Conservative Media -- Salem

[MMC]

The WSJ opinion "page" is hard left.

Depends on who is doing the writing some days the Right leaning Journalists rue the day. Like Kimberly Strassel, Barone, Beck, Copeland, Cohen, Cole. Shapiro etc etc.


USA/Gannet-NBC owns the most Newspapers.


The Chicago Tribune was Right leaning and always gave the NY Slimes the blues. Until a couple years ago when they were bought out by some leftists out of NY.

[MMC]

So where should someone get their news from?

There is no truly Independent News Sources. Like Media Bias and Newsbusters say. Those sources that do a good job with factual reporting still require further investigation.


I worked for the Chicago Tribune for 15 years and now I am with the Times. Leftist owned. For the last 4yrs now going on 5 years.

[alexa]

According to MediaBias they say they have minimal bias. But still lean left. WSJ is owned by News Corp they still consider them Center Right.


The BBC is Left.


BBC - Media Bias/Fact Check

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.



Wall Street Journal - Media Bias/Fact Check

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.


Both the AP and Reuters is Left Center Bias. Which when it comes to Elections they lean more to the left as to how and what they don't report on purpose.

Why do you lie about things that are easily checked? Reuters and AP are rated least biased by your amateur media watch site.

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.

• Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources.

• Overall, we rate the Associated Press Least Biased based on balanced story selection and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

[Mister D]

As I said, all information that's passed along is subject to human bias. Outlets like Reuters however, do attempt to simply relay facts through traditional journalism. They make an honest attempt to minimize bias and intend to practice journalistic integrity.

While mainstream media does have an urban, liberal and academic bias. It's simply because the news is produced by university educated urbanites by and large. I'd argue that it's opinion segments are left leaning, their reporting isn't overtly biased. But as I mentioned, as the right wing has moved so far right, the centre is perceived as far left. The proliferation of overtly biased right wing media has only furthered that perception.

...and again, it's hard to take the accusations of bias (and how harmful it is) seriously, when the right has wholeheartedly and unabashedly embraced right wing biased media.

You wield the term "traditional journalism" as if it's some kind of talisman protecting you from manipulation. After Russiagate you should be wiser. So should del.

Mainstream media has had that bias for a very long time. This bias was and is overt and obvious to those who, unlike you, do not share it. As for " far" right and left I don't think these terms describe anything that isn't essentially liberal in the original sense of the term. That is, there is little to nothing radical about politics in the US or Canada.

I don't disagree but that's only because "news" is propaganda and necessarily so.

[Common Sense]

It depends on what you intend. If you are happy living as you do, as a serf just keep on doing what you are doing. If you ever discover you want more consider getting better opinions.

Can you provide some specific sources?

[MisterVeritis]

Why do you lie about things that are easily checked? Reuters and AP are rated least biased by your amateur media watch site.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

Any source that commingles opinion with news tends to be left. There may be one or two or even three writers who do not but most do. Perhaps they are attempting to reform themselves.

No matter.

I am delighted we are seeing an increase in Conservative voices.

[MMC]

Why do you lie about things that are easily checked? Reuters and AP are rated least biased by your amateur media watch site.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/



https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

Minimal Bias should be a clue even for your damaged brain to figure out. Of course the NY Sun, and Moses Yale Beech puts that reality check on things.

So save the bull$#@! about Lying Dip$#@!.


Oh and btw Reuters is owned by Woodbridge.

[MisterVeritis]

Can you provide some specific sources?

For a Canadian? Why?

For an American interested in well reasoned opinions I would begin with Mark Levin. If you want even more consider Blaze TV. You can see shows covering a wide variety of topics from a stated Conservative position.
Some of the shows are horrible. A few are very good.

I do not mind to partisan news sources. I do mind that they pretend to be objective.

[alexa]

Minimal Bias should be clue even for your damaged brain to figure out. Of course the NY Sun, and Moses Yale Beech puts that reality check on things.

So save the bull$#@! about Lying Dip$#@!.

Whatever you say.

Least biased isn't left biased. You lied.

Suck it up.

[Common Sense]

There is no truly Independent News Sources. Like Media Bias and Newsbusters say. Those sources that do a good job with factual reporting still require further investigation.


I worked for the Chicago Tribune for 15 years and now I am with the Times. Leftist owned. For the last 4yrs now going on 5 years.

I agree that people should use multiple sources. There's a danger in only consuming news from one source or one perspective.

However, if you're interested in facts, wouldn't it be wise to choose centrist sources rather than overtly biased ones? Between Reuters and say Redstate, which do you think contains more bias?