User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Judge orders Justice and State to reopen narrow inquiry into handling of Clinton emai

  1. #11
    Points: 43,584, Level: 51
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 1,666
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10173
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,643
    Points
    43,584
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,411
    Thanked 10,164x in 6,407 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    about


    I have nothing against FOI , especially in a regime where there are trillions of pages of classified documents. I simply wasn't clear enough about the fact that I am referring to the whole process of these two "investigations"
    In the end Hilary and Donald will be unaffected although there will be lambs to be sacrificed. The voters will pay millions, the debt will climb a bit and the "show" will help hide what government is doing. Or more likely hide what they are NOT DOING. Which would be much of anything helpful to the average American.
    This one nothing other than govt lawyers resisting. Brought by Judicial Watch.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  2. #12
    Points: 64,730, Level: 62
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,820
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Xl's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    196597
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    27,967
    Points
    64,730
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    6,255
    Thanked 19,792x in 11,974 Posts
    Mentioned
    433 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hillary is way above the law, this is a waste of time, nothing is going to happen to her even if she's guilty.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to The Xl For This Useful Post:

    donttread (12-08-2018)

  4. #13
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Federal Judge Rips State Department for Helping to Bury Hillary's Email Scandal....


    A federal judge ripped the State Department during a court hearing this week and accused officials there of helping to cover up former Secretary Hillary Clinton's unlawful use of a private email server. The judge also took aim at the current Department of Justice.

    Judicial Watch announced today that, in a ruling excoriating both the U.S. Departments of State and Justice, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth has ordered both agencies to join Judicial Watch in submitting a proposed schedule for discovery into whether Hillary Clinton sought to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a private email system and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” by failing to disclose knowledge of the email system. The decision comes in a FOIA lawsuit related to the Benghazi terrorist attack.

    Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION:

    … his [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?

    At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence.
    At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.

    Lambert accused DOJ attorneys of "double speak" and "misleading" the court on the same issue…..snip~

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie....andal-n2537164




    The American people demand more than just some admonishing. Time to hook those specific people up for playing games with the court. They obstructed a Court of law. All to cover for Hillary. They aided and abetted criminal conduct.


    The Court should recommend that the cases be re-tried. With charges upon specific people for Obstruction and for intentionally deceiving The Court. What say ye?
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (12-08-2018),Peter1469 (12-08-2018)

  6. #14
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496573
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,583x in 94,415 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    about


    I have nothing against FOI , especially in a regime where there are trillions of pages of classified documents. I simply wasn't clear enough about the fact that I am referring to the whole process of these two "investigations"
    In the end Hilary and Donald will be unaffected although there will be lambs to be sacrificed. The voters will pay millions, the debt will climb a bit and the "show" will help hide what government is doing. Or more likely hide what they are NOT DOING. Which would be much of anything helpful to the average American.
    OK. The FOIA cases were separate from the investigations. And they got more relevant information than the investigations.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts