New York legalized late-term abortions, and celebrated like it won the Super Bowl

[Captdon]

Am I also on your list of who to send the brownshirts after?

Good luck with that.

Another deflection. No one comes after the useless.

[Captdon]

Because human DNA is the only important factor?

For abortion? Of course only human DNA matters. Human life is the only factor. Was that too hard to understand? Ask a hs freshman to explain it to you.

Sometimes I wish I had been able to go to college. Then I see what you say and realize I may not have gained anything.

[Captdon]

All manner of unique human beings are flushed daily from the reproductive systems of women within days or weeks of conception - some because the embryos are not viable and some because the body doesn't want to be pregnant. Within the first month of conception, there isn't more than the framework of a brain. The DNA may well be human, but it's not yet anywhere near being as complex as a minnow in a stream. I can't imagine why the projected life of an early stage zygote takes on so much importance to some people, when the actually born, totally formed, feeling, thinking babies and children of the world seem to be dismissed with contempt as the responsibilities of their parents and if they die, the same people could not care less, and only care more if it's likely to cost them money. The real truth is that most people who support the right to life cause care more about the cost of abortions being paid for by their taxes, not the lives of the aborted. At the end of the day, it's really about money, not morality or ethics.

What nature does is on nature. Abortion is on your kind. There's your fact.

You people won't ever use baby because it embarrasses you.

Do you even know how to stick to the subject? We are talking about the deliberate act of murder. that's what you are supporting.

At the end of the day it is about you having no morals a dog would want.

[Captdon]

If DNA is the only important factor, tumors contain human DNA, not giraffe or frog DNA. It's highly unlikely that any human female would get pregnant by a different species, so human DNA is basically a given.

You trying to change the subject is also a given.

[Captdon]

I thought it should be clear by now that I am pro-choice but not pro late-term abortions. I support abortion within the first trimester - as early as possible and only support 2nd-trimester abortion if it is a matter of risking the life or long-term health of the mother.

Murder doesn't have a starting point beyond the act itself.

[nathanbforrest45]

Why does disagreeing with any liberal position constitute "hate" but disagreeing with a conservative gets you a spot on late night TV?

[mamooth]

You miss the distinction made about a unique living human being from conception.

I don't miss it. I just discard it, being it's plainly an arbitrary and subjective distinction. The fact that you hold such arbitrary and subjective criteria to be important does not bind anyone else to do so.

And speaking of illogic, you're playing semantic games with ambiguity in the work 'begin.' We're not here speaking of when life began,

So you're actually denying that the fundamental pro-life claim is "Life begins at conception". Why are you denying it?

How do you justify that level of dishonesty?

it's too late to abort that, though I'm sure a silly liberal like you would prefer that.

I'm not the one who says a child is as morally worthless as a zygote. It's only your side that makes sick dehumanization an official policy.

[mamooth]

Another deflection. No one comes after the useless.

In his next post, MisterVeritas then announced that someone nearby would eventually murder me. You had no problem with that.

The other pro-lifers were smart enough not to jump on the MisterVeritas brownshirt wagon, so I didn't ask them to condemn the statement. However, you couldn't help yourself, so now you get to be the one to explain why no pro-lifers will condemn such a violent attitude.

And this:

Of course only human DNA matters

is eugenics. All hail the superior DNA! The Pro-life philosophy is a eugenics philosophy. What happens when you decide that my DNA isn't up to snuff? Do I go to the camps with the other subhumans?

[mamooth]

Why does disagreeing with any liberal position constitute "hate" but disagreeing with a conservative gets you a spot on late night TV?

That victimhood whine came out of nowhere. Did anything specific bring it on?

[Chris]

I don't miss it. I just discard it, being it's plainly an arbitrary and subjective distinction. The fact that you hold such arbitrary and subjective criteria to be important does not bind anyone else to do so.


So you're actually denying that the fundamental pro-life claim is "Life begins at conception". Why are you denying it?

How do you justify that level of dishonesty?



I'm not the one who says a child is as morally worthless as a zygote. It's only your side that makes sick dehumanization an official policy.

I don't miss it. I just discard it...

Same difference, you discard science, biology. That's not arbitrary or subjective like what you argue having discarded science. Argue? No, you don't argue anything.

The rest of your word twisting ignored.