User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Texas Republicans fail to oust Muslim official over religion

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 271,501, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    770609
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    75,944
    Points
    271,501
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    26,902
    Thanked 36,751x in 25,026 Posts
    Mentioned
    957 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Texas Republicans fail to oust Muslim official over religion

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46841814

    A Republican county official in Texas has survived a vote to oust him after several local party members took issue with his Muslim religion.
    The motion to remove Shahid Shafi from his position as vice chairman of the Tarrant County Republican party failed by a vote of 139-49 on Thursday night.
    The effort was led by several county Republicans who argued that Dr Shafi was more loyal to Islam than the US.
    The movement led to criticism from prominent state Republican officials.
    Speaking to reporters after the vote at a church in Fort Worth, Dr Shafi said: "As an immigrant to this great country, I am honoured and privileged to receive the support of my fellow Republicans."
    "We were fighting for religious freedom - a founding principle of our nation. And today, we have come out victorious," he declared.
    In addition to serving as the Republican vice chairman of Tarrant County - the third largest county in Texas - Dr Shafi is a surgeon and Southlake City Councilman who immigrated to the US nearly 30 years ago.
    He reportedly is originally from India, and became a US citizen in 2009.
    my junk is ugly

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Captain Obvious For This Useful Post:

    Admiral Ackbar (01-12-2019),Captdon (01-12-2019),gamewell45 (01-12-2019),Green Arrow (01-12-2019)

  3. #2

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 53,266, Level: 56
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,184
    Overall activity: 51.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    165702
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    13,426
    Points
    53,266
    Level
    56
    Thanks Given
    4,993
    Thanked 10,964x in 6,302 Posts
    Mentioned
    400 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That would be unconstitutional, I think.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (01-12-2019),Green Arrow (01-12-2019)

  5. #3
    Points: 6,878, Level: 19
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 52.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassYour first Group3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Admiral Ackbar's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1009
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,251
    Points
    6,878
    Level
    19
    Thanks Given
    671
    Thanked 999x in 623 Posts
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think so too.
    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining"----Fletcher in The Outlaw Josey Wales

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Admiral Ackbar For This Useful Post:

    DGUtley (01-12-2019)

  7. #4
    Points: 139,277, Level: 89
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 173
    Overall activity: 58.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupVeteran
    Green Arrow's Avatar Overlord
    Karma
    619200
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    45,769
    Points
    139,277
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    52,599
    Thanked 23,949x in 15,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    1653 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    That would be unconstitutional, I think.
    Violation of the First amendment and the clause about requiring tests for public office I would think.
    "Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."
    - Robert F. Kennedy (1925-1968), U.S. Senator from New York and U.S. Attorney General

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Green Arrow For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (01-12-2019)

  9. #5
    Points: 6,878, Level: 19
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 52.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassYour first Group3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Admiral Ackbar's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1009
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,251
    Points
    6,878
    Level
    19
    Thanks Given
    671
    Thanked 999x in 623 Posts
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Arrow View Post
    Violation of the First amendment and the clause about requiring tests for public office I would think.
    Yes..Isn't the irony of this that Kamala Harris and Sen what's her name from HI were recently imposing such a test on a Roman Catholic that was up for judgeship? They should head this as well.
    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining"----Fletcher in The Outlaw Josey Wales

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Admiral Ackbar For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (01-12-2019)

  11. #6

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 53,266, Level: 56
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,184
    Overall activity: 51.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    165702
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    13,426
    Points
    53,266
    Level
    56
    Thanks Given
    4,993
    Thanked 10,964x in 6,302 Posts
    Mentioned
    400 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Arrow View Post
    Violation of the First amendment and the clause about requiring tests for public office I would think.
    That was my thought exactly, I was just hesitating whether that was in the 1st and/or elsewhere. It's specifically in Article VI, though it impacts the free exercise thereof:

    . . . .The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.


    I question whether the argument that the term "under the United States" is interpreted to mean only federal officials has been made. I think it is weak but Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution has the same provision. It would never stand. IMNSHO.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Green Arrow (01-12-2019)

  13. #7

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 53,266, Level: 56
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,184
    Overall activity: 51.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    165702
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    13,426
    Points
    53,266
    Level
    56
    Thanks Given
    4,993
    Thanked 10,964x in 6,302 Posts
    Mentioned
    400 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral Ackbar View Post
    Yes..Isn't the irony of this that Kamala Harris and Sen what's her name from HI were recently imposing such a test on a Roman Catholic that was up for judgeship? They should head this as well.
    Agree and several prominent D's stood up against Harris and whatshername from Hawaii.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  14. #8
    Points: 139,277, Level: 89
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 173
    Overall activity: 58.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupVeteran
    Green Arrow's Avatar Overlord
    Karma
    619200
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    45,769
    Points
    139,277
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    52,599
    Thanked 23,949x in 15,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    1653 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    That was my thought exactly, I was just hesitating whether that was in the 1st and/or elsewhere. It's specifically in Article VI, though it impacts the free exercise thereof:

    . . . .The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.


    I question whether the argument that the term "under the United States" is interpreted to mean only federal officials has been made. I think it is weak but Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution has the same provision. It would never stand. IMNSHO.
    Agreed.
    "Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."
    - Robert F. Kennedy (1925-1968), U.S. Senator from New York and U.S. Attorney General

  15. #9
    Points: 434,837, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    394017
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    143,500
    Points
    434,837
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    14,263
    Thanked 41,585x in 30,751 Posts
    Mentioned
    1679 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    That was my thought exactly, I was just hesitating whether that was in the 1st and/or elsewhere. It's specifically in Article VI, though it impacts the free exercise thereof:

    . . . .The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.


    I question whether the argument that the term "under the United States" is interpreted to mean only federal officials has been made. I think it is weak but Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution has the same provision. It would never stand. IMNSHO.
    It has to be the no religious test clauses in the body of those two Constitutions.

    As I reported in Conservative Supreme Court could reverse decades of First Amendment law, the current preecedent regarding the establishment claise of the 1st amendment is based on "feelings of offense and exclusion."
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  16. #10
    Points: 32,511, Level: 44
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 1,439
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience PointsTagger Second Class
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5499
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    South Carolina now.
    Posts
    15,349
    Points
    32,511
    Level
    44
    Thanks Given
    25,423
    Thanked 5,492x in 4,322 Posts
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    That was my thought exactly, I was just hesitating whether that was in the 1st and/or elsewhere. It's specifically in Article VI, though it impacts the free exercise thereof:

    . . . .The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.


    I question whether the argument that the term "under the United States" is interpreted to mean only federal officials has been made. I think it is weak but Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution has the same provision. It would never stand. IMNSHO.
    The several states should cover it.
    Liberals are a clear and present danger to our freedom and our society and our morals.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO