survivability during dispersed operations and the expandable pouch allows for METT-C specific “add-ins.”

    The IFAK was issued to every deploying Soldier via the Rapid Fielding Initiative. Weighing one pound, the IFAK consists of the following expendable medical items packaged inside of a modified MOLLE 100 round SAW ammo pouch.
    1 Utility Pouch 1 Tourniquet1 Elastic bandage kit 1 Bandage GA4-1/2” 100’s 1 Surgical adhesive tape 1 Nasopharyngeal airway kit 4 Surgical gloves 1 Combat gauze dressing
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. #102

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 152,027, Level: 93
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 2,023
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassCreated Album picturesYour first GroupRecommendation First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Adelaide's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    341325
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    N. Pole and VA
    Posts
    30,757
    Points
    152,027
    Level
    93
    Thanks Given
    4,025
    Thanked 18,449x in 11,739 Posts
    Mentioned
    1723 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    His idea actually isn't a bad one if you look at in a military context.

    Every soldier should carry at least a pressure bandage as part of his basic kit. If he is wounded, whoever responds to him will use the wounded man's own bandage on him. You could do the same with junkies. Tell them if they are carrying Narcan, the first responder will use it on them. If they are not carrying any... oh, well.
    An opiate overdose can happen in like 10 seconds without a person realizing until they stop breathing or lose consciousness. Sure, it would be handy for every person abusing opiates to carry around Narcan, but it's also probably going to be useless unless someone else is there to administer it.

    I mentioned earlier that public services in a few Canadian cities were handing out Narcan to groups of homeless users or known users and the overdose-related death rate dropped pretty drastically because they could use it on each other in emergencies, before police or paramedics arrive. We are talking about police being allowed to administer it, but the reality is that people are dying at an alarming rate because an overdose happens so quickly. Yes, police should be allowed to use and carry it. Yes, people should also be carrying it but it is probably going to have to be a friend or family member that administers it.

  3. #103

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 74,315, Level: 66
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 1,135
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    195694
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    32,312
    Points
    74,315
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    3,679
    Thanked 27,379x in 15,848 Posts
    Mentioned
    412 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    The Army individual first aid kit is more advanced than the old pressure bandage that used to be part of our kit.
    I didn't even think about IFAK. I have one on the vest in my active shooter kit.

    Good catch.
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (12-06-2018)

  5. #104
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496566
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,576x in 94,412 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    I didn't even think about IFAK. I have one on the vest in my active shooter kit.

    Good catch.
    Me and the Wife have some good first aid kits here. One is pretty advanced.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  6. #105
    Points: 6,315, Level: 18
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 35
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    ODB's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    449
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    671
    Points
    6,315
    Level
    18
    Thanks Given
    2,513
    Thanked 440x in 295 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Adelaide View Post
    Hospitals don't go, "Well, this person dying of a drug overdose doesn't have insurance so we probably shouldn't administer Narcan" when faced with that situation. How much value would you place on a human life? Does $20-$40 seem reasonable? That is the cost of generic naloxone.
    How large is that bubble you're in?

  7. #106
    Points: 432,048, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307958
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,405
    Points
    432,048
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,178
    Thanked 76,973x in 55,600 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    His idea actually isn't a bad one if you look at in a military context.

    Every soldier should carry at least a pressure bandage as part of his basic kit. If he is wounded, whoever responds to him will use the wounded man's own bandage on him. You could do the same with junkies. Tell them if they are carrying Narcan, the first responder will use it on them. If they are not carrying any... oh, well.
    When I was in the Army, we all did carry pressure dressings and other first aid items. We carried injectors to self administer a nerve agent antidote if needed.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (12-07-2018)

  9. #107
    Points: 172,917, Level: 98
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 733
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88548
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,904
    Points
    172,917
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,289
    Thanked 20,516x in 14,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Adelaide View Post
    An opiate overdose can happen in like 10 seconds without a person realizing until they stop breathing or lose consciousness. Sure, it would be handy for every person abusing opiates to carry around Narcan, but it's also probably going to be useless unless someone else is there to administer it.

    I mentioned earlier that public services in a few Canadian cities were handing out Narcan to groups of homeless users or known users and the overdose-related death rate dropped pretty drastically because they could use it on each other in emergencies, before police or paramedics arrive. We are talking about police being allowed to administer it, but the reality is that people are dying at an alarming rate because an overdose happens so quickly. Yes, police should be allowed to use and carry it. Yes, people should also be carrying it but it is probably going to have to be a friend or family member that administers it.

    This is why FAMILIES are trained and given the Narcan. No addict is going to walk around with his narcan.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts