User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Wall Street Journal Ed Board Tells Mueller to 'Wrap it Up'.....

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Wall Street Journal Ed Board Tells Mueller to 'Wrap it Up'.....

    Last week's bombshells in the Robert Mueller investigation turned out to be nothing of the sort. Paul Manafort's crimes, lying to prosecutors about his contacts with Ukrainian business partners, were unrelated to his work on the Trump campaign. As for former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, he admitted to lying about his contact with a a Russian national who reached out to the Trump campaign, but nothing transpired.

    They conclude:

    "All of this argues for Mr. Mueller to wrap up his probe and let America get on with the political debate over its meaning for Mr. Trump’s Presidency," the Wall Street Journal urges. "Mr. Mueller has been investigating for 19 months, and the FBI’s counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign began in July 2016, if not earlier. The country deserves an account of what Mr. Mueller knows, not more factual dribs and drabs in sentencing memos."

    To some Democrats, however, Friday's information dump was earth shattering. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) said Michael Cohen's admitting to hush payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal may even be an "impeachable offense" for the president. Trump rejected that notion on Monday and said the payments were a private matter. (Please forgive the misspelling of "smoking," which earned its own Twitter trend.)

    By the way, as the WSJ notes, how are Democrats legitimately going to try and impeach Trump for trying to cover up a supposed sex scandal, when their party defended President Bill Clinton during his White House affair? "Good luck trying to impeach Mr. Trump for campaign-finance violations," they write.....snip~


    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortn...ed-board-tells-mueller-to-wrap-it-up-n2537233


    Ahahahaha…..the WSJ points out just how delusional Democrats are. Now even they are mocking Mueller openly. What say ye?


    So much for the lefts uhm hindsight with Mueller.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  2. #2
    Points: 432,063, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307961
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,412
    Points
    432,063
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,178
    Thanked 76,976x in 55,603 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Now the Democrats will call the WSJ a Trump mouthpiece.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    MMC (12-10-2018)

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    Now the Democrats will call the WSJ a Trump mouthpiece.
    Let them and their Cult following, and the SDNY take heed on that part about good luck with that.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  5. #4
    Points: 445,362, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339112
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,765
    Points
    445,362
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,785
    Thanked 18,315x in 10,924 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even our most liberal members along with all of america knows, that mueller timed these releases right after the midterms, he knew this long before the midterms. This entire investigation is all players linked together. Comey and Mueller are friends, Comey was appt by obama, his agents and he colluded to deny trump the presidency and failed and gave hillary a pass. The emails of the agents proves the collusion to get trump. They knew from the start they would drag this out as long as possible to do as much damage to trump as possible.

    This was a setup from the start orchestrated by obama and company
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  6. #5
    Points: 4,769, Level: 16
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 381
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HumblePi's Avatar Member
    Karma
    57
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    152
    Points
    4,769
    Level
    16
    Thanks Given
    70
    Thanked 47x in 34 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think Robert Mueller gives a crap what the editors of the WSJ have to say, it's none of their business and have no right to interfere with a federal investigation into criminal activities. Where were the WSJ editors when the Benghazi investigation was dragging on for 2 years culminating in a great big nothing?

  7. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496569
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,579x in 94,412 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    Even our most liberal members along with all of america knows, that mueller timed these releases right after the midterms, he knew this long before the midterms. This entire investigation is all players linked together. Comey and Mueller are friends, Comey was appt by obama, his agents and he colluded to deny trump the presidency and failed and gave hillary a pass. The emails of the agents proves the collusion to get trump. They knew from the start they would drag this out as long as possible to do as much damage to trump as possible.

    This was a setup from the start orchestrated by obama and company
    That and the dossier was never vetted. Plus Steele had previously been cut off by the FBI for lying to them about his media contacts. He was on the FBI's do not trust list.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (12-11-2018)

  9. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496569
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,579x in 94,412 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HumblePi View Post
    I don't think Robert Mueller gives a crap what the editors of the WSJ have to say, it's none of their business and have no right to interfere with a federal investigation into criminal activities. Where were the WSJ editors when the Benghazi investigation was dragging on for 2 years culminating in a great big nothing?
    The WSJ isn't telling Mueller what to do. They wrote an editorial.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Common (12-11-2018),MisterVeritis (12-11-2018),MMC (12-11-2018)

  11. #8
    Points: 445,362, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339112
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,765
    Points
    445,362
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,785
    Thanked 18,315x in 10,924 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    That and the dossier was never vetted. Plus Steele had previously been cut off by the FBI for lying to them about his media contacts. He was on the FBI's do not trust list.
    Comey, Strozk and Paige should have been on the FBI do not trust list
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Common For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (12-11-2018),Peter1469 (12-11-2018)

  13. #9
    Points: 113,293, Level: 81
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 357
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221647
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,200
    Points
    113,293
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,756x in 15,337 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HumblePi View Post
    I don't think Robert Mueller gives a crap what the editors of the WSJ have to say, it's none of their business and have no right to interfere with a federal investigation into criminal activities. Where were the WSJ editors when the Benghazi investigation was dragging on for 2 years culminating in a great big nothing?
    HRC did the "dragging on" by failing to comply with relevant docs (email).
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to hanger4 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (12-11-2018),MMC (12-11-2018),Peter1469 (12-11-2018)

  15. #10
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    The WSJ isn't telling Mueller what to do. They wrote an editorial.
    Yeah they aren't telling Mueller what to do....they're just showing Mueller has no Russian Collusion and that Cohen Flynn and Manafort hasn't amounted to anything but crimes they committed before Trump came along.


    Then letting the SDNY know.....good luck on the campaign finance law.


    While letting the Demos know they aren't to intelligent.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (12-11-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts