This is not a Christian nation.

[Orion Rules]

[...]

Jesus did see two spheres: Heaven and Earth. One was spiritual and one was material. One belonged to God and the other to Man. Yet Jesus made it exceedingly clear that God was above man. So how can anyone interpret "render unto Caesar" as a command to obey earthly authorities when Jesus was about the business of God and Heaven?

It is whether those spheres of influence belong to the son of man or to mammon. The law is the difference to what that means. To render unto Caesar as to where was he standing?

The word had spread abroad, as Caesar heard of the good works of Jesus and then of who destroyed him.

The Lord is of the tribe of Judah of the original Judeans, not the mockery of what some jews or atheists will do is to attempt to change the light Jesus is of and call it darkness because money is what changes everything.

The tribe of Judah of those who settled the Sphinx of Ptah's land,

Numbers 9, the Sphinx was still standing there when was 33 A.D.

Sometimes, as in Macron, France, reality vote sets in. That is because austerity measures are not working. Greece, other countries, what happens in some banking: destroy countries, create deserts of "platitudes" to who will be starving?

Those with money a world gave them, how generous are they really? That is the test that Jesus told the young rich man to sell all he had in order to live. That is because the wealth he had was not his blessing, but something he had to look after to make sure no one else wanted it so he could live.

The wealth of poverty is that which he had to see.

How much real actual wealth has belonged to caesars who will be hiding in caves in order to escape the wrath of the people to eliminate those regarding the concept of, that because of them, what nations have burned?

The currencies are currents of good returns evil so that good is destroying evil because it can never learn. God created good to destroy evil, so Sobek.

Money is to to be a medium of exchange and so pay tribute to Caesar. It was Pontius Pilate who agreed to surrender the Lord to be killed. The good works of Jesus had spread abroad.

Jesus spoke in double-talk of how the pharisees hid and how the scribes read.

Pontius Pilate studied at a Druidic university where "what is truth?" was of the subject matter studied. He was established in the highest schools of Spain, an educated man who knew the words of truth Christ had spoken. The governor of a state where Caesar's spies were sent in.

'Render unto Caesar those things rendered and then so to hell if not heaven'.

At the ages of The Book of Numbers, exactly when was there never a plan in the mind of God to establish a Heavenly Kingdom?

What did Christ do to upset the money changers who had set themselves inside of his Father's house of who deserved expunging?

[Captain Obvious]

lawlz

[zachroidott]

Did Jesus oppose Rome?
Really? Which stories are about Jesus opposing Rome?

Then, why was he executed for sedition?




Careful.

[MisterVeritis]

Then, why was he executed for sedition?
Careful.

You seem to know the story. Explain it.

[donttread]

If they did support the Roman empire, then they had no business calling themselves Christians.

The very term Christian has become muddy. To some it is a strictly means a belief in Jesus as the son of God. To some just a membership card in a religion considered Christian. And in recent years some wield it almost as they would nationalism.
If you are a war mongering social con who happens to be Catholic but who secretly thinks Jesus was a man not the son of God: Are you Christian or not? If not what are you?

[MisterVeritis]

The very term Christian has become muddy. To some it is a strictly means a belief in Jesus as the son of God. To some just a membership card in a religion considered Christian. And in recent years some wield it almost as they would nationalism.
If you are a war mongering social con who happens to be Catholic but who secretly thinks Jesus was a man not the son of God: Are you Christian or not? If not what are you?

Having read the books, all of them, it seems to me one is a Christian if one accepts Jesus as his or her personal savior. Am I wrong?

[donttread]

Having read the books, all of them, it seems to me one is a Christian if one accepts Jesus as his or her personal savior. Am I wrong?

That sounds "born againish " to me but the point is the term has come to mean different things to different people. I' believe they're are millions of people who refer to themselves as Christians without a solid belief that Jesus was the son of God much less their personal savior.

[MisterVeritis]

That sounds "born againish " to me but the point is the term has come to mean different things to different people. I' believe they're are millions of people who refer to themselves as Christians without a solid belief that Jesus was the son of God much less their personal savior.

Then the term itself has no value.

[roadmaster]

Christians didn't make up this born again. Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

So if they claim they are Christians and don't believe on Him, not only are they not Christians but don't have the Father either. So whatever there is no different meanings.

People who come up with this junk are not believers themselves.

[Mister D]

The very term Christian has become muddy. To some it is a strictly means a belief in Jesus as the son of God. To some just a membership card in a religion considered Christian. And in recent years some wield it almost as they would nationalism.
If you are a war mongering social con who happens to be Catholic but who secretly thinks Jesus was a man not the son of God: Are you Christian or not? If not what are you?

If you're posting nonsense on a message board are you an idiot? If not, what are you?