Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler
And they've tried, and been unable to do so. So what's your protest? As the poster claimed to have special knowledge that the scientists lacked, I wanted to know what it was.
Odd, how you think consensus matters not in other science, and that climate science isn't falsifiable.That is why the scientific consensus on climate change is so odd, it lies outside the standard approach of science, falsification.
Excellent. I'll give you a chance to demonstrate your knowledge of the topic by asking the same question as before. What is your theory of the current climate, and what hard data could falsify it?And you do? LOL, you don't even understand falsification.
I can obviously show many ways climate science is falsifiable, but I'll be waiting on your response before I put forth the effort. If you're going to tell us again how the topic you just brought up isn't relevant, there's no point in wasting the keystrokes.
Odd, you reverse what I've said is my opinion, that consensus is not part of science, falsifiability is.Odd, how you think consensus matters not in other science, and that climate science isn't falsifiable.
Again you try to turn things around. That's for climatologist to do, as I said, scientist are required to specify how their hypotheses are falsifiable.What is your theory of the current climate, and what hard data could falsify it?
If you've been trying to demostrate your trolling skills at spinning, you have succeeded.
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler
Given you won't tell us how to your own beliefs could possibly be falsified, that seems to be your admission that your beliefs are not scientific.
And that's been done by climate science, but not by deniers. Hence, by your standards, climate science is real science, and denialism is psuedoscience.Again you try to turn things around. That's for climatologist to do, as I said, scientist are required to specify how their hypotheses are falsifiable.
I'm glad we've finally cleared that up. Took long enough.