User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: We need to rethink our economic assumptions

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 569,357, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    435567
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    169,855
    Points
    569,357
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    101,581
    Thanked 86,548x in 58,082 Posts
    Mentioned
    2278 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    We need to rethink our economic assumptions

    We need to rethink our economic assumptions

    The author advocates that we move past neoliberalism- the dominate economic paradogm.

    To defeat Trump in the upcoming election, Democrats are advancing a set of proposals engineered to excite their base: a single payer health system, college for all, a guaranteed jobs program. All are worthy of debate but perhaps the problems go deeper. Perhaps they go to the core of our beliefs about how the world works, what makes the economy tick, and how this relates to human welfare.

    The dominant paradigm right now is what is sometimes called Neoliberalism which I define as a belief in the efficiency of markets. Those on the left believe that a market economy needs more than a little help from government. There are social costs and benefits that markets ignore; economic downturns are not self-correcting; and a lack of competition or transparency can harm consumers. By addressing these and other shortcomings, government can free the market to do what it does best. Still, the central belief is that markets are the most efficient way to organize a society and by extension optimize individual freedom.

    Critics of this paradigm note that it is fundamentally flawed. Human beings are not just consumers, they donít always behave rationally, and they donít always maximize their own well-being. They need a sense of community, they care about the welfare of others, and their sense of what matters goes well beyond a larger GDP. They respond not just to economic incentives but to the desire for respect from their peers, to social norms, and to moral or religious principles. There is an efficient allocation of resources to go with every possible allocation of dollar votes and the distribution of dollar votes should be a communal decision arrived at by democratic means.
    Read the rest at the link. The author gets it wrong at the end of the article about taxes and government revenue,
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Chris (05-10-2019)

  3. #2
    Points: 30,236, Level: 42
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 814
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger Second Class25000 Experience Points
    Mini Me's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    19012
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Grass Valley, CA
    Posts
    11,006
    Points
    30,236
    Level
    42
    Thanks Given
    105
    Thanked 148x in 124 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    We need to rethink our economic assumptions

    The author advocates that we move past neoliberalism- the dominate economic paradogm.



    Read the rest at the link. The author gets it wrong at the end of the article about taxes and government revenue,
    So you hate liberalism and democracy? NOT GOOD!

  4. #3
    Points: 137,393, Level: 89
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 2,057
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First Class
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    291084
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    63,372
    Points
    137,393
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    52,765
    Thanked 22,451x in 17,099 Posts
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This paragraph shows the author is an idiot:

    Central planning, after all, had failed. But it also led to tax cuts and then more tax cuts under Reagan, Bush, and Trump, all of which starved the government of resources...
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Sergeant Gleed (05-14-2019)

  6. #4
    Original Ranter
    Points: 569,357, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    435567
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    169,855
    Points
    569,357
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    101,581
    Thanked 86,548x in 58,082 Posts
    Mentioned
    2278 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
    So you hate liberalism and democracy? NOT GOOD!
    What led you to draw that conclusion? I provided only one opinion about the article and that referred to tax cuts and government revenue.
    Last edited by Peter1469; 05-10-2019 at 11:48 AM.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  7. #5
    Points: 478,549, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    399880
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    154,371
    Points
    478,549
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    16,550
    Thanked 47,455x in 34,795 Posts
    Mentioned
    1748 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Critics of this paradigm note that it is fundamentally flawed. Human beings are not just consumers, they don’t always behave rationally, and they don’t always maximize their own well-being. They need a sense of community, they care about the welfare of others, and their sense of what matters goes well beyond a larger GDP. They respond not just to economic incentives but to the desire for respect from their peers, to social norms, and to moral or religious principles.
    That much I agree with but I doubt liberal individualists do.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (05-10-2019)

  9. #6
    Points: 13,559, Level: 28
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 891
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Sergeant Gleed's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2044
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Right Now? The Planet Gand
    Posts
    4,872
    Points
    13,559
    Level
    28
    Thanks Given
    492
    Thanked 2,036x in 1,585 Posts
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Human beings are mostly mindless consumers of whatever is being peddled. They are often hulled into bad decisions by tricky marketing, as the financial success of the glow ball warming cultists, the socialists, and the race baiting poverty pimps deminstrates.

    They are statically reprrsentabke and thus does the dark science of economics establish camps on both sides of any argument...because liars can figure and they do love their socialism.
    Freedom Requires Obstinance.

    We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO