In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi
Yeah, who is always leading the charge to invade other countries, not Canada, Australia or New Zealand. 99% of the time its the US who press gangs the UK and that drags in its former colonies. How many countries are waiting with baited breath to invade first world countries. None. That ended with WWII. Nobody can afford it anymore. The MIC has to satisfy themselves with arming all sides of third world conflicts and if they end, the MiC goes out of business. I'll leave it to you to figure out why they are not ending.
In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi
Whatever you may think of Switzerland's conduct during WWII, the fact remains, they have never relied on protection from the US.
Armed neutrality - which is the same policy America's founders pursued - has certainly helped the Swiss economy, yes.That helped their economy a lot, didn't it?
Their citizens enjoy a very high quality of life. There is very low poverty in Switzerland. Their environment is pristine. Their cities immaculate. Their infrastructure is world class. And they do it without high taxes and crushing debt. The US could do it too.
Huh?Or, forgetting all thst, since the hatred of socialists for Jewish peasants is well known, how about if we discuss how all of Europe had been able to fund their idiotic kleptomanic socialist scams while cowering under the nuclear umbrella of peace held and financed by US taxpayers, and by the US troops stationed as sacrifices to their defence since the end of wwii?
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
The word top is synonymous with highest or it could imply best, however either way you look at it Canada and NZ are neither among the highest rates which are above 50%, nor are they all that close to the truly lowest rates which would be those that are 0-20%. Nothing about the linked data does anything to change that. The average or median value in that data is 30.925.
So what do you mean by "top"?
In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi
Safety (05-15-2019)
Anxiously awaiting response that answers nothing and implicates the question for the lack. That’s a really popular shtick here.
Compared to the last few presidents, Trump has pushed for less interventionism and less spending on defending other nations. If future presidents can continue that trend, then we might be able to actually shrink our debt and government overall.
Granted, the welfare state is pretty huge in its own right.