Safety (03-19-2019)
Peter1469 (03-12-2019)
So what you're saying is that because you're unhappy with a man's successful defense of his right to choose in the Supreme Court, in the face of explicitly admitted religious bigotry by the government if Colorado, the writer roper ting these facts is unreliable because he reported these facts.
What part if the Thirteenth Amendment confuses you?
Freedom Requires Obstinance.
We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.
MisterVeritis (03-15-2019)
And, back to reality land, the Supreme Court, including a couple of the Rodent Justices, agreed that the fascist board was improperly biased against Christians and their persecution was unlawful thereby.
Explain why a private business owner should suffer state persecution for declining business. Did the prospective customer have a right to service? Cite the Thirteenth Amendment.
Freedom Requires Obstinance.
We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.
"In both Europe and the United States some Christians went further, arguing that slavery was actually justified by the words and doctrines of the Bible.
[Slavery] was established by decree of Almighty God...it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelation...it has existed in all ages, has been found among the people of the highest civilization, and in nations of the highest proficiency in the arts.
— Jefferson Davis, President, Confederate States of America[135]
... the right of holding slaves is clearly established in the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example.
— Richard Furman, President, South Carolina Baptist Convention"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...ews_on_slavery
While slavery was not condoned or justified by the majority of Christian faiths, it was used by some Christian sects with an agenda, to do just that. To argue otherwise is simply disingenuous as is denying that the long history of antisemitic teachings in Christian churches had nothing to do with justifying the historical persecution of Jews or indeed of the scapegoating of European Jews in the years leading up to and during WWII. Religion was also used to justify the murders of so-called witches in Salem and the murder of abortionists by certain members of the Westborough Baptist Church. You only need to argue freedom of religion when yours is not the dominant faith or dominant sect. Neither religion nor the freedom of religious belief takes precedence over the law. If it did, we would have fundamentalists of all kinds maiming and murdering apostates, heretics and adulterers at will without legal consequence.
In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi