The consensus seems to be more of a conciliation than anything else. The models, the basis of the 'science,' have been consistently wrong and have overstated warning predictions.
There are serious scientists who question the methods, data, and conclusions. But they are ignored. This is not a new reaction in science. Past theories have been shown to be wrong in the face of "consensus" after a period of shunning the naysayers. Judith Curry and the members of the Non-profit International Climate Change panel is a good place to look for science that is not in lock-step with the "consensus."
Perhaps worse of all, even if the warmists are correct, it appears that their solutions, when tried, cause violent riots like the ones we have seen in France, Belgium and in other parts of Europe in response to crippling gas taxes. What is a warmist to do? Probably go 'Jack-Boot' on society and roll out the totalitarians to force what is 'good' onto us.