If you prefer to think of Gould's critique as sloppy and ironically biased that's fine. He was very careful not to accuse Morton outright of consciously falsifying data but he knew his readers would get the hint.
No, the anthropologists who blasted Gould were not "found to be biased" and you could call the vast majority of scientific research "junk" by contemporary standards. We get it. You don't like racism. Gould didn't either and let his politics influence his research. That was his biggest and most ironic failing. It appears to be yours as well.