If this next judge doesn’t max him out or give him a significant sentence to be served consecutively her life might be in danger.
If this next judge doesn’t max him out or give him a significant sentence to be served consecutively her life might be in danger.
MisterVeritis (03-13-2019)
That's a rather dishonest interpretation of what the judge had to say.
Perhaps you are the "intended audience" to which she referred.Jackson from the bench called the defense’s repeated claims about the lack of collusion with the Russian government “a non-sequitur.” Jackson said such assertions were not persuasive to her, but perhaps were intended for another “audience".
The question of whether anyone in Trump’s campaign “conspired or colluded with” the Russian government “was not presented in this case,” she said.
She added that the assertion may not even be accurate because special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe is not over and she found that Manafort had lied to investigators about issues at the heart of that inquiry.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...=.7b165f67f717