Democrat that pushed for Infanticide filed Bill to Protect Bugs......

[MMC]

Sanctity of Caterpillars: Virginia Legislator Who Pushed Infanticide Law Also Filed Bill To Save Bugs.....


Democrat Delegate Kathy Tran, who submitted the horrifying legislation that would have allowed babies to be murdered even after birth, also filed legislation to ensure the sanctity of life for “fall cankerworms.”

Tran filed “H.B. 2495 Fall cankerworm; spraying prohibited during certain months,” a bill that would protect the lives of caterpillars and other insects during certain months, on the same day she filed “H.B. 2491 Abortion; eliminate certain requirements,” the defeated legislation that would have made it legal for a new mother to give birth, then determine that she does not want the child and have it killed.


H.B. 2495 would protect the lives of gypsy moths,cankerworms, and other insects that may carry diseases harmful to humans, by preventing pest control spraying for them between the months of March and August......snip~


https://bigleaguepolitics.com/sancti...-to-save-bugs/


Will Virginians now see they voted in a kook? Repubs in Virginia need to put this Demo on notice and paint her out as a straight up nut. Then make sure she is chased out of politics after her term is up. What say ye?

[Common]

lol you really cant make this insanity up, kill the babies save the caterpillars

[MMC]

lol you really cant make this insanity up, kill the babies save the caterpillars

Plus save the bugs that could possibly carry diseases that harm humans.

[Captdon]

Bugs are not babies. Save the bugs!

[Peter1469]

Priorities....

[Tahuyaman]

The argument will be that Insects are an important part of the balance of nature, but an unborn child is a nonviable tissue mass.

[mamooth]

At this stage, the hardcore pro-lifers are only interesting as studies in abnormal psychology.

Look at this thread. They're just babbling senselessly about a pesticide regulation bill and pro-liberty common sense abortion bill. Not the most rational bunch. But then, that's a given. Only those who run entirely on emotion would allows themselves to be sucked in by the reality-defying emotionalism of the pro-life cult.

[Peter1469]

At this stage, the hardcore pro-lifers are only interesting as studies in abnormal psychology.

Look at this thread. They're just babbling senselessly about a pesticide regulation bill and pro-liberty common sense abortion bill. Not the most rational bunch. But then, that's a given. Only those who run entirely on emotion would allows themselves to be sucked in by the reality-defying emotionalism of the pro-life cult.

Those that hold value in life are part of a cult?

What an odd position to take.

[Green Arrow]

I had a long debate with myself on whether to drop this bomb now or wait to see who else comes out to embarrass themselves, but let’s be honest, it’s too funny not to jump now.

Y’all do know that most of these articles, even the bull$#@! liars like “Big League Politics,” all include links to the actual bill text, right? Because this one did. I read it twice in 30 minutes. Nowhere in the bill does it allow a woman to kill a baby after it has been born.

[Tahuyaman]

At this stage, the hardcore pro-lifers are only interesting as studies in abnormal psychology.

Look at this thread. They're just babbling senselessly about a pesticide regulation bill and pro-liberty common sense abortion bill. Not the most rational bunch. But then, that's a given. Only those who run entirely on emotion would allows themselves to be sucked in by the reality-defying emotionalism of the pro-life cult.

At this stage, the hard core “pro choices” are only interested in ensuring a woman chooses abortion as often as possible and even as a child is being born.

Look at them in this thread. They are completely avoiding the real issue and babbling senselessly about media bias in reporting this. Not the most rational bunch, but that’s a given. They are allowing themselves to be sucked in by the over emotional pro abortion cult.