Members banned from this thread: Private Pickle |
If there is a merciful Gawd up there this can only mean one thing:
In future generations us white boys can finally jump a little higher!!!
Praise baby jeebus....!!!!
Volvo
“Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.”
America meaning the US? There was always considerable racial & ethnic diversity in what became the US - once the Europeans began arriving in 1492CE. Even before the UK, there were Vikings (who abandoned their colonies), Spanish, Portuguese, French, Dutch, Swedish - even with the massive die-off of Native Peoples (due to European diseases ravaging them), diversity was a real issue. Read Mayflower, a story of courage, community & war - Nathaniel Philbrick, c2006, Viking.
Or see http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...and-the-world/ - #1, the increasing racial & ethnic diversity of the US. If we pass on our values to the next generations, I think we'll be fine.
Remember what the Democrat party goal is. They do not care what color skin a potential voter has. All they care about is winning. They use the poorest, dumbest, sickest, black and brown people, not because they are black and brown but because they are poor, dumb, and sick. Oh, the real winner is they come, mostly, from third world, authoritarian nations. They accept Democrat corruption as they have known nothing else.
The Democrats had to do this as white, middle-class traditional Americans do not reliably vote for Democrats.
Let's face it. The Democrats have won.
Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.
I don't. You're paranoid. I merely elaborated on what you posted. I didn't take issue with you, but I will now: the "dominant gene" in black/white couplings is almost never the "white gene".
By contrast, the "white gene" is about on parity, as it were, with Asian and Native American genes, offspring of which can more closely resemble either or neither.
With blacks, on the other hand, it can take generations of admixture to remove characteristics of blacks, or conversely, drop whiteness in a single generation.
You already know this, of course.
On the other hand, all traces of Native American or Asian can disappear in one generation, or conversely, white characteristics can fade dramatically, but in either case the result is not dominant in appearance and can be very nice, even beautiful, certainly a hell of a lot nicer than this discussion, no thank you for baiting it.
That's just plain false, even to a casual observer, and you know it. If it was true, then why is the black race growing in America? It should be shrinking, but it isn't, not by a plantation mile.
Proportion of blacks to whites* in America in the year 1650 was roughtly 1/24; in 1850, it was about 1/5; in 1940, about 1/9, in 2010 was 1/6 (*Wikipedia).
Where in these numbers drawn from Census data do you see any suggestion of a "lightening" of skin or "whitening" of other characteristics, especially comparing ratios in 1850 with 2010? The proportion of blacks to whites in the US is about the same now as it was around the high water mark of so-called "slavery". If anything, there is a strong suggestion of the blackening of America, not the reverse, as you would like to promote. Point is, your remarks are all false.
Also, if you could be so forthright as whether you have any idea how offensive your notion of skin "lightening" would be to many, if not most, contemporary blacks. I'm asking.
Captdon (12-12-2018)
Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.
Most are not worried about a "browning of America", as they are more concerned with losing the culture which created and maintains the American way of life. They are more concerned about the concept of rugged individualism being lost or even demonized and the collective becomes the priority.
It's not about race or ethnicity.
MisterVeritis (12-12-2018)